Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-28 Thread Sam Clippinger
Excellent!  I see the problem now -- I'll get it fixed right away.

Thanks!

-- Sam Clippinger

John Devenport wrote:
> I've looked better, the error comes when I enter an address of this form:
>
> rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 250 ok
>
> Tell me if you can reproduce that.
> Thank you.
>
> Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
>   
>> This sounds like a bug, but I'm not able to reproduce this with 4.0.8 or 
>> 4.0.5.  I created a recipient blacklist file that contained one line:
>> @example.com
>> Then I created a recipient whitelist file that contained one line:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Then I attempted to deliver a message to a single recipient:
>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The recipient is rejected every time.
>>
>> Is it possible the allowed recipients are being accepted for some other 
>> reason (e.g. the IP address is whitelisted, the remote server 
>> authenticated)?  You could also try turning up your logging level to see 
>> which filter is being matched (or not matched) for this recipient.
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>> 
>
>  
>  
>  --
>  Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
>  
>  Sponsor:
>  Tom Raider Anniversary ora sul tuo cellulare! Entra in azione!
>  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8277&d=27-11
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-27 Thread John Devenport
I've looked better, the error comes when I enter an address of this form:

rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok

Tell me if you can reproduce that.
Thank you.

Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
> This sounds like a bug, but I'm not able to reproduce this with 4.0.8 or 
> 4.0.5.  I created a recipient blacklist file that contained one line:
> @example.com
> Then I created a recipient whitelist file that contained one line:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Then I attempted to deliver a message to a single recipient:
> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The recipient is rejected every time.
> 
> Is it possible the allowed recipients are being accepted for some other 
> reason (e.g. the IP address is whitelisted, the remote server 
> authenticated)?  You could also try turning up your logging level to see 
> which filter is being matched (or not matched) for this recipient.
> 
> -- Sam Clippinger

 
 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Tom Raider Anniversary ora sul tuo cellulare! Entra in azione!
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8277&d=27-11
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread Sam Clippinger
You could block all unauthenticated mail from that IP address. Your 
users would have to reconfigure their MUAs to authenticate (if they 
aren't already) but that should stop the spam.

You could also turn on graylisting. Most spambots aren't smart enough to 
retry their deliveries.

-- Sam Clippinger

Marco Aurélio wrote:
> Well, i must say that i have a lot problems with the specific case:
>
> I have some customers that use one conection from my ISP and that 
> conection have just one IP, ok... i use this line on my /etc/tcp.smtp:
>
> 192.168.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",MAXCONNIP="2",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="2"
> (let's assume that IP)
>
> Ok. Then... if some of those customers get infected by some virus, 
> they send to my server large amount of e-mails, i can't block the ip, 
> because i'll block about 40 or
> maybe 50 customers and i can't block one specific user, because the 
> virus changes the user all the time like:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And of course i can't block the hole domain.
> __
> Atenciosamente,
> Marco Aurelio
> Tecnologia
> Fone: 3288-2000
> Fax: 3288-2040
> SecrelNet Informática
> www.secrel.com.br
> __
>   
>
>
> John Devenport wrote:
>> Yes, but I wanted to test both the things to find out which is better 
>> for my environment.
>> Is there anyone with the same problem?
>>
>>
>> Arthur Girardi ha scritto:
>>   
>>> If I got it right, you receive spam from external host claiming to be  
>>> from your own domain? Is that it?
>>>
>>> Wouldn't this be a case for SPF checking?
>>>
>>> Arthur
>>>
>>> 
>>
>>  
>>  
>>  --
>>  Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
>>  
>>  Sponsor:
>>  Polizza auto?
>> * Furto e incendio a soli 30 euro per 1 anno! Calcola il tuo preventivo e 
>> assicurati il risparmio! Non perdere l’occasione!
>> * 
>>  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8426&d=26-11
>> ___
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>
>>
>>   
> 
>
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread Sam Clippinger
This sounds like a bug, but I'm not able to reproduce this with 4.0.8 or 
4.0.5.  I created a recipient blacklist file that contained one line:
@example.com
Then I created a recipient whitelist file that contained one line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then I attempted to deliver a message to a single recipient:
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The recipient is rejected every time.

Is it possible the allowed recipients are being accepted for some other 
reason (e.g. the IP address is whitelisted, the remote server 
authenticated)?  You could also try turning up your logging level to see 
which filter is being matched (or not matched) for this recipient.

-- Sam Clippinger

David Stiller wrote:
> Really looks like a bug for me, if the adress just has to be the
> last part of the adress, and
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> is read as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Am 26.11.2008 um 14:50 schrieb John Devenport:
>
>   
>> Greetings,
>> I'm using spamdyke 4.05 on FreeBSD 7.0 and I receive a lot of spam  
>> with
>> recipients similar to the real users of the system, so I've  
>> blacklisted
>> the whole virtual domain and withelisted only the real users.
>> It works pretty good except for the following case:
>> If the recipient is:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> the recipient is accepted and I have a lot of useless emails in the  
>> queue.
>> If the recipient is:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> spamdyke rejects the connection as expected.
>> Is this the normal behaviour or is this a bug?
>> Thanks in advance for any help.
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http:// 
>> www.email.it/f
>>
>>  Sponsor:
>>  Gioca e vinci con Sheba!
>> * Partecipa a concorso "I sensi di un'intesa perfetta" vinci  
>> fantastici premi per il tuo gatto!   
>> *
>>  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8433&d=26-11
>> ___
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>> 
>
> David Stiller
> Technischer Support
>
> Blackbit Neue Medien GmbH
> Ernst-Ruhstrat-Straße 6 - D-37079 Göttingen
>
> tel.: +49 [551] 50675-60 - fax.: +49 [551] 50675-20
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - hotline: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Klassische Werbung und Online-Marketing: http://www.blackbit.de
> Software für Online-Marketing: http://www.go-community.de
>
> Amtsgericht Göttingen: HRB 3222
> USt-IdNr.: DE 813114917
> Geschäftsführer: Herr Stefano Viani
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread Marco Aurélio

Well, i must say that i have a lot problems with the specific case:

I have some customers that use one conection from my ISP and that 
conection have just one IP, ok... i use this line on my /etc/tcp.smtp:


192.168.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",MAXCONNIP="2",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="2"
(let's assume that IP)

Ok. Then... if some of those customers get infected by some virus, they 
send to my server large amount of e-mails, i can't block the ip, because 
i'll block about 40 or
maybe 50 customers and i can't block one specific user, because the 
virus changes the user all the time like:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

And of course i can't block the hole domain.

__
Atenciosamente,
Marco Aurelio
Tecnologia
Fone: 3288-2000
Fax: 3288-2040
SecrelNet Informática
www.secrel.com.br
__



John Devenport wrote:
Yes, but I wanted to test both the things to find out which is better 
for my environment.

Is there anyone with the same problem?


Arthur Girardi ha scritto:
  
If I got it right, you receive spam from external host claiming to be  
from your own domain? Is that it?


Wouldn't this be a case for SPF checking?

Arthur




 
 
 --

 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:

 Polizza auto?
* Furto e incendio a soli 30 euro per 1 anno! Calcola il tuo preventivo e 
assicurati il risparmio! Non perdere l'occasione!
* 
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8426&d=26-11

___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


  
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread John Devenport
Yes, but I wanted to test both the things to find out which is better 
for my environment.
Is there anyone with the same problem?


Arthur Girardi ha scritto:
> If I got it right, you receive spam from external host claiming to be  
> from your own domain? Is that it?
> 
> Wouldn't this be a case for SPF checking?
> 
> Arthur
> 

 
 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Polizza auto?
* Furto e incendio a soli 30 euro per 1 anno! Calcola il tuo preventivo e 
assicurati il risparmio! Non perdere l’occasione!
* 
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8426&d=26-11
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread Arthur Girardi
If I got it right, you receive spam from external host claiming to be  
from your own domain? Is that it?

Wouldn't this be a case for SPF checking?

Arthur

Citando John Devenport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I've tried also the 4.04, same behaviour.
>
> David Stiller ha scritto:
>> Really looks like a bug for me, if the adress just has to be the
>> last part of the adress, and
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> is read as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> Am 26.11.2008 um 14:50 schrieb John Devenport:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> I'm using spamdyke 4.05 on FreeBSD 7.0 and I receive a lot of spam
>>> with
>>> recipients similar to the real users of the system, so I've
>>> blacklisted
>>> the whole virtual domain and withelisted only the real users.
>>> It works pretty good except for the following case:
>>> If the recipient is:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> the recipient is accepted and I have a lot of useless emails in the
>>> queue.
>>> If the recipient is:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> spamdyke rejects the connection as expected.
>>> Is this the normal behaviour or is this a bug?
>>> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>
>  --
>  Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
>
>  Sponsor:
>  Check-up finanziario di Intesa Sanpaolo. Prenotalo subito online, è  
>  gratis e senza impegno.
>  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8437&d=26-11
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>


___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread John Devenport
I've tried also the 4.04, same behaviour.

David Stiller ha scritto:
> Really looks like a bug for me, if the adress just has to be the
> last part of the adress, and
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> is read as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Am 26.11.2008 um 14:50 schrieb John Devenport:
> 
>> Greetings,
>> I'm using spamdyke 4.05 on FreeBSD 7.0 and I receive a lot of spam  
>> with
>> recipients similar to the real users of the system, so I've  
>> blacklisted
>> the whole virtual domain and withelisted only the real users.
>> It works pretty good except for the following case:
>> If the recipient is:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> the recipient is accepted and I have a lot of useless emails in the  
>> queue.
>> If the recipient is:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> spamdyke rejects the connection as expected.
>> Is this the normal behaviour or is this a bug?
>> Thanks in advance for any help.
 
 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Check-up finanziario di Intesa Sanpaolo. Prenotalo subito online, è gratis e 
senza impegno.
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8437&d=26-11
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke 4.05 whitelist

2008-11-26 Thread David Stiller
Really looks like a bug for me, if the adress just has to be the
last part of the adress, and

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

is read as [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Am 26.11.2008 um 14:50 schrieb John Devenport:

> Greetings,
> I'm using spamdyke 4.05 on FreeBSD 7.0 and I receive a lot of spam  
> with
> recipients similar to the real users of the system, so I've  
> blacklisted
> the whole virtual domain and withelisted only the real users.
> It works pretty good except for the following case:
> If the recipient is:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the recipient is accepted and I have a lot of useless emails in the  
> queue.
> If the recipient is:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spamdyke rejects the connection as expected.
> Is this the normal behaviour or is this a bug?
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>
>
>  --
>  Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http:// 
> www.email.it/f
>
>  Sponsor:
>  Gioca e vinci con Sheba! 
> * Partecipa a concorso "I sensi di un'intesa perfetta" vinci  
> fantastici premi per il tuo gatto!
> *
>  Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8433&d=26-11
> ___
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

David Stiller
Technischer Support

Blackbit Neue Medien GmbH
Ernst-Ruhstrat-Straße 6 - D-37079 Göttingen

tel.: +49 [551] 50675-60 - fax.: +49 [551] 50675-20
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - hotline: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Klassische Werbung und Online-Marketing: http://www.blackbit.de
Software für Online-Marketing: http://www.go-community.de

Amtsgericht Göttingen: HRB 3222
USt-IdNr.: DE 813114917
Geschäftsführer: Herr Stefano Viani
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users