Re: [squid-users] Error during make when using --enable-snmp on squid-25.STABLE14
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: tor 2006-06-29 klockan 15:07 +0800 skrev SSCR Internet Admin: I have a working current stable release of squid when i decided to recompile to use snmp feature, but i bumped on this error during make, snmp_core.o(.text+0x72): In function `snmpConnectionOpen': /downloads/squid-2.5.STABLE14/src/snmp_core.c:357: undefined reference to `theInSnmpConnection' ..snippet FreeBSD using distcc / ccache to compile? Try compile without any distcc / ccache wrappers. Regards Henrik No, Im using CentOS 4.3 64bit -- All messages that are coming from this domain is certified to be virus and spam free. If ever you have received any virus infected content or spam, please report it to the internet administrator of this domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [squid-users] What does squid call items in its' cache?
John Oliver wrote: I want to purge some (or even all) of the stuff in squid's cache. But every possible name I've passwd with squidclient gets rejected with a 404. I've tried *, www.mydomain.com, http://www.mydomain.com, http://www.mydomain.com/*... nothing is working. Is there a way to list the cache? Hello Oliver, You can try with purge tool to solve your problem.The purge tool is a kind of magnifying glass into your squid-2 cache. You can use purge to have a look at what URLs are stored in which file within your cache. The purge tool can also be used to release objects which URLs match user specified regular expressions. A more troublesome feature is the ability to remove files squid does not seem to know about any longer. For more details of purge tool at: http://www.wa.apana.org.au/~dean/squidpurge/ -- Thanks, Visolve Squid Team, http://squid.visolve.com
Re: [squid-users] Strange behaviour with squid
tor 2006-06-29 klockan 14:16 +0200 skrev Luca Manganelli: When I access to internet from a PC with Firefox, an authentication window appears: Please write username and password for proxy on testproxy:3128 I write user and pwd, but the same window appears. If I press ESC (close window), another window appears: Please write username and password for proxy Squid Test Proxy on testproxy:3128 What is your auth_param settings in squid.conf? Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
[squid-users] caching higher memory objects. [signed]
Hi, Is there a way I could cache some selective objects only higher than that set in maximum_object_size ? Well, my intention is to cache the msn-installation file, which is beyond the maximum_object_size(8mb). I will appreciate your suggestion. regds, Rajen. -- - [ SECURITY NOTICE ] - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For your security, [EMAIL PROTECTED] digitally signed this message on 30 June 2006 at 09:14:23 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhzcXVpZC11c2Vyc0BzcXVpZC1jYWNoZS5vcmcAcmFqZW5k cmFAc3ViaXN1Lm5ldC5ucABlbWFpbCBib2R5ANwAAAB8AHwBb+ukRNwA AACbAwACAAIAAgAge41wR4L+bXcWdThKam3FEHwmE/qn1pYTspEfujVuk+0BAHcW 34bSvF8RoB15amIjv339V+ZaGrEv2mG92v+dvY8ReO6Wrug5baVNERPKu9XY/KEU 8qv8tyVSKGxnBpSWBTA7O4zCU2lnRW5k -- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] --
Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 11:32 +0545 skrev Rajendra Adhikari [c]: Is there a way, I can cache the larger objects (8MB) of my choice to cache by the squid. Not really. It's a global limit applying to all objects. You might be able to play some games with no_cache to block caching of responses with a content-length header larger than your preferred limit below the global limit, but it's not entirely reliable as not all downloads have a content-length specified. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] Error during make when using --enable-snmp on squid-25.STABLE14
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 14:01 +0800 skrev SSCR Internet Admin: No, Im using CentOS 4.3 64bit Are you using distcc / ccache? Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
Hi, If I increase the cache object size to 16 mb , does it degrade the performance of cache . Thanks in advance, regards, eswari - Original Message - From: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rajendra Adhikari [c] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
Re: [squid-users] OWA reverse proxy with 2.6RC2
Hello list, This first my message here but I'm the author of the original question :-) I finally succeed in reverse proxying OWA adding the login=PASS option to my cache_peer directive. For future reference, here is the complete line: cache_peer exchange-fe.local.mysite parent 80 0 front-end-https=on \ originserver proxy-only connection-auth=off login=PASS Adding RPC_IN_DATA and RPC_OUT_DATA to the extension_methods gives me rpc over http capability which is definitely great. Many thanks for you help! I'm now trying to reverse proxy a second url (with another backend) on the same box using an IP alias on the squid server. The backend is using https protocol so I setup the following cache_peer for this backend: cache_peer backend.local.mysite parent 443 0 originserver proxy-only connection-auth=off ssl cafile=path_to_ca_of_backend However, the squid -k parse returns: parse_peer: token='cafile=/path_to_ca_of_backend' FATAL: Bungled squid.conf line 559: cache_peer backend.local.mysite parent 443 0 originserver proxy-only connection-auth=off ssl cafile=/path_to_ca_of_backend Squid Cache (Version 2.6.RC2-20060628): Terminated abnormally. Is this cafile= option already implemented on this 2.6RC2 or am I doing something wrong? Many thanks. Best Regards, Benjamin Constant The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 15:45 +0545 skrev Eswari Pd. Sharma: If I increase the cache object size to 16 mb , does it degrade the performance of cache . Not really no. But it will make larger objects cached, which may change your hit rate in either direction (too small cache - lower hit rate, sufficiently large cache - better hit rate). Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] OWA reverse proxy with 2.6RC2
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 12:15 +0200 skrev Constant, Benjamin: Is this cafile= option already implemented on this 2.6RC2 or am I doing something wrong? Documentation error.. the option is named sslcafile= Fixing this now. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
Well, if I had a maximum_object_size of 8 MB and I decrease it to 4 MB, what will happen to the objects of 5MB ? Will it be accounted as hit objects until it is stale? Is three a way I can explicitly download an object (larger than maximum_cache_size) and tweak it someway to act as a cached object? Thanking you, Rajendra Adhikari Henrik Nordstrom wrote: fre 2006-06-30 klockan 11:32 +0545 skrev Rajendra Adhikari [c]: Is there a way, I can cache the larger objects (8MB) of my choice to cache by the squid. Not really. It's a global limit applying to all objects. You might be able to play some games with no_cache to block caching of responses with a content-length header larger than your preferred limit below the global limit, but it's not entirely reliable as not all downloads have a content-length specified. Regards Henrik -- - [ SECURITY NOTICE ] - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] For your security, [EMAIL PROTECTED] digitally signed this message on 30 June 2006 at 11:07:04 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhoZW5yaWtAaGVucmlrbm9yZHN0cm9tLm5ldCwgc3F1aWQt dXNlcnNAc3F1aWQtY2FjaGUub3JnAHJhamVuZHJhQHN1YmlzdS5uZXQubnAAZW1h aWwgYm9keQDDAgAAfAB8AQAAANgFpUTDAgAACAMAAgACAAIAIHuNcEeC/m13 FnU4SmptxRB8JhP6p9aWE7KRH7o1bpPtAQB3Ft+G0rxfEaAdeWpiI799/VfmWhqx L9phvdr/nb2PEXAY1/noi6n2YaxS81jYj7vgiio0T6hIqWf/ygWA02h7U2lnRW5k -- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] --
Re: [squid-users] About squid cache object size. [signed]
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 16:53 +0545 skrev Rajendra Adhikari [c]: Well, if I had a maximum_object_size of 8 MB and I decrease it to 4 MB, what will happen to the objects of 5MB ? Will it be accounted as hit objects until it is stale? Yes. Is three a way I can explicitly download an object (larger than maximum_cache_size) and tweak it someway to act as a cached object? maximum_object_size is a hard limit. No objects above this can be cached. You can only do the opposite (not cache selected objects smaller than maximum_object_size) Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] delay access to cached objects
Sir, Thanks for showing me another useful website. I did not know about this website till now. Best Regards On 29/06/06, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tor 2006-06-29 klockan 15:48 +0530 skrev Santosh Rani: Sir, I have achieved the target with your help. The setup is like this Machine 'A' (squid proxy) Machine 'B' (squid proxy) Internet Your two lines worked like magic. And is in the FAQ under How do I configure Squid forward all requests to another proxy?... url:http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#head-c050a0a0382c01fbfb9da7e9c18d58bafd4eb027 Regards Henrik -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEo+0OB5pTNio2V7IRAh2mAJ4tB+k8fSellwzu9ehHowv1NV1liwCfSNYZ UtstrmdIr8wihespginCTgU= =aSIz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[squid-users] About no_cache allow acl [signed]
Hi, Do we ever require no_cache statement with allow acl. I have seen proxy forcing cache as: acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin \? intranet acl forcecache url_regex -i kh.google mt.google keyhole.com no_cache allow forcecache no_cache deny QUERY I would like to notice on forcecache. Why do we need to force caching here. Doesn't squid cache the objects when it requires? Why do we need to force it here? I guess, it is to force cache to non-cacheable objects. Is it true? More details on this is appreciated. Does forcing cache this way overrides other options like maximum_object_size? I will highly appreciate your response. Best regds, Rajendra Adhikari. -- - [ SECURITY NOTICE ] - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For your security, [EMAIL PROTECTED] digitally signed this message on 30 June 2006 at 14:14:25 UTC. Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify. [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhzcXVpZC11c2Vyc0BzcXVpZC1jYWNoZS5vcmcAcmFqZW5k cmFAc3ViaXN1Lm5ldC5ucABlbWFpbCBib2R5ACcCAAB8AHwBwTGlRCcC AACBAgACAAIAAgAge41wR4L+bXcWdThKam3FEHwmE/qn1pYTspEfujVuk+0BAHcW 34bSvF8RoB15amIjv339V+ZaGrEv2mG92v+dvY8RaALcbvF4F/Ws+xGYp6IgYjhU dsn5/yP3Ru0o8hv7QOdaLCm3U2lnRW5k -- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] --
[squid-users] About 2.6 config options
Regarding configuration of Squid v2.6: --enable-kqueue / --disable-kqueue Given that this is an OS-specific option, shouldn't the name reflect that? I'm thinking --enable-bsd-kqueue. --enable-linux-tproxy Why use this instead of --enable-linux-netfilter on Linux 2.6.x systems? The documentation (configure comments or preliminary release notes) doesn't make clear why I would/wouldn't want to use this in preference to option --enable-linux-netfilter. --enable-truncate The configure scripts says: This uses truncate() instead of unlink() when removing cache files. Truncate gives a little performance improvement, but may cause problems when used with async I/O. Is that really universally true? I would have thought that relative truncate/unlink performance would be on a filesystem-specific basis. collapsed_forwarding There seems to be a difference of opinion here. The default v2.6 squid.conf says: Collapsed forwarding, which gives Squid the ability to intelligently merge client requests for objects into one request to the server. Of particular benefit in accelerator setups but also provides some benefits to non- accelerator setups. Yet http://devel.squid-cache.org/collapsed_forwarding/ says: This sacrifices general proxy latency in favor for accelerator performance and thus should not be enabled unless you are running an accelerator. So... who is right? Is the enabling of collapsed forwarding suitable for non-accelerator setups or not? Thanks.
[squid-users] D0ct0r rEc0mmEndati0ns
uYw4SDhdDdl8tV0XXGpcLWcMUc3UbHS464lKhykL1RiM3d1KmxE3qNOJc7tYd0GOvh7ksfmrN4TG kz3rY2m9aF558tlC3LMmfYksdK05W1jTsiX1nuXysfktBGp76qbcmY6Otlq05mZcn6HULPv6RN7PQv9 c1rRPvXT7k3cx3LGUMQ1IjkzFMbGOXYdh5NzBRtwta98rZ5NKx1nc3LIX5EeJwjcMhbUus JTXFhGbACJPotZQ6yo1yc9SZXFKIdrirMjMmCUGxakICiWRWj6qAEAkRayTu6GV5D6RbmCH 6BNV4ao3Y9TaPu9pGQfoK35hbfkbLeCf6snzn0miofT32AXK20giMUUoVl0xpacQQsh6fYDG 5LO9PYxh0Ufl0RgbI4BwVrKogbkahIVtAu6ZEFTvFjJ6mGLDzXmIkycPMyz973dglOCnHRrI5Cs8M LqK538uNGii1562yBPDzDkXqgQxFizMrDAiGdiouKbxrpa82RpCbtV6cTzjU43h4TjefCYmfLRTfx8 p1t44bv3VtKtvj0KmRTarsWt263wWdrtfquCeViiSlUw8FRZcwQDkZ47HpEtG8Qz1Pw7GhLIz 0rjDXNNJoHto8Vizqz1yHY64uz8n5wIt0271YhRtt4eRIPOlJ0HgEWHckyezu1yQWLYlOLFEFQ 4ARQKyJP9JW7vj3JixIGUZ7ZKKvC05rCeDj9pibJkx7kZqG6djRp2mR5ycvEzzKuEn1NHGvAVem
Re: [squid-users] refresh.c/refreshIsCachable buglet?
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:02:19 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: tor 2006-06-29 klockan 11:27 +0200 skrev Andreas J. Koenig: We think this is a bug. Why should 0 byte replies be less cacheable? They are not less cacheable, but there is not much use in keeping them around after expiry for conditional cache validation which is what this test is about. A zero sized object with reasonably expiry time (at least 60 seconds from now) is still cached like anything else cacheable. But according to these rules our objects have no reasonable expiration time. Typically something between 20 and 60 seconds. But that's what we really need to support, it's the nature of the application. All our objects with more than 0 bytes Content-Length are treated OK, but our objects with 0 byte Content-Length are dropped on the floor. This makes no sense. We're now planning to patch our squid to remove this chunk and hope this will solve our problems. Are we missing something? You are welcome to if this helps you, but I think your real problem is elsewhere (lack of proper expiry information in the responses or similar). Meanwhile we have removed the three lines and now squid delivers HITs on our empty objects. Very nice. At least for us! We feel sorry for our downstream squids who would also benefit from this fix. I think, we have not any wrong header information, just an unusual short expiration time (this is a news ticker, so we cannot go higher) and frequent objects with zero content. We could write a 0x20 or some such for empty content but in good old tradition we chose to send an empty content response. That squid does not support such an application is against the principle of least surprise. I'd be very happy, if the squid team could reconceive this as a buggy behaviour. Isn't it wonderful to improve software by just removing a few lines? -- andreas
Re: [squid-users] refresh.c/refreshIsCachable buglet?
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 17:24 +0200 skrev Andreas J. Koenig: I'd be very happy, if the squid team could reconceive this as a buggy behaviour. Isn't it wonderful to improve software by just removing a few lines? It's a tradeoff. As the comment says there is not really any benefit in refreshing 0-sized objects as the overhead is the same as a full request. I would think what you want to change is actually the 60 seconds limit a few lines earlier... this limit is suitable for normal forward proxies in most setups, but reverse proxies may have quite different requirements. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] About 2.6 config options
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 10:36 -0400 skrev Steve Snyder: Regarding configuration of Squid v2.6: --enable-kqueue / --disable-kqueue Given that this is an OS-specific option, shouldn't the name reflect that? I'm thinking --enable-bsd-kqueue. Note: In most situations you don't need to specify any of these as the configure script picks whatever it finds on your platform. The options is just there if you want to force certain conditions. --enable-linux-tproxy Why use this instead of --enable-linux-netfilter on Linux 2.6.x systems? It's not an instead. It's in addition to. --enable-linut-netfilter is required for interception. --enable-linux-tproxy is required for spoofing as the client on outgoing requests. --enable-truncate The configure scripts says: This uses truncate() instead of unlink() when removing cache files. Truncate gives a little performance improvement, but may cause problems when used with async I/O. Is that really universally true? I would have thought that relative truncate/unlink performance would be on a filesystem-specific basis. In either case performance difference is pretty marginal, and --enable-truncate may lead into problems with the cache so there is not much reason to use this.. Yet http://devel.squid-cache.org/collapsed_forwarding/ says: This sacrifices general proxy latency in favor for accelerator performance and thus should not be enabled unless you are running an accelerator. So... who is right? Both. It's a tradeoff, and depending on the traffic pattern it can be either better of worse.. there is no universal answer. Having it off makes behavior more predictable however. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
[squid-users] I f0und nic3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HkhqcGWby7doZIT91inUpqN3jtG2Nf6gmndb4TNzFLPgvBxUVmZmtxhtH8ChHlZdQxKUnr22SAsU VOXwafyrfdPbycmpyRc8hJ677VWw2LoAEFdMfLEZitPN7HgndPItMEkDqTC893YxRT9Y2J0xpECmszJ UVEc0bbOkzsM65IZkYbsRXwnROiEHiC2M34TFIWOWd8sozTEUa1SpLxx5PRyIi9uSuS7gM be6UWpBDE62RslfpI1o1gnmyiaAL4BOcSJi4WKXTmnxWHw1u1YVKyqIAQuCaoiNhtYsR0D0 cZeIsMhJvtPnpdJpsnFbixeRTm7DidYUot02TPkEVVjXS1YbBvQAFmRjindKJuEWfOec5c0x 5yoq65neWxBcVsK1pPcZR8kvWXMMhq6FfTTxCyM0xRbh3B5XXXaMcvEpvkWjUI3EV9YoxwRXOgBKD IqMTFCVZGcLnWRdW1hF27QfpeDx1OaiIDCojreh1zRvDkFhfSY3Z32Yg2L0FvHEWdUEC675G4LE7JW Iq9zxwFzImAgoo5dYRl4bx1gmgGO2NMNBn7IaY9yYyITYFnMSKtJjbw3E2nh8yUAGjRTeqPl2 RwIMdRhno4fE1zr6dJhx0578Vd1CSoK4aY67s7938cy8rJ2vk9L4jwR4FS7o30Fxm0ZduFwDzq MJc4AuEUI4kTJQF1lJQnWvZBoyuBFFAE7jxzqj0jOjew05FfmHakMd66OqiRJFV90aBgES1bQcj
[squid-users] PEOple are diffErEnt; we carE fOr all Of thEm
2SBsTHuu72gMTnqH2R7mAjlha9YuQcnXkR2KKRqfwRHV2yfShz7WxA4HsfRKRUt5zQMZSUzPF42h v3KqXQUQFHf0GCJqMACmmNuInM8qWyG54tLOLYSWnPlGkpdWTdA5NUDsNJ7mjbFYPHtNmqGTt3AFXme IQsSdClxYfaRO39jqM6wVbULScopEt8wj26uLGCiOeooo54AUHi7JqvpwqwmNDPcoVFBWN WoNluJv7tRlyYiQOeP9ucbLE9lEPtoEJNRhxzkLMzIdcEC1EUzw91LnXrxkCxbtysADbI8H fjNBnMMQ3WHOJ31GqDChyETcrSLddBdZTwCQ9bzweauQV4UlrRYZEBSk09gTlPERiefXdBka ZLKT33S7mGeXz3WhMjPtNN7WIgulB7ZCyWifgHObbUElXiW7fPhD2b0uXZPpzpjCmv7p4Sj6l7RLw jeXBPJPXQxiCbHEaLpMALlqkece8s1xyqi1BLjzVSUIJYMiLGJMZdnShUe5Atsn0kzhFqCAwpd7vtZ 8pcm8JWuZuW4iNMgNWhxFLlEJ0A3qGHs13AeRAmhnkLnS3FMNTQ28oFjD5cXhS5wc65ViUefT 5sPDn62VL9doOL3BUfUiXHb2hWymiPIzYi0t0Aep7RNTsmurBtzCIzkSVP80xC39kEsy6Po3Bl SD82bhjCpShO3KmQiGfkskQWQZE5o4RMfL2gcTi7CJOkJX43I9SZSSd7HTiTa1KijSRp6z5rfa3
[squid-users] SPAM??
Is it just me or is this list getting spammed?
Re: [squid-users] Caching large amounts of images...
don't raid0/raid5 your cache disks. squid has more cache-disks functionality that's better (faster and more secure) than raid0, and raid5 KILLS I/O performance. On 29.06.06 12:42, Chris Robertson wrote: And RAID1 is not optimal (I hesitate to say bad) for writes. Besides, cached data is very transient, and doesn't need the security that RAID1 provides. Hence, don't bother with RAID for cache disks... :o) RAID1 is fast for reads, so the more hits you have, the more it helps :) RAID1 is safe against disk outages (if you care about data in your cache). = RAID1 is OK in some cases, others are not. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
Re: [squid-users] SPAM??
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 12:39 -0400 skrev Jason Staudenmayer: Is it just me or is this list getting spammed? Thanks for the alert. Indeed a spammer have found a way around our usually very effective spam blocking rules. I'll look into this shortly. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] SPAM??
fre 2006-06-30 klockan 21:26 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: fre 2006-06-30 klockan 12:39 -0400 skrev Jason Staudenmayer: Is it just me or is this list getting spammed? Thanks for the alert. Indeed a spammer have found a way around our usually very effective spam blocking rules. I'll look into this shortly. Should be blocked now... if you receive any additional spam via the mailing list please forward the mail headers (only headers, no content or your message may get filtered as spam) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will look into it. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] Error during make when using --enable-snmp on squid-25.STABLE14
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: fre 2006-06-30 klockan 14:01 +0800 skrev SSCR Internet Admin: No, Im using CentOS 4.3 64bit Are you using distcc / ccache? Regards Henrik I dont know if i am using it, im not into programming.. can you tell me how to identify it? if i am what should i do? Thanks -- All messages that are coming from this domain is certified to be virus and spam free. If ever you have received any virus infected content or spam, please report it to the internet administrator of this domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [squid-users] Error during make when using --enable-snmp on squid-2.5.STABLE14
lör 2006-07-01 klockan 08:30 +0800 skrev SSCR Internet Admin: I dont know if i am using it, im not into programming.. can you tell me how to identify it? if i am what should i do? What does the compile line used by make look like? I.e. the few lines above the error... Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: [squid-users] Error during make when using --enable-snmp on squid-2.5.STABLE14
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: lör 2006-07-01 klockan 08:30 +0800 skrev SSCR Internet Admin: I dont know if i am using it, im not into programming.. can you tell me how to identify it? if i am what should i do? What does the compile line used by make look like? I.e. the few lines above the error... Regards Henrik gcc -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -g -o squid access_log.o acl.o asn.o authenticate.o cache_cf.o CacheDigest.o cache_manager.o carp.o cbdata.o client_db.o client_side.o comm.o comm_select.o debug.o delay_pools.o disk.o dns_internal.o errorpage.o ETag.o event.o external_acl.o fd.o filemap.o forward.o fqdncache.o ftp.o gopher.o helper.o http.o HttpStatusLine.o HttpHdrCc.o HttpHdrRange.o HttpHdrContRange.o HttpHeader.o HttpHeaderTools.o HttpBody.o HttpMsg.o HttpReply.o HttpRequest.o icmp.o icp_v2.o icp_v3.o ident.o internal.o ipc.o ipcache.o logfile.o main.o mem.o MemPool.o MemBuf.o mime.o multicast.o neighbors.o net_db.o Packer.o pconn.o peer_digest.o peer_select.o redirect.o referer.o refresh.o send-announce.o snmp_core.o snmp_agent.o ssl.o ssl_support.o stat.o StatHist.o String.o stmem.o store.o store_io.o store_client.o store_digest.o store_dir.o store_key_md5.o store_log.o store_rebuild.o store_swapin.o store_swapmeta.o store_swapout.o tools.o unlinkd.o url.o urn.o useragent.o wais.o wccp.o whois.o repl_modules.o auth_modules.o store_modules.o globals.o string_arrays.o -L../lib repl/libheap.a repl/liblru.a fs/libaufs.a fs/libufs.a auth/libbasic.a -lcrypt -L../snmplib -lsnmp -L/usr/kerberos/lib -L/usr/kerberos/lib64 -lssl -lcrypto -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lcom_err -lk5crypto -lresolv -ldl -lz -lmiscutil -lpthread -lm -lresolv -lbsd -lnsl snmp_core.o(.text+0x72): In function `snmpConnectionOpen': /downloads/squid-2.5.STABLE14/src/snmp_core.c:357: undefined reference to `theInSnmpConnection' snmp_core.o(.text+0x7d):/downloads/squid-2.5.STABLE14/src/snmp_core.c:364: undefined reference to `theInSnmpConnection' -- All messages that are coming from this domain is certified to be virus and spam free. If ever you have received any virus infected content or spam, please report it to the internet administrator of this domain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[squid-users] HOWTO accelerate WindowsUpdate
Hi, I am using squid-2.5.STABLE12 on FC3 Linux and would like to reduce the Internet traffic and accelerate for windowsupdate. I found that there were many TCP_MISS for windowsupdate (as shown below) although I set a large value for maximum object size (e.g. 600MB) and I was sure that a previous user had got the update before. 1151634455.935 9740 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 833603 GET http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3-19990518/CabPool/q329414_mdacall_x86_6455F9E15D1FD876A354AC196BCE848B4EA39180.exe? - DIRECT/69.28.145.34 application/octet-stream 1151634456.756 761 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 337 GET http://v3stats.windowsupdate.com/wutrack.bin? - DIRECT/207.46.197.117 application/octet-stream 1151634456.965 208 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 714 GET http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/CRCCif/6271_08A08E5B8A56FDC63B1EA85C7D30754FC5857DF3.cif? - DIRECT/207.46.18.94 application/octet-stream Is there any way to cache the winodwsupdate? Thanks a lot. John Mok
Re: [squid-users] HOWTO accelerate WindowsUpdate
* On 01/07/06 11:55 +0800, John Mok wrote: | Hi, | | I am using squid-2.5.STABLE12 on FC3 Linux and would like to reduce the | Internet traffic and accelerate for windowsupdate. I found that there | were many TCP_MISS for windowsupdate (as shown below) although I set a | large value for maximum object size (e.g. 600MB) and I was sure that a | previous user had got the update before. | | 1151634455.935 9740 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 | 833603 GET | http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3-19990518/CabPool/q329414_mdacall_x86_6455F9E15D1FD876A354AC196BCE848B4EA39180.exe? | - DIRECT/69.28.145.34 application/octet-stream | 1151634456.756 761 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 | 337 GET | http://v3stats.windowsupdate.com/wutrack.bin? - | DIRECT/207.46.197.117 application/octet-stream | 1151634456.965 208 10.144.11.88 TCP_MISS/200 | 714 GET | http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/CRCCif/6271_08A08E5B8A56FDC63B1EA85C7D30754FC5857DF3.cif? | - DIRECT/207.46.18.94 application/octet-stream | | Is there any way to cache the winodwsupdate? IMHO, if you have a Windows farm, it would be a big advantage to run your own local Windows Update Services Server (or whatever M$ calls it these days). Then all your Windows PCs will update from it, thereby reducing the Internet traffic. It's free from Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/updateservices/downloads/WSUS.mspx -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php -- +==+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +==+ Fuch's Warning: If you actually look like your passport photo, you aren't well enough to travel.
