Re: Squid-dev subscription
Am Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:17:41 -0600 schrieb Alex Rousskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FWIW, ICAP request satisfaction mode seems to be working in Squid3, > using squid3-icap branch. I see random crashes because ICAPModXact::parseHead throws an exception. This always happens if there are no headers to parse at all (maybe because of a bug on the server side). #11 0x08113ce9 in __cxa_throw () #12 0x0813ca7f in Throw () #13 0x0813f435 in ICAPModXact::parseHead () #14 0x08141f5e in ICAPModXact::parseIcapHead () #15 0x0814229a in ICAPModXact::parseHeaders () #16 0x08142675 in ICAPModXact::parseMore () #17 0x081427ae in ICAPModXact::handleCommRead () #18 0x08146161 in ICAPXaction::noteCommRead () #19 0x081462cd in ICAPXaction_noteCommRead () #20 0x080ed2cc in commio_call_callback () #21 0x080ed318 in commio_call_callbacks () #22 0x080efa19 in CommDispatcher::dispatch () #23 0x0808b815 in EventLoop::runOnce () #24 0x0808b941 in EventLoop::run () #25 0x080bd877 in main () Gernot -- office: g.tenchio_AT_telco-tech_DOT_de http://www.telco-tech.de/ privat: gernot_AT_tenchio_DOT_dehttp://www.tenchio.de/ I have discovered that there are two types of command interfaces in the world of computing: good interfaces and user interfaces. -- D. J. Bernstein
Re: Squid-dev subscription
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 20:50 +0200, Gernot Tenchio wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:22:20 +0200 > "Moshe Beeri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All Squiders, > > > > In the following couple of weeks I will post some new features that are > > needed for parental control, as well as context connectivity from > > req_mod to resp_mod. > > But the major change I made is to add the ability to direct response to > > client in case that classification is already known at req_mod. > > > > The changes I made are on 2.5 Stable 10. > > I hope you will be able to use those features to Squid benefit. > > > > Thanks allot, > > > > Moshe Beeri. > > SW Engineer, PureSight Technologies. > > > > Hmmh, I had no luck to get error messages displayed as part of REQMOD > responses (squid-icap 2.6). Does it meen this will work in the future? Does > the patch appear in icap-2_6 too? FWIW, ICAP request satisfaction mode seems to be working in Squid3, using squid3-icap branch. Alex.
Re: Squid-dev subscription
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 21:53 +0200, Gernot Tenchio wrote: > My name is Gernot. I'm a developer from Germany and I'm interested in getting > the ICAP part of Squid to work. Currently I'm tried to get things working > with Squid's 2.6er icap branch and with Squid3 as well. Both versions worked > more or less for me, but I think it (c|sh)ould be improved. Hi Gernot, Glad you are interested in ICAP. FWIW, quite a few ICAP bugs have been recently fixed on squid3-icap branch of Squid CVS tree. You may want to use that branch as a base for your work. Currently, I am not aware of any serious ICAP-specific bugs except for OPTIONS response processing, but I am sure there are a few. If you know of any ICAP problems, please post here or, better, submit a bug report. I may be able to help. An avalanche of bug reports notwithstanding, I hope squid3-icap will be ready for HEAD integration by the end of this week. My longer-term goal is to make Squid3/ICAP stable for the Squid3 stable release. HTH, Alex.
Re: Squid-dev subscription
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:22:20 +0200 "Moshe Beeri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All Squiders, > > In the following couple of weeks I will post some new features that are > needed for parental control, as well as context connectivity from > req_mod to resp_mod. > But the major change I made is to add the ability to direct response to > client in case that classification is already known at req_mod. > > The changes I made are on 2.5 Stable 10. > I hope you will be able to use those features to Squid benefit. > > Thanks allot, > > Moshe Beeri. > SW Engineer, PureSight Technologies. > Hmmh, I had no luck to get error messages displayed as part of REQMOD responses (squid-icap 2.6). Does it meen this will work in the future? Does the patch appear in icap-2_6 too? Regards, Gernot
RE: Squid-dev subscription
Hi All Squiders, In the following couple of weeks I will post some new features that are needed for parental control, as well as context connectivity from req_mod to resp_mod. But the major change I made is to add the ability to direct response to client in case that classification is already known at req_mod. The changes I made are on 2.5 Stable 10. I hope you will be able to use those features to Squid benefit. Thanks allot, Moshe Beeri. SW Engineer, PureSight Technologies. -Original Message- From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 5:47 PM To: Gernot Tenchio Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: Squid-dev subscription On Fri, Oct 20, 2006, Gernot Tenchio wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Gernot. I'm a developer from Germany and I'm interested in getting > the ICAP part of Squid to work. Currently I'm tried to get things working > with Squid's 2.6er icap branch and with Squid3 as well. Both versions worked > more or less for me, but I think it (c|sh)ould be improved. Welcome! :) More ICAP developers are always welcome. Adrian
Re: Squid-dev subscription
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006, Gernot Tenchio wrote: > Hi, > > My name is Gernot. I'm a developer from Germany and I'm interested in getting > the ICAP part of Squid to work. Currently I'm tried to get things working > with Squid's 2.6er icap branch and with Squid3 as well. Both versions worked > more or less for me, but I think it (c|sh)ould be improved. Welcome! :) More ICAP developers are always welcome. Adrian
Squid-dev subscription
Hi, My name is Gernot. I'm a developer from Germany and I'm interested in getting the ICAP part of Squid to work. Currently I'm tried to get things working with Squid's 2.6er icap branch and with Squid3 as well. Both versions worked more or less for me, but I think it (c|sh)ould be improved. Regards, Gernot -- Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. -- Rich Cook
RE: Your squid-dev subscription
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Li, Qing wrote: I saw on the Todo's list an item for IPv6. Do you know if anyone else is working on this? I was hoping that I could help making Squid IPv6 capable. Thanks, -- Qing You are wery welcome to help with making Squid IPv6 capable. To my knowledge there is no developers actively working on this at this time. There exists an IPv6 branch for Squid-2.5 on devel.squid-cache.org, but it hasn't been touched in a while. http://devel.squid-cache.org/stale_projects.html#ipv6 Regards Henrik
Re: squid-dev subscription
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Bjoern JACKE wrote: > I use squid myself and want to see and help getting squid full IPv6 > support. Please add me to squid-dev. Thanks! This is very much needed. The IPv6 project is currently dormant with no active developers. >From what I understand the IPv6 implementation for Squid-2.5 is mostly complete but is bitrotting somewhat due to lack of maintenance. The work to port forward / reimplement IPv6 support for Squid-3 has not even started. Information on the development model and tools we use can be found on the devel.squid-cache.org web site. If there is any questions regarding Squid or the development model please as here on squid-dev. Regards Henrik
squid-dev subscription
Hi, as I have to say why I want to join squid-dev: I use squid myself and want to see and help getting squid full IPv6 support. Please add me to squid-dev. Regards Bjoern
