Re: New License/Exception Request: Python Imaging Library License

2019-01-11 Thread J Lovejoy
Hi Mark, Philippe,

I just had a closer look at this using Alan’s handy License Diff tool, which 
gave it a close match to MIT-CMU - the only difference between this license and 
MIT-CMU is:
- “and its associated documentation” instead of just “and its documentation” in 
the first sentence (Permission to use…)
- use of the Oxford comma: “use, copy, modify, and distribute”
- a comma added after “copies”, as in: “provided that the above copyright 
notice appears in all copies, and that both…” 
- a comma after “specific” in last line, as in: “ pertaining to distraction of 
the software without specific,  written…”
- “prior permission” instead of “permission” in last sentence of first 
paragraph.

I can also see (by just doing a naked-eye analysis) how this might also match 
to a variation of the HPND.

What do the other lawyers think though about the difference between this and 
MIT-CMU?  Are these slight variations something we might simply capture with 
markup and then this license would be a valid match to MIT-CMU?

I made a new issue in Github repo to track here: 
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/750

Thanks,
Jilayne

> On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:28 AM, Philippe Ombredanne  wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark:
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:42 PM Mark Atwood via Lists.Spdx.Org
>  wrote:
>> Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
>> Python Imaging Library License
> 
> It looks to me as a proper historical permission (HPND
> https://spdx.org/licenses/HPND.html )
> This has been detected by the ScanCode toolkit as an HPND alright and
> this is within the "matching guidelines" too IMHO...
> unless this additional "prefix" is considered as creating something
> entirely new:
> "By obtaining, using, and/or copying this software and/or its associated
> documentation, you agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with
> the following terms and conditions:" ...
> 
> --
> Cordially
> Philippe Ombredanne
> 
> +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
> DejaCode - What's in your code?! - http://www.dejacode.com
> AboutCode - Open source for open source - https://www.aboutcode.org
> nexB Inc. - http://www.nexb.com
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2519): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2519
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/28745782/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: New License/Exception Request: Python Imaging Library License

2018-12-14 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
Hi Mark:

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:42 PM Mark Atwood via Lists.Spdx.Org
 wrote:
> Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
> Python Imaging Library License

It looks to me as a proper historical permission (HPND
https://spdx.org/licenses/HPND.html )
This has been detected by the ScanCode toolkit as an HPND alright and
this is within the "matching guidelines" too IMHO...
unless this additional "prefix" is considered as creating something
entirely new:
"By obtaining, using, and/or copying this software and/or its associated
documentation, you agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with
the following terms and conditions:" ...

--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne

+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode - What's in your code?! - http://www.dejacode.com
AboutCode - Open source for open source - https://www.aboutcode.org
nexB Inc. - http://www.nexb.com

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2505): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2505
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/28745782/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: New License/Exception Request: Python Imaging Library License

2018-12-13 Thread Dennis Clark
Hi Mark,

I believe that the proposed PILL addition to the SPDX license list will be
a lot easier to swallow (!!!) if you put a Version Number on it.

Regards,
Dennis Clark


On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:42 AM Mark Atwood via Lists.Spdx.Org  wrote:

> Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
>
> Python Imaging Library License
>
> Provide a proposed Short Identifier.
>
> PILL
>
> Provide a functioning url reference to the license or exception text,
> either
> from the author or a community recognized source.
>
> https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> Create and attach a text file with the license or exception text from the
> url provided in #3
>
> attached
>
> Indicate whether the license is OSI-approved (see:
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) or whether it has been
> submitted for approval to the OSI and is currently under review.
>
> Not OSI approved.  Not submitted to OSI.
>
> Provide a short explanation regarding the need for this license or
> exception
> to be included on the SPDX License List, including identifying at least one
> program that uses this license.
>
> The Python Imaging Library and the PILLOW fork are widely used.
>
> 
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2504): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2504
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/28745782/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-