Re: buildfarm builds for squid-2?

2009-08-18 Thread Amos Jeffries

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

mån 2009-08-17 klockan 08:20 +1000 skrev Robert Collins:

I thought I'd just gauge interest in having 2.HEAD and 2.CURRENT tested
in the buildfarm. For all that most development is focused on 3, there
are still commits being done to 2.x, and most of the hard work in the
buildfarm is setup - which is now done.


Sounds like a good idea.

A "make distcheck" with per host supplied DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS
should be quite sufficient.


Added 2.HEAD and 2.7 jobs with just a bootstrap, configure, and distcheck.

Some code issues need to be fixed. See Hudson FreeBSD report posts for 
detail.


Also, some basic build-deps missing from the CentOS machine means I've 
had to make FreeBSD the master on Squid-2 jobs for now.


Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13


Re: buildfarm builds for squid-2?

2009-08-16 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2009-08-17 klockan 08:20 +1000 skrev Robert Collins:
> I thought I'd just gauge interest in having 2.HEAD and 2.CURRENT tested
> in the buildfarm. For all that most development is focused on 3, there
> are still commits being done to 2.x, and most of the hard work in the
> buildfarm is setup - which is now done.

Sounds like a good idea.

A "make distcheck" with per host supplied DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS
should be quite sufficient.

Regards
Henrik



buildfarm builds for squid-2?

2009-08-16 Thread Robert Collins
I thought I'd just gauge interest in having 2.HEAD and 2.CURRENT tested
in the buildfarm. For all that most development is focused on 3, there
are still commits being done to 2.x, and most of the hard work in the
buildfarm is setup - which is now done.

-Rob


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part