[spamdyke-users] DNSRBL question
I have a question. I have the line below in my config. check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org So spamdyke should check if the sender is listed correct? and it should never need to pass the traffic to qmail? My observation so far seems that spamdyke is not doing this and my qmail install (qmailtoaster) is still doing the dns rbl checking. My qmail smtp log says this: 2008-05-03 10:27:50.146011500 rblsmtpd: 201.12.53.18 pid 27047: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=201.12.53.18 And nothing in the corresponding spamdyke maillog. log-level=2 smtp run file. #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail` NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` BLACKLIST=`cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists` SMTPD=/usr/bin/spamdyke -f /etc/mail/spamdyke.conf /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd TCP_CDB=/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb RBLSMTPD=/usr/bin/rblsmtpd HOSTNAME=`hostname` VCHKPW=/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw REQUIRE_AUTH=0 exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 2000 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \ $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21 ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] DNSRBL question
The old RBLSMTPD is doing the lookup before passing it on to spamdyke, so spamdyke is never receiving it. You need to remove $RBLSMTPD $BLACLISTS to disable the toaster's stock blacklist processing. You didn't use qtp-install-spamdyke, did you? It would have modified your run file to look like this: #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail` NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` SPAMDYKE=/usr/local/bin/spamdyke SPAMDYKE_CONF=/etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf SMTPD=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd TCP_CDB=/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb HOSTNAME=`hostname` VCHKPW=/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw REQUIRE_AUTH=0 exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 2000 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \ $SPAMDYKE --config-file $SPAMDYKE_CONF \ $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21 I think that's a little cleaner than burying spamdyke in $SMTPD as you have done. If you use the above run script, be sure to change /etc/spamdyke to /etc/mail, or move your spamdyke.conf file appropriately. slamp slamp wrote: I have a question. I have the line below in my config. check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org So spamdyke should check if the sender is listed correct? and it should never need to pass the traffic to qmail? My observation so far seems that spamdyke is not doing this and my qmail install (qmailtoaster) is still doing the dns rbl checking. My qmail smtp log says this: 2008-05-03 10:27:50.146011500 rblsmtpd: 201.12.53.18 pid 27047: 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=201.12.53.18 And nothing in the corresponding spamdyke maillog. log-level=2 smtp run file. #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail` NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` BLACKLIST=`cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists` SMTPD=/usr/bin/spamdyke -f /etc/mail/spamdyke.conf /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd TCP_CDB=/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb RBLSMTPD=/usr/bin/rblsmtpd HOSTNAME=`hostname` VCHKPW=/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw REQUIRE_AUTH=0 exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 2000 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \ -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \ $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21 ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users -- -Eric 'shubes' ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] the next version release
Sam i would like to be betatester of spamdyke. Also i would like to colaborate to translate to spanish anything you want. Nightduke 2008/5/2 Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, I will want some beta testers for version 4.0.0. I'll probably set up a separate mailing list when I'm ready to call for volunteers. -- Sam Clippinger nightduke wrote: Sam do you need betatesters? Regards Nightduke 2008/5/2, BC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 5/1/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So... mid-May for sure. :) Trust us. We are all VERY indebted to you for coming up with spamdyke and VERY willing to patiently await the next version. What you have described as 'merely' involving v4.1.0 would be a *lifetime* undertaking for me, so to do it in a few months is amazing, IMO. 200-300 scripts yet to be written? Boggles the mind... Bucky PS - congratulations on the new business venture, too! ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
