RE: Re[2]: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?
> As my father was fond of saying; "Money talks and BS walks." Unfortunately, that rule is decidedly invalid in the commercial software world. Bear in mind that DRH doesn't sell software, which is part of the reason why he and Encirq go about doing things differently. -T - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: Re[2]: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?
Ion, I second your comments. Personally, I think Encirq is wasting everyones time cluttering the sqlite mailing list with propaganda. Not an ideal way to gain trust or customers. I preffer the open and honest style of DRH. I also think its rude that they do this on a sqlite mailing list. Just because deviceSql uses a precompiler, doesn't mean its more reliable, faster or any of the other claims. Whereas with sqlite, it is easily tested and provable that sqlite meets its claims. Steve/Encirq, publish your api and make your product openly available for testing and evaluation. Then you might be taken more seriously. As my father was fond of saying; "Money talks and BS walks." Regards, Ken Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop the >FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest you >not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately misleading >information. I think you are very aggressive and I think you must apologise to, not only Richard, but to us (just see previous messages about DeviceSQL, full of suppositions). These were no "FUD and incorrect statements", nor "misleading information", these were only suppositions, and this is because it's hard to find real technical information or specifications on DeviceSQL, only marketing information. Maybe DeviceSQL is a good product, but absence of real info and abundance of marketing make us think and suppose various things (just see previous messages). All of us are waiting for what Richard stated: "If you view their web presentation and/or try out Encirq's products, I would be very interested to hear your impressions. Even better would be if you could blog about it." Even better if all of us can have access to this web presentation, to find out maybe more technical info about DeviceSQL. Any way, thank you. - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re[2]: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?
>We wrote Richard back in August to correct his misstatements then. He chose >to ignore the letter. August? We start to discuss about DeviceSQL some days ago, or I am wrong? - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re[2]: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of DeviceSQL?
>SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop the >FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest you >not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately misleading >information. I think you are very aggressive and I think you must apologise to, not only Richard, but to us (just see previous messages about DeviceSQL, full of suppositions). These were no "FUD and incorrect statements", nor "misleading information", these were only suppositions, and this is because it's hard to find real technical information or specifications on DeviceSQL, only marketing information. Maybe DeviceSQL is a good product, but absence of real info and abundance of marketing make us think and suppose various things (just see previous messages). All of us are waiting for what Richard stated: "If you view their web presentation and/or try out Encirq's products, I would be very interested to hear your impressions. Even better would be if you could blog about it." Even better if all of us can have access to this web presentation, to find out maybe more technical info about DeviceSQL. Any way, thank you. - To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
