[sqlalchemy] Re: 0.6 and c extensions

2010-03-22 Thread drakkan


On 21 Mar, 21:11, Gaetan de Menten gdemen...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 17:13, drakkan drakkan1...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 21 Mar, 14:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
  Le dimanche 21 mars 2010 à 02:10 -0700, drakkan a écrit :

   a really interesting feature in sa 0.6 are the c extensions, however I
   think they should be implemented using ctypes so if python ctypes
   extension is available (default in python =2.5 and available even for
   2.4) the c extensions are used as default,

  ctypes cannot compile your own C code.

  Yes I know my question is why sqlalchemy wrote his own C code and not
  use ctypes?

 Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK ctypes is a way to interface your
 Python code with external C libraries. You cannot create any new
 functionality with ctypes. And what I did for the C extension was
 rewrite in C the most speed-critical parts of *SQLAlchemy* (not of an
 external lib) !

You are right I misunderstood the implementation sorry


 I could have used cython (and I might actually rewrite what I have
 done thus far in cython at some point in the future), but ctypes???

 --
 Gaëtan de Menten

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.



[sqlalchemy] Re: 0.6 and c extensions

2010-03-21 Thread drakkan


On 21 Mar, 14:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
 Le dimanche 21 mars 2010 à 02:10 -0700, drakkan a écrit :

  Hi,

  a really interesting feature in sa 0.6 are the c extensions, however I
  think they should be implemented using ctypes so if python ctypes
  extension is available (default in python =2.5 and available even for
  2.4) the c extensions are used as default,

 ctypes cannot compile your own C code.

Yes I know my question is why sqlalchemy wrote his own C code and not
use ctypes?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.



Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: 0.6 and c extensions

2010-03-21 Thread Gaetan de Menten
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 17:13, drakkan drakkan1...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 21 Mar, 14:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
 Le dimanche 21 mars 2010 à 02:10 -0700, drakkan a écrit :

  a really interesting feature in sa 0.6 are the c extensions, however I
  think they should be implemented using ctypes so if python ctypes
  extension is available (default in python =2.5 and available even for
  2.4) the c extensions are used as default,

 ctypes cannot compile your own C code.

 Yes I know my question is why sqlalchemy wrote his own C code and not
 use ctypes?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK ctypes is a way to interface your
Python code with external C libraries. You cannot create any new
functionality with ctypes. And what I did for the C extension was
rewrite in C the most speed-critical parts of *SQLAlchemy* (not of an
external lib) !

I could have used cython (and I might actually rewrite what I have
done thus far in cython at some point in the future), but ctypes???

-- 
Gaëtan de Menten

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.