Re: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches
Hi Henrik, Il 23.39 23/10/2006 Henrik Nordstrom ha scritto: Any other takers for bugfixes for 2.6.STABLE5? You'll have until wednesday evening. After that the tree will be locked for release. (which means don't commit anything after that until the release without an OK from me). I'm preparing to fix some remaining minor TODOs in the COSS code, but I'm not sure to be ready before the deadline. The Windows COSS support for now is delayed, too much intrusive changes to disk.c. Regards Guido - Guido Serassio Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Re: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches
mån 2006-10-23 klockan 00:00 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: 2.6.STABLE5 is approaching. Estimated release date next weekend. Part of this I'd like some help to verify the patch for Bug #1779 (aka the commloops-2_6 branch) before that. This patch attempts to fix delay pools again, providing fairness between multiple connections fighting for bandwidth. This also allows poll/select to be converted to the new comm frameworks ensuring that all 4 comm loops works the same.. Now in Squid-2.6. But could use some more testing still.. I am fairly confident it will work in all the comm loops, but... Looking in Bugzilla I find Bug #1790, WCCP2 assignment method. Steven, is this patch ready for commit? Any other takers for bugfixes for 2.6.STABLE5? You'll have until wednesday evening. After that the tree will be locked for release. (which means don't commit anything after that until the release without an OK from me). Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
RE: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches
tis 2006-10-24 klockan 08:04 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton: I'll commit it, as there's no reason I can give for the second crash unless something else was changed. If you see improvements in your tests, and that you are confident it won't break other configurations using hash assignment then it's sufficient for me. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
RE: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches
-Original Message- From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2006 5:40 AM To: Squid Developers Cc: Steven Subject: Re: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches mån 2006-10-23 klockan 00:00 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: 2.6.STABLE5 is approaching. Estimated release date next weekend. Part of this I'd like some help to verify the patch for Bug #1779 (aka the commloops-2_6 branch) before that. This patch attempts to fix delay pools again, providing fairness between multiple connections fighting for bandwidth. This also allows poll/select to be converted to the new comm frameworks ensuring that all 4 comm loops works the same.. Now in Squid-2.6. But could use some more testing still.. I am fairly confident it will work in all the comm loops, but... Looking in Bugzilla I find Bug #1790, WCCP2 assignment method. Steven, is this patch ready for commit? Any other takers for bugfixes for 2.6.STABLE5? You'll have until wednesday evening. After that the tree will be locked for release. (which means don't commit anything after that until the release without an OK from me). I'll commit it, as there's no reason I can give for the second crash unless something else was changed. Steven. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/2006
