Re: [sqlite] Student's t-test table
2.011, 2.407, 2.682, 2.943, 3.269, 3.505); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('50', 1.299, 1.676, 2.009, 2.403, 2.678, 2.937, 3.261, 3.496); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('60', 1.296, 1.671, 2.0, 2.39, 2.66, 2.915, 3.232, 3.46); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('70', 1.294, 1.667, 1.994, 2.381, 2.648, 2.899, 3.211, 3.435); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('80', 1.292, 1.664, 1.99, 2.374, 2.639, 2.887, 3.195, 3.416); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('90', 1.291, 1.662, 1.987, 2.369, 2.632, 2.878, 3.183, 3.402); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('100', 1.29, 1.66, 1.984, 2.364, 2.626, 2.871, 3.174, 3.391); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('120', 1.289, 1.658, 1.98, 2.358, 2.617, 2.86, 3.16, 3.373); INSERT INTO "distribuitions" VALUES('infinity', 1.282, 1.645, 1.96, 2.326, 2.576, 2.807, 3.09, 3.291); COMMIT; regards 1966bc On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:37 AM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, > On 16 November 2014 00:28, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> if it serves to someone I have attached it >> > > Attachments don't come through, post a link to the file. > >> regards >> 1966bc >> > > Best, > jb > > > -- > --- > inum: 883510009027723 > sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info > xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Student's t-test table
if it serves to someone I have attached it regards 1966bc On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Simon, I know how to perform the importation. > However thanks of the idea. > I start looking for it. > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: >> >> On 16 Nov 2014, at 7:39am, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> do you know if a database exists in sqlite with the values, degrees of >>> fredom vs probability (alfa) of the t Student? >> >> If you can find one in text or .csv format, we can tell you how to import it. >> >> Simon. >> ___ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Student's t-test table
Thanks Simon, I know how to perform the importation. However thanks of the idea. I start looking for it. On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2014, at 7:39am, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> do you know if a database exists in sqlite with the values, degrees of >> fredom vs probability (alfa) of the t Student? > > If you can find one in text or .csv format, we can tell you how to import it. > > Simon. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] Student's t-test table
Hi to everybody, do you know if a database exists in sqlite with the values, degrees of fredom vs probability (alfa) of the t Student? I need it to calculate confidence intervals to compare two means regards bc1966 ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] -init file
thanks Simon, stupidly I have used this, sqlite can be initialized using resource files. These can be combined with command line arguments to set up sqlite exactly the way you want it. Initialization proceeds as follows: o The defaults of mode= LIST separator = "|" main prompt = "sqlite> " continue prompt = " ...> " found on http://www.linuxcommand.org/man_pages/sqlite31.html regards beppe On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > On 23 Aug 2014, at 5:28pm, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> my file, setconsole >> >> headers = ON >> mode= COLUMN >> timer = ON > > Those commands are dot commands, not proper SQLite commands. They need to > have dots in front of them. Also, having an equals sign there is incorrect. > Those lines should look more like > > .headers ON > .mode COLUMN > .timer ON > > If you are in doubt about a command try typing it into the SQLite shell tool > and see if it does what you want or gives you an error message. > > Simon. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] -init file
HI all, I am trying to open an sqlite3 shell session passing a configuration file with the option -init but the console it doesn't shape my file, setconsole headers = ON mode= COLUMN timer = ON pep@hal9000:~/test/server$ sqlite3 -init setconsole test.db SQLite version 3.7.13 Enter ".help" for instructions Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";" sqlite> select * from halflives; 1|421|530|519|37.8|37.8|6|518|Nessuna annotazione|1 2|420|530|519|35.0|37.0|2|517|Nessuna annotazione|1 3|264|530|519|4.0|8.0|7|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 4|264|526|519|-20.0|-20.0|1|517|Nessuna annotazione|1 5|264|526|519|20.0|25.0|1|514|Nessuna annotazione|1 6|105|529|520|-20.0|-20.0|2|522|Acidificare le urine|1 7|105|529|520|4.0|8.0|2|522|Acidificare le urine|1 8|105|529|520|20.0|25.0|2|521|Acidificare le urine|1 9|418|530|520|25.0|25.0|7|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 10|418|530|520|-20.0|-20.0|6|516|Nessuna annotazione|1 11|418|530|520|4.0|8.0|7|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 12|418|530|520|20.0|25.0|3|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 13|385|526|519|37.0|37.0|15|521|L'emivita biologiaca in realta' varia tra le 8 e le 15 ore|1 14|385|526|520|20.0|25.0|2|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 15|385|526|520|-20.0|-20.0|3|524|Nessuna annotazione|1 16|385|526|520|4.0|8.0|7|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 17|385|526|520|20.0|25.0|2|522|Nessuna annotazione|1 suggests? p.s. I'm on debian 6 regards beppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow
well, after an intense session of debug, we have come to understand the why of these decreases of performance. In practice in two tables on 40 they missed two indexes on a total of 50. Now adversity has wanted these two indexes to be used more or less by a lot of interrogations. Restored these the problem it is practically resolved. sqlite and python never disappoint us. It stays us the doubt however of how come such problem is amplified after having performed ANALYZE. p.s. I arrange with Keith that is difficult to change versions on you linux OS, we use debian 5 as server. I believe even that the panic doesn't often, help to resolve the problems... you excuse for the trouble regars beppe On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > > The default installation on my VPS running the current release of CentOS is > pretty old as well. Unfortunately it is kind of difficult to upgrade the > version of SQLite (and/or Python) on some Linux distributions because there > are other system dependencies on the versions of Python. For example on > CentOS there are dependencies between Python version and the package manager > (yum in the case of CentOS) making such upgrades sometimes very problematic. > > Linux X 3.15.4-x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 7 08:42:36 EDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > # python > Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Jan 22 2014, 09:42:36) > [GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4)] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>> import sqlite3 >>>> cn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:') >>>> sqlite3.version > '2.4.1' >>>> sqlite3.sqlite_version > '3.6.20' >>>> for i in range(20): > ... cn.cursor().execute('select > sqlite_compileoption_get(?);',(i,)).fetchall() > ... > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 2, in > sqlite3.OperationalError: no such function: sqlite_compileoption_get >>>> > > Also, the version of the interface module (sqlite3.py / _sqlite3.so) between > python and sqlite3 (sqlite3.so) is quite old as well (compared to the current > versions of python and sqlite3 -- though the interface has not significantly > changed in how it implements most connection/cursor operations). > > Is the command line shell of sqlite3 you are using in your testing the same > version of SQLite as the shared object being used by python? > > # sqlite3 > SQLite version 3.6.20 > Enter ".help" for instructions > Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";" > sqlite> > > If they are different, that might explain the different results between the > two depending on the versions. There have been many changes in sqlite since > version 3.6.20 which might affect performance of actually running a query, > depending on the version of the command shell in use. > > If they are the same version then the time taken to execute a select at the > command line tool interface and retrieve the results should not be > significantly different than what you see using from python calls. cursor() > methods .execute(...) corresponds to sqlite3_prepare / sqlite3_bind (if > parameters are given); .fetchone() corresponds to a single sqlite3_step and > the sqlite3_value calls necessary to retrieve a row; and, .fetchall() is > simply .fetchone() in a loop until no more rows are available and accumulates > the retrieved row tuples as a list (all executed in C code, not in python > code, so it should be relatively the same efficiency as the sqlite3 shell > tool is). > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users- >>boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Giuseppe Costanzi >>Sent: Friday, 8 August, 2014 03:14 >>To: General Discussion of SQLite Database >>Subject: Re: [sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow >> >>using putty >> >>Linux SRVXXX 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Mon Aug 30 07:01:57 UTC 2010 i686 >> >>The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software; >>the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the >>individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. >> >>Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent >>permitted by applicable law. >>You have new mail. >>Last login: Fri Aug 8 08:22:45 2014 from trantor.ia.lan >>hal9000@SRVXXX :~$ clear >>hal9000@SRVXXX :~$ python >>Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jan 24 2010, 14:53:14) >>[GCC 4.3.2] on linux2 >>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>>> import
Re: [sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow
using putty Linux SRVXXX 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Mon Aug 30 07:01:57 UTC 2010 i686 The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software; the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. You have new mail. Last login: Fri Aug 8 08:22:45 2014 from trantor.ia.lan hal9000@SRVXXX :~$ clear hal9000@SRVXXX :~$ python Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jan 24 2010, 14:53:14) [GCC 4.3.2] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import sqlite3 >>> cn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:') >>> sqlite3.version '2.3.2' >>> sqlite3.sqlite_version '3.5.9' >>> cn.cursor().execute("SELECT sqlite_version();").fetchall() [(u'3.5.9',)] >>> for i in range(20): >>> print cn.cursor().execute('SELECT >>> sqlite_compileoption_get(?);',(i,)).fetchall() >>> sqlite3.OperationalError: no such function: sqlite_compileoption_get File "", line 1 sqlite3.OperationalError: no such function: sqlite_compileoption_get On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > Giuseppe, > > What version of the sqlite3 library is python using? > >>python > Python 2.7.8 (default, Jun 30 2014, 16:03:49) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on > win32 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>> import sqlite3 >>>> cn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:') > >>>> sqlite3.version > '2.6.0' > >>>> sqlite3.sqlite_version > '3.8.6' > >>>> cn.cursor().execute('select sqlite_version();').fetchall() > [(u'3.8.6',)] > >>>> for i in range(20): > ...cn.cursor().execute('select > sqlite_compileoption_get(?);',(i,)).fetchall() > ... > [(u'DEFAULT_LOCKING_MODE=0',)] > [(u'ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA',)] > [(u'ENABLE_FTS3',)] > [(u'ENABLE_FTS3_PARENTHESIS',)] > [(u'ENABLE_FTS4',)] > [(u'ENABLE_LOAD_EXTENSION',)] > [(u'ENABLE_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT',)] > [(u'ENABLE_MEMSYS5',)] > [(u'ENABLE_RTREE',)] > [(u'ENABLE_STAT4',)] > [(u'MAX_SCHEMA_RETRY=50',)] > [(u'SOUNDEX',)] > [(u'SYSTEM_MALLOC',)] > [(u'TEMP_STORE=2',)] > [(u'THREADSAFE=1',)] > [(None,)] > [(None,)] > [(None,)] > [(None,)] > [(None,)] >>>> > >>-Original Message- >>From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users- >>boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Simon Slavin >>Sent: Thursday, 7 August, 2014 09:26 >>To: General Discussion of SQLite Database >>Subject: Re: [sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow >> >> >>On 7 Aug 2014, at 3:24pm, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>> I have finished running ANALYZE and SQLite commands are taking longer >>> only when I use python db api >>> such as >>> [...] >>> >>> however I have done what you have pointed out me and in effects the >>> speed of execution >>> from the shell is best after having performed ANALYZE >>> as I would be me expected [snip] >> >>> I have also noticed that, using python db api2 if I perform a query >>> recalling a view on the database >>> this it is slower if I directly write the query in the script of python >>> For example if I perform [...] >>> and this independently from ANALTYZE but after run ANALYZER the >>> situation worsens >> >>Very good. If you had a situation where the Shell Tool got slower on >>ANALYZE then it would definitely be an error in SQLite and we could >>investigate. But you are reporting a situation where the Shell Tool gets >>faster but Python gets slower. >> >>This makes me think that the fault is with your Python library. I don't >>know enough about Python to help. I am going to hope that someone >>familiar with Python sees this and can help you. >> >>Simon. >>___ >>sqlite-users mailing list >>sqlite-users@sqlite.org >>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > > On 7 Aug 2014, at 10:56am, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi to everybody, > > I have the following problem, on a database, 20M on a server linux, when I > > make ANALYZE all the interrogations become slow. > > I'm very sorry, but I'm having a little trouble with your English and want to > be sure I understand your report. > > While you are running ANALYZE, you can expect the system to run slowly. > ANALYZE does lots of work. After you have finished running ANALYZE, the > system should not be slower than it was before you started running ANALYZE. > > If you have finished running ANALYZE and SQLite commands are taking longer > than they did before, please tell us which version of SQLite you're running. > > If you are executing commands in your own application can you please download > the SQLite shell tool and try the same commands in that ? You can use the > following command > > .timer ON > > to make the shell tool show you timing for each command it runs. > > You should be able to reverse the results of ANALYZE using the following > commands: > > DROP TABLE sqlite_stat1; > DROP TABLE sqlite_stat2; > DROP TABLE sqlite_stat3; > DROP TABLE sqlite_stat4; > > (Some of these will give errors because different versions of SQLite create > different tables.) If you do this, and run your queries again, do they run > faster like they ran before you did ANALYZE ? > > Simon. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ok I will try to explain better I have finished running ANALYZE and SQLite commands are taking longer only when I use python db api such as def read(self, fetch, sql, args=()): try: cur = self.con.cursor() cur.execute(sql,args) if fetch == True: rs = cur.fetchall() else: rs = cur.fetchone() cur.close() return rs except Exception, e: self.handle_exception(e) however I have done what you have pointed out me and in effects the speed of execution from the shell is best after having performed ANALYZE as I would be me expected V:\>sqlite3 lab.db SQLite version 3.7.17 2013-05-20 00:56:22 Enter ".help" for instructions Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";" sqlite> .timer ON sqlite> .schema package_unloaded CREATE VIEW package_unloaded AS SELECT dict_products.dict_product_id, products.product, products.code, SUM(CASE WHEN events.category_id = 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS download, SUM(CASE WHEN packages.available = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS stock, dict_products.department_id AS department_id, strftime('%Y-%m-%d', events.log_time) AS log_time FROM dict_products INNER JOIN products ON (dict_products.product_id = products.product_id) LEFT JOIN batchs ON (dict_products.dict_product_id = batchs.dict_product_id) LEFT JOIN packages ON (batchs.batch_id = packages.batch_id) LEFT JOIN events ON (packages.package_id = events.package_id) WHERE events.enable =1 GROUP BY dict_products.dict_product_id ORDER BY products.code; sqlite> SELECT code,product,download,stock FROM package_unloaded WHERE department_id = 1 AND downl oad >0 AND log_time ...> BETWEEN '2014-04-01' AND '2014-06-30' ORDER BY code; some rows as 15439|VB12 Diluente|5|2 15440|FOL DTT Releasing Agent|6|1 15443|CKMB DIL|3|1 CPU Time: user 0.375000 sys 0.203125 sqlite> sqlite> ANALYZE; CPU Time: user 0.203125 sys 0.140625 sqlite> sqlite> SELECT code,product,download,stock FROM package_unloaded WHERE department_id = 1 AND downl oad >0 AND log_time ...> BETWEEN '2014-04-01' AND '2014-06-30' ORDER BY code; some rows as 15439|VB12 Diluente|5|2 15440|FOL DTT Releasing Agent|6|1 15443|CKMB DIL|3|1 CPU Time: user 0.25 sys 0.00 sqlite> I have also noticed that, using python db api2 if I perform a query recalling a view on the database this it is slower if I directly write the query in the script of python For example if I perform SELECT * FROM package_dowloaded WHERE department_id = ? ORDER BY code; the execution is slower if I perform SELECT dict_products.dict_product_id, products.product, products.code, SUM(CASE WHEN events.category_id = 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS download, SUM(CASE WHEN packages.available = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS stock, dict_products.department_id AS department_id, strftime('%Y-%m-%d', events.log_time) AS log_time FROM dict_products INNER JOIN products ON (dict_products.product_id = products.product_id) LEFT JOIN batchs ON (dict_products.dict_product_id = batchs.dict_product_id) LEFT JOIN packages ON (batchs.batch_id = pac
[sqlite] After ANALYZE all has become slow
Hi to everybody, I have the following problem, on a database, 20M on a server linux, when I make ANALYZE all the interrogations become slow. The database is constituted by 37 tables, 56 views and varied indexes. I use python database API 2.0 to talking with clients. Considering that the data base will quickly grow I had thought about using ANALYZE for accellerare the queries. Suggestions? Regards, beppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Date in gridview visualized in YYYY-MM-DD format:
as others have suggested you strftime('%d-%m-%Y', mytalbe.myfield) regards beppe On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Stefano Ravagniwrote: > Hello, i'm new in SQLite develop... > > i'n a gridview (.NET) i visualize the data type in -MM-DD format > > Using others database i ever see data in format which follow culture > setting (italian in this case)... but not in SQLite.. > > How could i solve ? > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] explain me EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
hi, where I can find a good documentation, of keywords in object? I would want to learn well meaning and use of opcode, p1, p2, pn ,comment and order,from,detail... I don't succeed in understanding the output of these two keywordses. wishes and good year to everybody. beppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] GROUP BY months and years using integer data
I don't know if I have understood well but the statment SUM(stats.quantity * (stats.which_month = 1)) SUM(stats.quantity * (stats.which_month = 2)) should be interpreted SUM stats.quantity IF stats.which_month = 1 is TRUE SUM stats.quantity IF stats.which_month = 2 is TRUE Am'I still in the darkness? On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 4:35 AM, RSmith <rsm...@rsweb.co.za> wrote: > Boolean Logic 101 - Feel free to skip if this is not your thread! > > - > > In addition to other replies - Boolean logic is interesting in that it has > no real arithmetic value and can have only true or false as a value. It > doesn't fit too well as a high-level storage value of a system even though > it permeates low-level storage in every way - it can't be null for > instance, but in an RDBMS it _can_ be Null and it _can_ be arithmetic by > taking on the values 0 and 1 for false and true respectively. This has the > added advantage that it can be used in arithmetic statements which is what > Igor used to save considerable amounts of typing in your query. > > Whether or not it is faster in execution than a case statement is probably > up to some testing, but I am willing to bet it is somewhat faster > considering the relative complexity of a CASE statement. > > Any statement containing a comparison operator ends up being a Boolean > statement because it can be found to either be so, or not be so. Month is > not Boolean, but (Month = January) is definitely Boolean, because the > comparison is either true or false depending on the value of "Month". > > Similarly any attribute can be Boolean if it is found to be an attribute > of an object. Giuseppe is not Boolean, but he is human and likely male, so > that: > (Giuseppe = Human) is true or 1, and > (Giuseppe = Female) is false or 0. > > For RDBMS and indeed most programming languages, any Boolean evaluated > result can directly be inferred as the arithmetic values 0 and 1 so that I > could make some programmatic assumptive statements based on it, such as: > > HumanX's fertility period recurs every (28 * (HumanX = Female)) days. This > will be 0 days for men (28 * false) = (28 * 0) = 0, and 28 for ladies as > (28 * true) = (28 * 1) = 28 in the same logic. > > Similarly your odds of balding is roughly 0.04 + (35/Age)*((HumanX = Male) > * 10) since men have a roughly 40% chance of balding by age 35 which is > about 10 times more likely than women and the odds increase with age[1]. > > > Hope this makes clear how Booleans are used mathematically in high-level > code. Have a great day! > Ryan > > > [1] - http://www.statisticbrain.com/hair-loss-statistics/ > > > > On 2013/12/21 22:24, Giuseppe Costanzi wrote: > >> ...but stats.which_month is not a boolean, it represent a month... >> >> >> > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] GROUP BY months and years using integer data
...but stats.which_month is not a boolean, it represent a month... On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > On 21 Dec 2013, at 7:45pm, Giuseppe Costanzi <giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I am not sure to have understood the Igor's solution > > > > ...SUM(stats.quantity * (stats.which_month = 1)) AS gen > > > > which is the meaning of the operator * in the statement? > > Multiply. > > It works because "stats.which_month = 1" is a boolean and therefore > evaluates to either 0 or 1. > > Simon. > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] GROUP BY months and years using integer data
thanks to all for the solutions. I am not sure to have understood the Igor's solution ...SUM(stats.quantity * (stats.which_month = 1)) AS gen which is the meaning of the operator * in the statement? regards and still thanks beppe On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:21 PM, James K. Lowdenwrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:30:50 +0200 > RSmith wrote: > > > Just move the scope of the grouping and use Nulls in stead of 0's, > > like this: > > > > SELECT stats.which_year AS year, > > SUM(CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 1 THEN stats.quantity ELSE NULL > > END) AS gen, > > ELSE NULL is the default > > sqlite> create table T ( t int not null primary key ); > sqlite> insert into T values (1) ; > sqlite> insert into T values (2) ; > sqlite> .nullvalue NULL > sqlite> select t, case t when 1 then 'one' end as tee from T; > 1|one > 2|NULL > > But I would recommend ELSE 0, on the principle that NULL arithmetic is > dodgy at best. > > BTW, "which_month" means the same as "month"; you could tack > "which" in front of any name without changing the meaning. > > --jkl > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] GROUP BY months and years using integer data
HI all, I've a table such CREATE TABLE 'stats' ( 'stat_id' INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, 'test_id' INTEGER, 'quantity' INTEGER, 'which_month' INTEGER, 'which_year' INTEGER, ) and I need to extract data with somenthing like SELECT stats.which_year AS year, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 1 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS gen, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 2 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS feb, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 3 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS mar, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 4 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS apr, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 5 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS mag, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 6 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS giu, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 7 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS lug, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 8 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS ago, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 9 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS sett, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 10 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS ott, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 11 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS nov, CASE WHEN stats.which_month = 12 THEN SUM(stats.quantity) ELSE 0 END AS dic, stats.test_id AS test_id FROM stats WHERE stats.test_id = 420 GROUP BY which_year that return this "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "71769" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "68972" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "65075" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "50605" "420" if I add which_month in th e GROUP BY clause I've "2009" "5994" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "6112" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "7046" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "5947" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6471" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6027" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5841" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3352" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6564" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "7075" "0" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6283" "0" "420" "2009" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5057" "420" "2010" "6112" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "6201" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "6890" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "5907" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6246" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5667" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5185" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3269" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5963" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6520" "0" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6162" "0" "420" "2010" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4850" "420" "2011" "5888" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "6027" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "6756" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "5889" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "6276" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5985" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4968" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3159" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5562" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5957" "0" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "5131" "0" "420" "2011" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3477" "420" "2012" "4949" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "4790" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "5608" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "4337" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4846" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4739" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3887" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "2412" "0" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4404" "0" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "4542" "0" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "3622" "0" "420" "2012" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "0" "2469" "420" finally the question is: How I can keeping months and years in the same row? what i mistake in my query? thanks for any suggestions? beppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Re: [sqlite] GROUP BY
Yeah, something like SELECT order_id,issued,reference, company, department_id, SUM(quantity) AS quantity, SUM(dispatch) AS dispatch, SUM(surplus) AS surplus FROM orders_surplus GROUP BY order_id I have however to sum quantity, dispatch and surplus fields to force the view to calculate the right values to get that this order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" becomes this order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "8""6""2" that is I want the total sum of quantity field (6+2=8), the total sum of the dispatch field (4+2=2) and the result of their subtraction (8-6=2) thanks jim On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jim Callahan < jim.callahan.orla...@gmail.com> wrote: > How to query and/or group complex SQL? > > Add the language to create a SQL VIEW before your SELECT statement: > > CREATE VIEW viewname AS SELECT [your SQL] > http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createview.html > > Then use the viewname in a second SELECT statement as you would a table. > > SELECT order_id, issued, company, dep_id, qty, dispatch, surplus > FROM viewname > WHERE order_id = 1; > > or, if necessary > > WHERE order_id = '1'; > > How to query and/or group: > ...complex SQL... > > order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" > > "2""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "2" "10" "10" "0" > > "3""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "8" "3""3""0" > > How I can group by order_id? In the example I'would return on order_id > > =1: > > > I assume your SQL is already producing the output in your example. > Hope I haven't missed your point and this helps. > > Jim > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Giuseppe Costanzi < > giuseppecosta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi to everybody, > > you excuse for the preceding mails but I have had problems with this and > I > > have had to change provider. > > However I propose my question. > > I have this query, that you also see in attachment file. > > SELECT > > orders.order_id AS order_id, > > strftime('%d-%m-%Y', orders.issued) AS issued, > > suppliers.company AS company, > > departments.department_id AS dep_id, > > order_details.quantity AS qty, > > > > SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS > > dispatch, > > > > order_details.quantity - SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 > > THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS surplus > > > > FROM orders > > INNER JOIN departments ON (departments.department_id = > > orders.department_id) > > > > INNER JOIN suppliers ON (suppliers.supplier_id = orders.supplier_id) > > INNER JOIN order_details ON (orders.order_id = order_details.order_id) > > INNER JOIN transactions ON order_details.order_detail_id = > > transactions.order_detail_id > > > > WHERE orders.state = 0 AND orders.enable =1 > > GROUP BY order_details.order_detail_id > > > > that return such as > > > > order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" > > "2""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "2" "10" "10" "0" > > "3""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "8" "3""3""0" > > > > How I can group by order_id? In the example I'would return on order_id > > =1: > > > > order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "8""6""2" > > > > any suggestions? > > > > regards beppe > > > > ___ > > sqlite-users mailing list > > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] GROUP BY
HI clemens I've resolve with SELECT order_id,issued,reference, company, dep_id, SUM(qty) AS quantity, SUM(dispatch) AS dispatch, SUM(surplus) AS surplus FROM( SELECT orders.order_id AS order_id, orders.reference AS reference, strftime('%d-%m-%Y', orders.issued) AS issued, suppliers.company AS company, orders.department_id AS dep_id, order_details.qty , SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS dispatch, order_details.quantity - SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS surplus FROM orders INNER JOIN suppliers ON (suppliers.supplier_id = orders.supplier_id) INNER JOIN order_details ON (orders.order_id = order_details.order_id) LEFT JOIN transactions ON order_details.order_detail_id = transactions.order_detail_id WHERE orders.state = 0 AND orders.enable =1 GROUP BY order_details.order_detail_id) GROUP BY order_id On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Clemens Ladisch <clem...@ladisch.de>wrote: > Giuseppe Costanzi wrote: > > order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" > > "2""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "2" "10" "10" "0" > > "3""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "8" "3""3""0" > > > > How I can group by order_id? > > By writing "group by order_id". > > > In the example I'would return on order_id =1: > > > > order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus > > "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "8""6""2" > > Also add SUM(...) where needed. > > > Regards, > Clemens > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] GROUP BY
hi to everybody, you excuse for the preceding mails but I have had problems with this and I have had to change provider. However I propose my question. I have this query, that you also see in attachment file. SELECT orders.order_id AS order_id, strftime('%d-%m-%Y', orders.issued) AS issued, suppliers.company AS company, departments.department_id AS dep_id, order_details.quantity AS qty, SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS dispatch, order_details.quantity - SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS surplus FROM orders INNER JOIN departments ON (departments.department_id = orders.department_id) INNER JOIN suppliers ON (suppliers.supplier_id = orders.supplier_id) INNER JOIN order_details ON (orders.order_id = order_details.order_id) INNER JOIN transactions ON order_details.order_detail_id = transactions.order_detail_id WHERE orders.state = 0 AND orders.enable =1 GROUP BY order_details.order_detail_id that return such as order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" "2""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "2" "10" "10" "0" "3""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "8" "3""3""0" How I can group by order_id? In the example I'would return on order_id =1: order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "8""6""2" any suggestions? regards beppe SELECT orders.order_id AS order_id, strftime('%d-%m-%Y', orders.issued) AS issued, suppliers.company AS company, departments.department_id AS dep_id, order_details.quantity AS qty, SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS dispatch, order_details.quantity - SUM(CASE WHEN transactions.category_id = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS surplus FROM orders INNER JOIN departments ON (departments.department_id = orders.department_id) INNER JOIN suppliers ON (suppliers.supplier_id = orders.supplier_id) INNER JOIN order_details ON (orders.order_id = order_details.order_id) INNER JOIN transactions ON order_details.order_detail_id = transactions.order_detail_id WHERE orders.state = 0 AND orders.enable =1 GROUP BY order_details.order_detail_id that return such as order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "6""4""2" "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "2""2""0" "2""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "2" "10" "10" "0" "3""13-11-2013" "Siemens" "8" "3""3""0" How I can group by order_id? In the example I'would return on order_id =1: order_idissuedcompany dep_id qty,dispatch surplus "1""12-11-2013" "Siemens" "1" "8""6""2" ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Syntax control
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 08:33 +0200, Giuseppe Costanzi wrote: > hi all, > could you check me the syntax of this statment? > > UPDATE batchs > SET > batchs.department_id = (SELECT > products.department_id > FROM products > WHERE > products.product_id = batchs.product_id) > > WHERE > EXISTS ( > SELECT * > FROM products > WHERE products.product_id = batchs.product_id > ) > > I would update the field named department_id on batchs table > with the values of the same field on products table. > the statement return > near ".": syntax error > but I don't see it. > Sql seems that don't digest the call to batchs.department_id > > regards > beppe resolved UPDATE batchs SET department_id = (SELECT department_id FROM products WHERE products.product_id = batchs.product_id) > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] Syntax control
hi all, could you check me the syntax of this statment? UPDATE batchs SET batchs.department_id = (SELECT products.department_id FROM products WHERE products.product_id = batchs.product_id) WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM products WHERE products.product_id = batchs.product_id ) I would update the field named department_id on batchs table with the values of the same field on products table. the statement return near ".": syntax error but I don't see it. Sql seems that don't digest the call to batchs.department_id regards beppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Update case in a transaction
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:28 -0400, Igor Tandetnik wrote: > On 3/16/2012 11:59 AM, Giuseppe Costanzi wrote: > > CREATE TRIGGER update_stocks AFTER INSERT ON transactions > > BEGIN > > UPDATE products > > SET > > products.stock =(CASE > > WHEN (transactions.flow =1 ) > > THEN SUM(products.stock + > > transactions.quantity) > > ELSE SUM(products.stock - > > transactions.quantity) > > END) > > > > WHERE products.product_id = transactions.product_id > > AND transactions.registered =1; > > END > > CREATE TRIGGER update_stocks AFTER INSERT ON transactions > BEGIN > UPDATE products SET stock = >(CASE WHEN new.flow = 1 > THEN stock + new.quantity > ELSE stock - new.quantity >END) > WHERE product_id = new.product_id > AND new.registered =1; > END; > thank you very much Igor. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] Update case in a transaction
Hi all, I would create a trigger to update a field in a table when in another table a new record is insert My scenario is products table product_id = INTEGER PK product = TEXT stock = INTEGER transactions table transaction_id = INTEGER PK product_id = INTEGER FK flow = BOOLEAN (0,1) quantitty = INTEGER registered = BOOLEAN (0,1) I've tried CREATE TRIGGER update_stocks AFTER INSERT ON transactions BEGIN UPDATE products SET products.stock =(CASE WHEN (transactions.flow =1 ) THEN SUM(products.stock + transactions.quantity) ELSE SUM(products.stock - transactions.quantity) END) WHERE products.product_id = transactions.product_id AND transactions.registered =1; END but I got a END [ near ".": syntax error ] It's the right way? what is wrong? I've never done before regards giuseppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] Between And statement too much slow
Hi, I'm using this query on my aplication to retrive a recordset that shows transactions between two date. The problem is that it's too much slow. I'm using python and the field TransactionDate is Datetime (e.g. 2008-01-01) and i passed some such parameters ('1', datetime.date(2008, 7, 1), datetime.date(2008, 7, 31)) the query look on 16750 record on tblTansactions and return 85 rows sSQL ="""SELECT tblProducts.ProductName,tblProducts.WarehouseCode,tblProducts.UnitsInStock,SUM(tblTransactions.Quantity) FROM tblProducts INNER JOIN tblTransactions ON tblProducts.ProductID=tblTransactions.ProductID WHERE tblTransactions.TransactionType = 0 AND tblProducts.WarehouseID = ? AND tblTransactions.TransactionDate BETWEEN ? AND ? GROUP BY tblProducts.ProductID ORDER BY tblProducts.ProductName""" How could improve my code? regards Giuseppe ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Extract month and year from a datetime field
Igor Tandetnik wrote: > Giuseppe Costanzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How extract the month and/or year from a datetime field? >> For example: >> >> SELECT OrderID,OrderDate >> FROM tblOrders >> > > select OrderID, strftime('%m', OrderDate) as Month, strftime('%Y', > OrderDate) as Year > from tblOrders; > > http://sqlite.org/lang_datefunc.html > > Igor Tandetnik > Thanks a lot Igor,I will looking for this. Giuseppe > > > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users