[VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce
Stemming from the proposal to add a request nonce, the idea to rename the openid.nonce field to openid.response_nonce surfaced. Is this something that we should do? Vote closes Tuesday the 10th at 3:30pm PST. Votes are +1 (in support of idea), 0 (abstain), or -1 (disagree). Traditionally a -1 vote, with appropriate technical reasoning, will cause the vote as a whole to fail. In this case, I believe it will be best to make the decision tallying all votes for and against unless a strong technical argument can be made for not renaming this parameter. --David ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
RE: [VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce
Judging from a lack of responses, I'm guessing people don't really care. Is this a correct assessment? I'm +1 to this to add clarity, though also in the "don't really care" boat at the same time. --David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Recordon, David Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 5:25 PM To: specs@openid.net Subject: [VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce Stemming from the proposal to add a request nonce, the idea to rename the openid.nonce field to openid.response_nonce surfaced. Is this something that we should do? Vote closes Tuesday the 10th at 3:30pm PST. Votes are +1 (in support of idea), 0 (abstain), or -1 (disagree). Traditionally a -1 vote, with appropriate technical reasoning, will cause the vote as a whole to fail. In this case, I believe it will be best to make the decision tallying all votes for and against unless a strong technical argument can be made for not renaming this parameter. --David ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
Re: [VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce
+1 Allows us to easily have a request_nonce now or in the future and have clarity on what is what -- Dick On 9-Oct-06, at 2:19 PM, Recordon, David wrote: > Judging from a lack of responses, I'm guessing people don't really > care. > Is this a correct assessment? > > I'm +1 to this to add clarity, though also in the "don't really care" > boat at the same time. > > --David > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Recordon, David > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 5:25 PM > To: specs@openid.net > Subject: [VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce > > Stemming from the proposal to add a request nonce, the idea to rename > the openid.nonce field to openid.response_nonce surfaced. Is this > something that we should do? > > Vote closes Tuesday the 10th at 3:30pm PST. Votes are +1 (in > support of > idea), 0 (abstain), or -1 (disagree). Traditionally a -1 vote, with > appropriate technical reasoning, will cause the vote as a whole to > fail. > In this case, I believe it will be best to make the decision tallying > all votes for and against unless a strong technical argument can be > made > for not renaming this parameter. > > --David > ___ > specs mailing list > specs@openid.net > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs > > ___ > specs mailing list > specs@openid.net > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs > > ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
