Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> There is also this one with a few more items:
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-3.1#head-533b554b1cc28966bbe9409b58a19bb1fe2ee7f1
> 
> Speaking of which.
> Adrian:
>   You added the Comm-Layer re-write as first on that list. Is the code
> ready to be patched on immediately after the branching? or is there
> going to be a development delay while it gets written and tested?

Its not ready immediately after the branching, no. I think it'll require
a lot more planning than "adrian sitting at home working on stuff in
his spare time" - that works fine for stuff like store_copy and the
logfile daemon stuff, but not for something slightly more complicated
than this.




Adrian



Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:30 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
>> > squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
>> >
>> > Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
>> > wait until the first stable release?
>>
>> I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
>> we're in agreement its stable and
>
> I have no opinion on this part yet. I think folks with big pending
> Squid3 patches or branches should decide.
>
>>  there's a TODO list for 3.1.
>
> Deciding what to do in v3.1 should not affect branching v3.0 out, IMO.
> My understanding is that once v3.0 is branched out, it is closed for any
> significant development other than bug fixes. What features or changes
> will eventually be in v3.1 should not affect that, should it?
>
> We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED
>
> This is not exact, complete, or comprehensive (e.g., I assume IPv6
> support will be in v3.1 but ESI may not be), but can be a good starting
> point for the discussion.

There is also this one with a few more items:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-3.1#head-533b554b1cc28966bbe9409b58a19bb1fe2ee7f1

Speaking of which.
Adrian:
  You added the Comm-Layer re-write as first on that list. Is the code
ready to be patched on immediately after the branching? or is there
going to be a development delay while it gets written and tested?

Amos




Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:30 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:  
> > squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
> > 
> > Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
> > wait until the first stable release?
> 
> I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
> we're in agreement its stable and

I have no opinion on this part yet. I think folks with big pending
Squid3 patches or branches should decide.

>  there's a TODO list for 3.1.

Deciding what to do in v3.1 should not affect branching v3.0 out, IMO.
My understanding is that once v3.0 is branched out, it is closed for any
significant development other than bug fixes. What features or changes
will eventually be in v3.1 should not affect that, should it?

We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED

This is not exact, complete, or comprehensive (e.g., I assume IPv6
support will be in v3.1 but ESI may not be), but can be a good starting
point for the discussion.

Thanks,

Alex.




Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
>>
>> >Alex tells me that its time to release Squid-3 RC1.  I plan to start
>> >the process tonight.  If all goes well it should be done and
>> >announceable in 24-48 hours.
>>
>> squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
>>
>> Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
>> wait until the first stable release?
>
> I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
> we're in agreement its stable and there's a TODO list for 3.1.
>

+1 for me.

Amos




Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
> 
> >Alex tells me that its time to release Squid-3 RC1.  I plan to start
> >the process tonight.  If all goes well it should be done and
> >announceable in 24-48 hours.
> 
> squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
> 
> Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
> wait until the first stable release?

I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
we're in agreement its stable and there's a TODO list for 3.1.



Adrian



Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Guido Serassio

Hi,

At 19.14 01/10/2007, Duane Wessels wrote:


squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.

Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
wait until the first stable release?


I like to wait for the first stable release before any CVS branch, 
now all developers should work only for one goal: the first Squid 3.0 
stable release. There will be time to "play" with coding.


Regards

Guido



-

Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1   10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135  Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/



Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Duane Wessels




On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:


Alex tells me that its time to release Squid-3 RC1.  I plan to start
the process tonight.  If all goes well it should be done and
announceable in 24-48 hours.


squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.

Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree?  Or would folks rather
wait until the first stable release?

DW


Re: RC1 time

2007-10-01 Thread Kinkie
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:45 -0600, Duane Wessels wrote:
> Alex tells me that its time to release Squid-3 RC1.  I plan to start
> the process tonight.  If all goes well it should be done and
> announceable in 24-48 hours.

Hooraaay!

Congratulations to all who contributed to getting here.


Kinkie


RC1 time

2007-09-30 Thread Duane Wessels

Alex tells me that its time to release Squid-3 RC1.  I plan to start
the process tonight.  If all goes well it should be done and
announceable in 24-48 hours.

DW