Re: epoll
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On ons, 2007-08-29 at 00:34 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: After todays changes I am now getting (with --enable-epoll) Right. Question is how many will need it.. I think not, and have now killed the section which refers to the script. Builds using the (these days) undocumented --enable-epoll option without properly working epoll will now either fail or result in a non-working binary, just as is the case when enabling kqueue on a system not supporting kqueue.. I'm now getting compile problems. Under the new state does USE_POLL or HAVE_POLL have preference over runtime code? (src/structs.h:1567 versus src/stat.cc:993) Both of those have come in from HEAD over the last two merges (in their respective order). I patched earlier according to structs.h, but this has made me think again. Amos
Re: epoll
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On tor, 2007-08-30 at 13:58 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: On the side of this. I read through the PRE7 release notes and noticed that while the squid.conf changes are covered there is no comparable list of ./configure changes. Right.. any takers on writing that? I can cover the added/removed ones. It will take someone with a deeper knowledge of the actual differences between 2.6 and 3.0 to even identify the changed ones. Amos
Re: squid3 download page
fixed. On fre, 2007-08-31 at 03:49 -0400, Tsantilas Christos wrote: > Hi all, > At the squid3 download page > (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/) the squid-3.0.PRE7 link > points to the squid-3.0.PRE5 Release Notes > (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/squid-3.0.PRE5-RELEASENOTES.html) > > -- >Christos signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
squid3 download page
Hi all, At the squid3 download page (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/) the squid-3.0.PRE7 link points to the squid-3.0.PRE5 Release Notes (http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/squid-3.0.PRE5-RELEASENOTES.html) -- Christos
