Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.8.8 expected in January
On 2015/01/10 15:50, Richard Hipp wrote: Yes, it was a compile-time omission. I have uploaded a new DLL that includes the loadable extension interface. Thank you - it works perfectly for all entries. All other tests worked well too, so no new problems to report from this side. ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.8.8 expected in January
On 1/9/15, RSmith wrote: > The pre-compiled and supplied DLL (sqlite3.dll) seem to be missing an entry > point for "sqlite3_enable_load_extension" - I do not see > any mention in the update text about altering or removing this feature so I > am assuming this might be a compile-time omission? > Yes, it was a compile-time omission. I have uploaded a new DLL that includes the loadable extension interface. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.8.8 expected in January
The pre-compiled and supplied DLL (sqlite3.dll) seem to be missing an entry point for "sqlite3_enable_load_extension" - I do not see any mention in the update text about altering or removing this feature so I am assuming this might be a compile-time omission? On 2015/01/09 19:23, Richard Hipp wrote: We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month (January). A change-log is available at https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html Please stress the code in every way you can between now and then and report any problems to this list, or directly to me. Source code snapshots and precompiled Windows DLLs can be found at https://www.sqlite.org/download.html ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.8.8 expected in January
On 1/9/15, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month >> (January). A change-log is available at >> https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html > > > Could you please provide more info about stmt_scanstatus()? > > Perhaps a concrete example might help understand better what this is used > for. > > Also, I suppose the "const char*" stats "returned" need to be freed, > perhaps with sqlite3_free()? The doc doesn't say. > The returned value is a "const" char*, so, no, it should not be passed to sqlite3_free(). It is difficult to achieve the right balance of brevity and explanation. I have your request for additional explanation, but I need to weigh that against those who prefer brevity. I work on the documentation some more. Perhaps I can find ways of achieving both goals at once. Thank you for the feedback. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] SQLite 3.8.8 expected in January
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month > (January). A change-log is available at > https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html Could you please provide more info about stmt_scanstatus()? Perhaps a concrete example might help understand better what this is used for. Also, I suppose the "const char*" stats "returned" need to be freed, perhaps with sqlite3_free()? The doc doesn't say. Thanks, --DD ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
