I'm currently editing configure.in for my proposed QOS mark patch. From a previous list message Amos suggested the following:
>> --enable/disable-linux-netfilter will also be involved in the logics. If set to "no" then it override disables this netfilter feature. << I started to implement this, but it doesn't make much sense and could cause confusion. The 2 are independent (the mark patch does not depend on the netfilter_ipv4 header). Therefore, I think it would be more appropriate to rename this option to --enable-nf-transparent in line with the other transparent options (enable-ipfw-transparent, enable-ipf-transparent, enable-pf-transparent), as it only affects the transparent proxying. >> A new --with-netfilter-conntrack option will be needed to set linking for the particular library. With path as a optional parameter, and --without meaning not to link (probably to prevent the code building as well). << I agree with this. This should be the option to enable it (along with --enable-zph-qos). [[ Sorry I'm unable to reply to the original message, as I am not yet on the mailing list. Subscription request is with the moderator ]] Thanks, Andy