Re: [spamdyke-users] Second SD Stats report + Question re spamdyke-qrv
People, On 2016-05-04 19:39, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote: People, Last year I reported some stats after I had been using SD for about a month and now I have a second set - unfortunately I forgot to increase the number of backlogs for logrotate and I lost a few months of data to compare delivered spam to but the latest stats are from 100 days of data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GqinPR2mA0Jz-uTZ2zVJgutpiDl62HNbn2gWGNpd7Tk/pubhtml There were some changes to the conf file between sets of data but I didn't keep notes about changes and dates etc however it seems that the proportion of ALLOWED lines went down a little which suggests more spam was stopped - but conversely, the proportion of delivered spams compared to SD lines went up a little - which I don't quite understand . . Now I want to try and stop the delivered spams that have invalid email addresses - I have compiled and installed spamdyke-qrv OK and set "reject-recipient" to "invalid" but these spams are still getting through and then being bounced and since the return address is bogus I get a postmaster message that the bounce has failed eg for the address: jackspr...@pricom.com.au - suggestions? Can anyone respond to my question? - I must be missing something simple I think . . Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
[spamdyke-users] softlimit error
Now that I've set log-level=excessive, I can see these two errors that spamdyke is spitting out a lot: May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3226): data segment hard limit is less than infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 34359738368 May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3244): stack size hard limit is less than infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 536870912 Seems to be a harmless error report. Per Sam's suggestion quite some time ago, I quit using the 'softlimit' option in the tcpserver startup "run" files. Available memory >5GiB free all the time. Very fast CPU. The email part of the server is very lightly used as the box is primarily an NAS and for me to play and experiment with intellectually. Had no crashes that I know of - been up for 41+ days since my last intentional reboot. Thoughts? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
[spamdyke-users] IPv6 Question
Using FreeBSD here. In addition to my normal IPv4 connection, I have an IPv6 tunnel set up via Hurricane Electric. Also use unbound as my local DNS cache resolver for resolving both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses and it has been doing both for over a year now. spamdyke doesn't seem to like the IPv6 resolver. /var/log/maillog showing LOTS of lines like this (log-level=info): May 4 13:08:56 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18382]: ERROR(load_resolver_file()@search_fs.c:753): invalid/unparsable nameserver found: fd00::1 My /etc/resolv.conf file contains these two lines: nameserver 10.0.0.1 nameserver fd00::1 I didn't think that spamdyke is IPv6 aware? Shouldn't it ignore the second nameserver line above? In hopes of getting some more info about this, I've set log-level=excessive. Thoughts? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
[spamdyke-users] Second SD Stats report
People, Last year I reported some stats after I had been using SD for about a month and now I have a second set - unfortunately I forgot to increase the number of backlogs for logrotate and I lost a few months of data to compare delivered spam to but the latest stats are from 100 days of data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GqinPR2mA0Jz-uTZ2zVJgutpiDl62HNbn2gWGNpd7Tk/pubhtml There were some changes to the conf file between sets of data but I didn't keep notes about changes and dates etc however it seems that the proportion of ALLOWED lines went down a little which suggests more spam was stopped - but conversely, the proportion of delivered spams compared to SD lines went up a little - which I don't quite understand . . Now I want to try and stop the delivered spams that have invalid email addresses - I have compiled and installed spamdyke-qrv OK and set "reject-recipient" to "invalid" but these spams are still getting through and then being bounced and since the return address is bogus I get a postmaster message that the bounce has failed eg for the address: jackspr...@pricom.com.au - suggestions? Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
