Re: [squid-users] 'Intercept' option on Windows

[Yuri Voinov]

If this has not been done yet, it is impossible or not necessary.

PS. You always can setup VirtualBox (www.virtualbox.org) on your Windows
box, set up Linux/*BSD/Solaris inside and make all you want in guest OS.

07.05.2017 3:08, Tobias Tromm пишет:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
> I am using squid on Windows (http://squid.diladele.com/), but, they
> don't compile it with support to 'intercept' option.
>
>
> Is that possible to enable it for Windows on current version?
>
>
> I am using a very old version 2.7STABLE 8 with support 'transparent'
> option on Windows, available here:
> http://squid.acmeconsulting.it/download/dl-squid.html
>  (maybe someone
> who understand how it works, can port these option from the old system
> to the new system, I don't know exactly...).
>
>
> Based on Squid documentation there is these options, but they dont
> apply to Windows:
>
>
> -
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy#Concepts_of_Interception_Caching
> :
>
>  *
>
> For Linux configure Squid with the --enable-linux-netfilter option.
>
>  *
>
> For *BSD-based systems with IP filter configure Squid with the
> --enable-ipf-transparent option.
>
>  *
>
> If you're using OpenBSD's PF configure Squid with
> --enable-pf-transparent
>
> Here is how diladele compile it:
>
>
> https://docs.diladele.com/tutorials/build_squid_windows/index.html
>
>
> If someone can help, thanks!
>
>
>
>
> ___
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-- 
Bugs to the Future


0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[squid-users] 'Intercept' option on Windows

[Tobias Tromm]

Hi Guys,


I am using squid on Windows (http://squid.diladele.com/), but, they don't 
compile it with support to 'intercept' option.


Is that possible to enable it for Windows on current version?


I am using a very old version 2.7STABLE 8 with support 'transparent' option on 
Windows, available here: http://squid.acmeconsulting.it/download/dl-squid.html 
(maybe someone who understand how it works, can port these option from the old 
system to the new system, I don't know exactly...).


Based on Squid documentation there is these options, but they dont apply to 
Windows:


- 
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy#Concepts_of_Interception_Caching
 :

  *   For Linux configure Squid with the --enable-linux-netfilter option.

  *   For *BSD-based systems with IP filter configure Squid with the 
--enable-ipf-transparent option.

  *   If you're using OpenBSD's PF configure Squid with --enable-pf-transparent

Here is how diladele compile it:


https://docs.diladele.com/tutorials/build_squid_windows/index.html


If someone can help, thanks!


___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth

[joseph]

you have to mark packet on mangle the DSCP(tos) = 12  first did you
and in squid  add   qos_flows tos local-hit=0x30 miss=0xFF

and in queues pic the marked packet name so  it will serve the cached HIT to
your clients
if you can not do it  i help u out



--
View this message in context: 
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Cache-to-Users-at-Full-Bandwidth-tp4682314p4682320.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth

[christian brendan]

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 1:00 PM, 
wrote:

> Send squid-users mailing list submissions to
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> squid-users-requ...@lists.squid-cache.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> squid-users-ow...@lists.squid-cache.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of squid-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (christian brendan)
>2. Re: Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (Yuri Voinov)
>3. Re: Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (Antony Stone)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:18:33 +0100
> From: christian brendan 
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org,
> squid-users-ow...@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth
> Message-ID:
>  gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Squid Version 3.5.20
> Cento 7
> Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1
> Users IP: 192.168.1.0/24
> Squid ip: 192.168.2.1
>
> Traffic to squid is routed
>
> i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server, i
> have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.
>
> Any guide will be appreciated.
>
> Best Regards
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:  attachments/20170505/f49ed72e/attachment-0001.html>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 23:46:29 +0600
> From: Yuri Voinov 
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/
>
>
> 05.05.2017 21:18, christian brendan пишет:
> > Squid Version 3.5.20
> > Cento 7
> > Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1
> > Users IP: 192.168.1.0/24 
> > Squid ip: 192.168.2.1
> >
> > Traffic to squid is routed
> >
> > i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server,
> > i have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.
> >
> > Any guide will be appreciated.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > squid-users mailing list
> > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
> --
> Bugs to the Future
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:  attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.html>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: 0x613DEC46.asc
> Type: application/pgp-keys
> Size: 2437 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:  attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.key>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 473 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL:  attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 19:04:39 +0100
> From: Antony Stone 
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth
> Message-ID: <201705051904.39473.antony.st...@squid.open.source.it>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> On Friday 05 May 2017 at 16:18:33, christian brendan wrote:
>
> > Squid Version 3.5.20
> > Cento 7
> > Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1
> > Users IP: 192.168.1.0/24
> > Squid ip: 192.168.2.1
> >
> > Traffic to squid is routed
> >
> > i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server, i
> > have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.
>
> How does it "not seem to be working"?
>
> A "queue" on the Mikrotik would normally be used to restrict bandwidth, not
> increase it.  Please give details of how you have implemented this queue.
>
> A few further questions:
>
> 1. Is Squid running on the Routerboard, or on a rather more capable
> machine?
>
> 2. If the client machines access the Internet directly (ie: not via
> Squid), do
> they also go via the Routerboard?
>
> 3. How are you measuring bandwidth for the clients?
>
>
> Antony.
>
> --
> I thought I had type A blood, but it turned out to be a typo.
>
>Please reply to the
> list;
>  please *don't* CC
> me.
>
>
> --
>
> Su