On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:21:21PM +0000, Zavras, Alexios wrote: > … on the subject of FSF “free” field: let’s make sure that FSF’s own > licenses (GPL*, LGPL*, GFDL*, etc.) are marked as “free”. I think > their site lists only licenses by others, but our table seems… > strange having an empty field for GPL’s free bit.
The FSF lists some of their own licenses, e.g. GPL-3.0 [1] but not GPL-1.0 [2]. That's part of the reason for missing entries. The other part of the reason is that the versioning for the FSF API is currently in flux [3], and until that gets sorted I think Gary is holding off on updating the tools (but it's been a while since I've checked, maybe my understanding is stale). Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GNUGPLv3 [2]: https://github.com/wking/fsf-api/issues/7 [3]: https://github.com/wking/fsf-api/issues/10 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
