Re: [squid-users] squid caching report

2009-01-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* bijayant kumar bijayan...@yahoo.com:
 Hello list,
 
 I want to have reports about the squid performance like how much
 caching is being done by Squid, how much bandwidth is being saved by
 the squid cache by returning objects from cache. I thought of cache
 manager output but my seniors want to see reports in a less complex
 format something like graph based reports. I have configured the MRTG
 graph also for the squid but most of the stuff I am not able to
 understand. 

Why not use calamaris?

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abt. Netzwerk Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-962
Hindenburgdamm 30 | 12200 Berlin


[squid-users] Problem in WCCP configuration

2009-01-16 Thread viveksnv

Hi All,

Two wccp services 80, 90 is detected by the router. 80 - outgoing, 
90-incoming. But return traffic does not comes to squid. No packets 
redirected by the service 90.


Router IOS version is
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 
12.4(13b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3). Any bug in this IOS version.


Global WCCP information:
   Router information:
   Router Identifier:   xx.xx.xx.xx
   Protocol Version:2.0

   Service Identifier: 80
   Number of Service Group Clients: 1
   Number of Service Group Routers: 1
   Total Packets s/w Redirected:1146
 Process:   0
 Fast:  0
 CEF:   1146
   Redirect access-list:15
   Total Packets Denied Redirect:   2814525
   Total Packets Unassigned:15328
   Group access-list:   -none-
   Total Messages Denied to Group:  0
   Total Authentication failures:   0
   Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0

   Service Identifier: 90
   Number of Service Group Clients: 1
   Number of Service Group Routers: 1
   Total Packets s/w Redirected:0
 Process:   0
 Fast:  0
 CEF:   0
   Redirect access-list:15
   Total Packets Denied Redirect:   3143419
   Total Packets Unassigned:17297
   Group access-list:   -none-
   Total Messages Denied to Group:  0
   Total Authentication failures:   0
   Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0

Squid configuration :

wccp2_service dynamic 80
wccp2_service_info 80 protocol=tcp flags=src_ip_hash priority=240 
ports=80

wccp2_service dynamic 90
wccp2_service_info 90 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_source 
priority=240 ports=80


But it works good in transparent mode.

Thanks in advance.

Thanks
Vk.


You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.in



Re: [squid-users] squid caching report

2009-01-16 Thread Andreev Nikita
Hi.

You can use cacti but it's MRTG-like. The best tools I know for squid
reports are sarg (which is rather popular) and lightsquid (it makes
reports a lot faster but I don't know if it's popular outside Russia).

Regards,
LPIC-1, EMCPA
Nikita Andreev



[squid-users] Squid 2.6 STABLE 6 : SubDirectory trailing slash

2009-01-16 Thread François-Xavier VIOLET
Hi, all,

I'm trying squid as a reverse proxy for a web application.

I have a problem when my URL is not ending with a trailing slash.

For example :

http://ip-proxy/test/ = OK
http://ip-proxy/test = KO, Problem

if I send the request directly to the IIS server we have :
http://ip-iis/test/ = OK
http://ip-iis/test = OK

What can I do in squid.conf to correct this problem.

I didn't find a good solution on the Internet yesterday.

Best regards.

FX



[squid-users] Squid 2.7 Chained Proxies and NTLM Pass-thru

2009-01-16 Thread vincent.blondel

hello all,

my clients should access an IIS website requesting ntlm authentication
'WWW-Authentication'. they all use ie6 and proxied through a chain of
two proxies.

the first one hosted in internal network making the whole job of
logging, validating ntlm authentication coming from all the ie's with
our internal active directories, allow/deny websites mime-types and all
kind of stuffs.

the other one hosted in dmz as making simply the job of gateway to the
internet.

Both of them are running 2.7.4

simple question .. Is that possible or not to make this surfing working
.. if yes what do I have to configure ??
Do I have to activate things like squid ntlm_auth binary,
connection-auth=on, login=PASS ??

many thks for your help.
Vincent
-
ATTENTION:
The information in this electronic mail message is private and
confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you
receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this
message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by
reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
opening it.

Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.
If this message contains password-protected attachments, the
files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.
Always scan attachments before opening them.
-




Re: [squid-users] squid caching report

2009-01-16 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
Hi ALL

Here is HOW to - Step by Step. I use this on Redhat/CentOS

SARG - Step by Step -


Fisst install rpmforge-release RPM .

Then, perform below steps


[r...@worldnet ~]# yum install sarg
[r...@worldnet ~]# cd /etc/httpd/conf.d/
[r...@worldnet conf.d]# cp sarg.conf sarg.conf.orig
[r...@worldnet conf.d]# cat sarg.conf
Alias /sarg /var/www/sarg

Directory /var/www/sarg
  DirectoryIndex index.html
  Order deny,allow
  Deny from all
  Allow from all
/Directory

[r...@worldnet conf.d]# /etc/init.d/httpd restart

Then,
[r...@worldnet ~]# cd /var/www/sarg/


Now, Edit words ONE-SHOT and One shot reports of index.html to reports
and reports (Every 30 minutes) as follows.

tda href=web-reports/index.htmlweb-reports/a/td
  tdweb-reports/td


Then,
[r...@worldnet sarg]# cd /etc/sarg/
[r...@worldnet sarg]# cp sarg.conf sarg.conf.orig
And edit, sarg.conf

Pls coment out below line as follows,
#output_dir /var/www/sarg/ONE-SHOT

and, Add below line.
output_dir /var/www/sarg/web-reports

Then, issue below command,
[r...@worldnet sarg]# /usr/bin/sarg
SARG: Records in file: 1514, reading: 100.00%

Then, touch
[r...@worldnet ~]# touch /var/www/sarg/sarg.cron

[r...@worldnet sarg]# cat /var/www/sarg/sarg.cron
#!/bin/bash
cd /var/www/sarg/web-reports
rm -rf *
/usr/bin/sarg

[r...@wolrdnet sarg]# chmod 755 /var/www/sarg/sarg.cron


Then,
[r...@worldnet ~]# cd /etc/cron.d
[r...@worldnet cron.d]# touch sarg
[r...@worldnet ~]# cat /etc/cron.d/sarg
0 15 * * * root /var/www/sarg/sarg.cron  /dev/null 21

Then, issue below commands.
[r...@worldnet ~]# /etc/cron.daily/sarg
[r...@worldnet ~]# /etc/cron.weekly/sarg
[r...@worldnet ~]# /etc/cron.monthly/sarg


Now, Browse as follows.
http://192.168.101.25/sarg

That's it.



On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Andreev Nikita n...@kemsu.ru wrote:
 Hi.

 You can use cacti but it's MRTG-like. The best tools I know for squid
 reports are sarg (which is rather popular) and lightsquid (it makes
 reports a lot faster but I don't know if it's popular outside Russia).

 Regards,
 LPIC-1, EMCPA
 Nikita Andreev





-- 
Thank you
Indunil Jayasooriya


Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.6 STABLE 6 : SubDirectory trailing slash

2009-01-16 Thread Kinkie
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:08 AM, François-Xavier VIOLET
fxvio...@ciril.net wrote:
 Hi, all,

 I'm trying squid as a reverse proxy for a web application.

 I have a problem when my URL is not ending with a trailing slash.

 For example :

 http://ip-proxy/test/ = OK
 http://ip-proxy/test = KO, Problem

Can you be a bit more specific about what is the problem? What error
do you get? Without knowing it, it's hard to suggest a fix..

-- 
/kinkie


Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7 Chained Proxies and NTLM Pass-thru

2009-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries

vincent.blon...@ing.be wrote:

hello all,

my clients should access an IIS website requesting ntlm authentication
'WWW-Authentication'. they all use ie6 and proxied through a chain of
two proxies.

the first one hosted in internal network making the whole job of
logging, validating ntlm authentication coming from all the ie's with
our internal active directories, allow/deny websites mime-types and all
kind of stuffs.

the other one hosted in dmz as making simply the job of gateway to the
internet.

Both of them are running 2.7.4

simple question .. Is that possible or not to make this surfing working
.. if yes what do I have to configure ??
Do I have to activate things like squid ntlm_auth binary,
connection-auth=on, login=PASS ??


Only connection-auth=on. Not login=PASS.
auth_* should not be needed unless Proxy-Authentication is required.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE11
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3


[squid-users] unexpected http status code

2009-01-16 Thread wh

Hello.

I would like to know what does these errors mean:

2009/01/15 20:44:39| ctx: enter level  0:
'http://prev.explabs.net/sspost3.aspx'
2009/01/15 20:44:39| http.cc(561) HttpStateData::cacheableReply:
unexpected http status code 100
2009/01/15 21:04:42| ctx: exit level  0
2009/01/15 21:04:42| ctx: enter level  0:
'http://prev.explabs.net/sspost3.aspx'
2009/01/15 21:04:42| http.cc(561) HttpStateData::cacheableReply:
unexpected http status code 100
2009/01/15 21:24:39| ctx: exit level  0
2009/01/15 21:24:39| ctx: enter level  0:
'http://prev.explabs.net/sspost3.aspx'
2009/01/15 21:24:39| http.cc(561) HttpStateData::cacheableReply:
unexpected http status code 100
2009/01/15 21:44:40| ctx: exit level  0
2009/01/15 21:44:40| ctx: enter level  0:
'http://prev.explabs.net/sspost3.aspx'
2009/01/15 21:44:40| http.cc(561) HttpStateData::cacheableReply:
unexpected http status code 100

Thanks in advanced for your help.



[squid-users] Squid and Google Sorry Message

2009-01-16 Thread jeff donovan

Greetings

I am running two squid boxes as content filters for a number of  
schools. Google has recently changed and we are now getting a  Sorry  
you look like a botnet 

We're sorry...
... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer  
virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't  process  
your request right now.
We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon.  
In the meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been  
infected, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to  
make sure that your systems are free of viruses and other spurious  
software.


from what I can tell. too many searches from one IP address.
I have been running this way for years.

is there anything I can do to have squid give out more than one ip  
address? or is there some tweek that I can perform to make this error  
go away?



thanks

-jeff


[squid-users] Fwd: Problem in WCCP configuration

2009-01-16 Thread viveksnv


Amos, Henrik

I need your help. I am a newbie in squid + tproxy + WCCP. So I sent lot 
messages to you.


Now i describe my problem. I have a router with 2 Ethernet, 6 Serial 
interfaces. LAN users connected via Ethernet 0/0 and squid machine 
connected via Ethernet 0/1 interface. And internet connected all the 4 
interfaces. I had created the tunneling interface using router 
identifier address. Router detects the two wccp services. But my 
problem is..


Squid works transparent perfectly.  rule- ip wccp web-cache redirect in 
-- Ethernet 0/0 -LAN interface.


But I tried Tproxy, it doesn't works. ip wccp 80 redirect in , ip wccp 
90 redirect out -- Ethernet 0/0 - LAN interface.


And i tried all the options based on 
--http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/FullyTransparentWithTPROXY.


But no luck.

I checked in webserver. Client reaches it. Squid returns connection 
timeout error.



Router IOS version is

Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version
12.4(13b), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3). Any bug in this IOS version.


Global WCCP information:

  Router information:

  Router Identifier:   xx.xx.xx.xx

  Protocol Version:2.0


  Service Identifier: 80

  Number of Service Group Clients: 1

  Number of Service Group Routers: 1

  Total Packets s/w Redirected:1146

Process:   0

Fast:  0

CEF:   1146

  Redirect access-list:15

  Total Packets Denied Redirect:   2814525

  Total Packets Unassigned:15328

  Group access-list:   -none-

  Total Messages Denied to Group:  0

  Total Authentication failures:   0

  Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0


  Service Identifier: 90

  Number of Service Group Clients: 1

  Number of Service Group Routers: 1

  Total Packets s/w Redirected:0

Process:   0

Fast:  0

CEF:   0

  Redirect access-list:15

  Total Packets Denied Redirect:   3143419

  Total Packets Unassigned:17297

  Group access-list:   -none-

  Total Messages Denied to Group:  0

  Total Authentication failures:   0

  Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0


Squid configuration :


wccp2_service dynamic 80

wccp2_service_info 80 protocol=tcp flags=src_ip_hash priority=240
ports=80

wccp2_service dynamic 90

wccp2_service_info 90 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_source
priority=240 ports=80


But it works good in transparent mode.


Thanks in advance.


Thanks

Vk.

You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.in



Re: [squid-users] Vary: * handling in Squid

2009-01-16 Thread howard chen
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
 howard chen wrote:

 Hello,

 (1) Is that Vary: * exact header, or Vary: with some header names?


Exactly Vary: *


 (2) do the pages have Cache-Control: must-revalidate ?
  or does squid.conf have a short refresh_pattern age with override-expires
 that matches you pages.


The header was sent-out by Apache 1.3x mod_gzip, the page is supposed
to be cached (standard JS and CSS files)

no custom refresh_pattern being set.


Thanks.


Re: [squid-users] Squid and Google Sorry Message

2009-01-16 Thread Mark Barlow
MALWARE ALERT!
I had this, my PC was infected by a drive by download from an innocent site.

2009/1/16 jeff donovan dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
 Greetings

 I am running two squid boxes as content filters for a number of schools.
 Google has recently changed and we are now getting a  Sorry you look like a
 botnet 
 We're sorry...
 ... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus
 or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't  process your request
 right now.
 We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the
 meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been infected,
 you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that
 your systems are free of viruses and other spurious software.

 from what I can tell. too many searches from one IP address.
 I have been running this way for years.

 is there anything I can do to have squid give out more than one ip address?
 or is there some tweek that I can perform to make this error go away?


 thanks

 -jeff



Re: [squid-users] Squid and Google Sorry Message

2009-01-16 Thread Mark Barlow
Some additional thoughts.

From memory, when my PC was infected it was bypassing squid and going
direct. (My PC was allowed through the firewall for testing)  The
malware was looking for other sites to infect using Google.  As google
are already blocking your access I would start looking at your
firewall.  Log all requests to port 80 and look for the PC/s that are
trying to access google constantly.  This showed up pretty quick when
I was infected. I chose to rebuild my PC.

Hope this helps.

2009/1/16 Mark Barlow squid.users.mailing.l...@googlemail.com:
 MALWARE ALERT!
 I had this, my PC was infected by a drive by download from an innocent site.

 2009/1/16 jeff donovan dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
 Greetings

 I am running two squid boxes as content filters for a number of schools.
 Google has recently changed and we are now getting a  Sorry you look like a
 botnet 
 We're sorry...
 ... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus
 or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't  process your request
 right now.
 We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the
 meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been infected,
 you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that
 your systems are free of viruses and other spurious software.

 from what I can tell. too many searches from one IP address.
 I have been running this way for years.

 is there anything I can do to have squid give out more than one ip address?
 or is there some tweek that I can perform to make this error go away?


 thanks

 -jeff




Re: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..

2009-01-16 Thread Roland Roland

hello :)
I've took a break of working live on squid and started reading more about it 
to see what I'm getting myself into..
I managed to get the router and squid to see each other and troubleshoot the 
GRE tunnel..
sh ip wccp shows hits.. but when I check the access.log and cache.log of 
squid I  see nothing..

any idea what might be causing this?
heres the output of router debug:


6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0023
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0028
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 002A
6 17:12:22.968: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from 
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.968: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/ 
rcv_id 002A




CME-Router#sh ip wccp
Global WCCP information:
   Router information:
   Router Identifier:   172.16.50.54
   Protocol Version:2.0

   Service Identifier: web-cache
   Number of Service Group Clients: 0
   Number of Service Group Routers: 0
   Total Packets s/w Redirected:0
 Process:   0
 Fast:  0
 CEF:   0
   Redirect access-list:198
   Total Packets Denied Redirect:   0
   Total Packets Unassigned:0
   Group access-list:   -none-
   Total Messages Denied to Group:  0
   Total Authentication failures:   0
   Total Bypassed Packets Received: 0

   Service Identifier: 80
  

RE: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..

2009-01-16 Thread Ritter, Nicholas
The firewall on the squid box might be blocking the traffic, either the GRE 
traffic itself, or some other facet. Start by allowing all traffic in to the 
box on the eth interface and the gre interface from both the IP from the router 
identifier field, and the IP of the ethernet interface of the router that 
egresses to the squid box. For example, if 172.16.50.54 is the loopback 
interface on the router, and 192.168.10.1 is the FastEthernet0/0 interface of 
the router, and the squid box hangs off of FastEthernet0/0, then put those two 
IPs in as allows. If you use subinterfaces with IPs, use the subinterface.
 
Testing I have done has shown that depending on the configuration and IOS of 
the router, the router will use different IPs to talk to the squid box.
 
If doing this fixes your problem, you can then narrow down the firewall rules 
to be more specific, and therefore more secure.
 
Nick



From: Roland Roland [mailto:r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Fri 1/16/2009 8:27 PM
To: Ritter, Nicholas; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..



hello :)
I've took a break of working live on squid and started reading more about it
to see what I'm getting myself into..
I managed to get the router and squid to see each other and troubleshoot the
GRE tunnel..
sh ip wccp shows hits.. but when I check the access.log and cache.log of
squid I  see nothing..
any idea what might be causing this?
heres the output of router debug:


6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0023
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0028
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: 

[squid-users] SNMP OIDs

2009-01-16 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Hi,

We are trying to get rid fo a commercial reverse proxy, how ever, we must get 
this data from SNMP.  I know that squid has snmp support, I've used, but I 
dont know all oids.  Does any one has a link where oids are specified?

Regards,




RE: [squid-users] squid caching report

2009-01-16 Thread Gregori Parker
If you have snmp enabled, I would highly recommend setting up an instance of 
cacti (http://www.cacti.net/)

If you have trouble understanding the Cacti installation, I would recommend 
getting started with CactiEZ...it's an ISO that gets you up and going fast.
CactiEZ Download: http://mirror.cactiusers.org/downloads/CactiEZ-v0.4.tar.gz 
CactiEZ Documentation: http://cactiusers.org/wiki/CactiEZ 

Cacti templates for Squid: http://forums.cacti.net/about4142.html

I have Cacti doing all my reporting on Squid, and it's beautiful (and the execs 
love it, which doesn’t hurt...I can send you graph examples if you like)

- Gregori


-Original Message-
From: bijayant kumar [mailto:bijayan...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:48 PM
To: squid users
Subject: [squid-users] squid caching report

Hello list,

I want to have reports about the squid performance like how much caching is 
being done by Squid, how much bandwidth is being saved by the squid cache by 
returning objects from cache. I thought of cache manager output but my seniors 
want to see reports in a less complex format something like graph based 
reports. I have configured the MRTG graph also for the squid but most of the 
stuff I am not able to understand. 
Is anything available on the Internet so that I can create some graphs/reports 
about the Squid performance? Any pointer will be highly useful for me.

Bijayant Kumar


  Get your preferred Email name!
Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com. 
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/


RE: [squid-users] OWA accelerator authentication weirdness

2009-01-16 Thread Alan Lehman
 Yes. Multiple authentication methods, triggered from multiple sources,

 going via multiple paths can be confusing.
 
 Squid auth_param elided, which leaves:
 
 A user name and password are being requested by ...
 == basic challenge by ISA.
 
 Enter user name and password for ...
 == integrated/NTLM challenge by ISA.
 
 
 I'm now thinking we have two distinct configurations for Squid:
 
 Basic Auth (only) passed back
   cache_peer ... login=PASS connection-auth=off
 
 NTLM Auth (only) passed back:
   cache_peer ... connection-auth=on
 
 
 Which appear to be non-compatible auth methods at present.
 What happens if you re-enable the connection-auth on https_port and 
 remove the login=PASS from cache_peer?
 
 Amos
 

OWA is back to the previous double login with Firefox. Activesync PDA
won't accept login.


[squid-users] request for help

2009-01-16 Thread Wennie V. Lagmay
I installed squid-3.0 STABLE11 and at first it is working smooth, but after 1 
day the proxy is working very very slow and dying, I am getting an error 
similar below. Can anybody help me on my problem please.


2009/01/16 22:42:47| WARNING: HTTP header contains NULL characters {Accept: */*
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded}
2009/01/16 22:42:50| tunnelReadServer: FD 3918: read failure: (0) Success
2009/01/16 22:42:51| tunnelReadServer: FD 3767: read failure: (0) Success


Thanks in advance,

Wennie


RE: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..

2009-01-16 Thread Nick Duda
Wouldn't having a web-cache and another identifier 80 cause issues? Web-cache 
is port 80.

What does your wccp2_service directive say, 80 or 0? W
What does your wccp ACL look like on your router/asa?
What does your wccp2_forwarding and wccp2_return method state? (this is your 
communication over gre)
Can your router/asa ping the GRE IP on your squid box?

Your squid box is setting up the wccp via its normal IP, but is probably 
configured to communicate on the GRE tunnel. My guess is something is not 
configured properly there.

- Nick



-Original Message-
From: Roland Roland [mailto:r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:27 PM
To: Ritter, Nicholas; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..

hello :)
I've took a break of working live on squid and started reading more about it
to see what I'm getting myself into..
I managed to get the router and squid to see each other and troubleshoot the
GRE tunnel..
sh ip wccp shows hits.. but when I check the access.log and cache.log of
squid I  see nothing..
any idea what might be causing this?
heres the output of router debug:


6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.012: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0020
6 17:10:14.016: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.504: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0021
6 17:10:31.508: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0023
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0022
6 17:10:48.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0023
6 17:11:03.656: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.056: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0024
6 17:11:17.060: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.060: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0025
6 17:11:28.064: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0026
6 17:11:42.904: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.640: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0028
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0027
6 17:11:56.644: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0028
6 17:12:11.392: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.960: WCCP-PKT:D90: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 002A
6 17:12:22.968: WCCP-PKT:D80: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
192.168.0.2 w/rcv_id 0029
6 17:12:22.968: WCCP-PKT:D80: Sending I_See_You packet to 192.168.0.2 w/
rcv_id 002A



CME-Router#sh ip wccp
Global WCCP information:
Router information:
Router Identifier:   

Re: [squid-users] oot: about sarg

2009-01-16 Thread Chris Robertson

░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ ▓▒░ wrote:

i use crontab
*/30 * * * *  /usr/bin/sarg -f /etc/squid/sarg.conf

but the sarg always display 2 lines
16Jan2009-16Jan2009 Fri Jan 16 07:30:01 EST 20097   82.28M  11.75M
15Jan2009-16Jan2009 Fri Jan 16 06:30:12 EST 200998  3.44G   35.13M
15Jan2009-15Jan2009 Fri Jan 16 00:00:12 EST 200998  3.44G   35.12M
  


This looks like you have three SARG processes running. One started at 
midnight, one at 06:30 and one at 07:30.


1) How large is your access.log?
2) How often do you rotate it?

You are not specifying that SARG only process data for the current day, 
so it's working on the whole data set every time it runs.



how to fix it ?
the point 15Jan2009-16Jan2009 is similar with 15Jan2009-15Jan2009

i want to set my report
everyday with update every 30 min...
  



I run SARG on an hourly basis at a lot of my client's sites, so I tell 
it to only process the current day's reports, with a script in 
/etc/cron.hourly that looks like...


#!/bin/bash

#Get current date
TODAY=$(date +%d/%m/%Y)
/usr/bin/sarg -d $TODAY-$TODAY
exit $?

# End Script

Chris



Re: [squid-users] Problems with squidclient

2009-01-16 Thread Chris Robertson

Andreev Nikita wrote:

Hi.

I'm trying to get basic squid info by issuing 'squidclient -p 8080
mgr:info'. Port 8080 is where our squid is listening to connections.
All clients works fine through the squid. But squidclient return http
response (lets say mydomain.com is my domain):


ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved

While trying to retrieve the URL:
cache_object://localhost.mydomain.com/info

The following error was encountered:
Access Denied.

Access control configuration prevents your request from
being allowed at this time.  Please contact your service provider if
you feel this is incorrect.

Your cache administrator is r...@mydomain.com.


Here are the squid access directives:

http_access allow manager localhost
http_access deny manager
http_access deny !Safe_ports
http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports
http_access deny pubrooms pubrooms_ext
http_access allow localhost
http_access allow our_networks
http_access deny all

Here is the debug info:

2009/01/16 11:00:35| The request GET cache_object://localhost/info is ALLOWED, 
because it matched 'localhost'
  


Here the http_request allow manager localhost matched, so the request 
was allowed.



2009/01/16 11:00:35| CACHEMGR: unknown@127.0.0.1 requesting 'info'

2009/01/16 11:00:35| The reply for GET
cache_object://localhost.mydomain.com/info is DENIED, because it matched 'all'
  


What do your reply_access lines look like?  The reply to this allowed 
request is denied.



2009/01/16 11:00:35| The reply for GET
cache_object://localhost.mydomain.com/info is ALLOWED, because it matched 'all'

This debug output is absolutely unclear for me. Why does the same link
hit the same acl with different results (deny and allow).


Because that ACL is used in more than one rule.


 Why are there two different links?


Squid test both the request and the reply against access rules.


 And finally. Why it doesn't work?
  


It did work.  Just as you configured it to.  ;o)  If computers did what 
we want instead of what we ask them to, I'd likely be out of a job...



Regards,
LPIC-1, EMCPA
Nikita Andreev


Chris


Re: [squid-users] squid caching report

2009-01-16 Thread Chris Robertson

bijayant kumar wrote:

Hello list,

I want to have reports about the squid performance like how much caching is being done by Squid, how much bandwidth is being saved by the squid cache by returning objects from cache. I thought of cache manager output but my seniors want to see reports in a less complex format something like graph based reports. I have configured the MRTG graph also for the squid but most of the stuff I am not able to understand. 
Is anything available on the Internet so that I can create some graphs/reports about the Squid performance? Any pointer will be highly useful for me.
  


http://www.squid-cache.org/Scripts/


Bijayant Kumar


Chris


RE: [squid-users] SNMP OIDs

2009-01-16 Thread Gregori Parker
Google is your friend, search for Squid+OID...the following were in the
top 10 results:
http://www.linofee.org/~jel/proxy/Squid/oid.shtml
http://www.oidview.com/mibs/3495/SQUID-MIB.html

Keep in mind that a lot of these OIDs will end in .1, .5 and .60 (for 1
min, 5 min and hourly averages)

e.g.
requestHitRatioOneMin .1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.3.2.2.1.9.1
requestHitRatioFiveMin .1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.3.2.2.1.9.5
requestHitRatioHourly .1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.3.2.2.1.9.60

You can also just snmpwalk the 1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1 tree



-Original Message-
From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:54 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] SNMP OIDs

Hi,

We are trying to get rid fo a commercial reverse proxy, how ever, we
must get 
this data from SNMP.  I know that squid has snmp support, I've used, but
I 
dont know all oids.  Does any one has a link where oids are specified?

Regards,




Re: [squid-users] Frequent cache rebuilding

2009-01-16 Thread Chris Robertson

Andreev Nikita wrote:

Hi.

What are the reasons of squid rebuilding it's cache? Sometimes after
startup sometimes during work it starts to rebuild cache. I see it in
cahce.log:
  


Squid rebuilds the swap.state file when a logrotate (and I think 
reconfigure) is called for.  Usually it's not a big deal.  My main cache 
has about 13 million objects and rebuilding the cache takes just over 10 
seconds:


2009/01/15 04:02:27| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
...
2009/01/15 04:02:39|   Finished.  Wrote 12918887 entries.
2009/01/15 04:02:39|   Took 12.4 seconds (1044380.1 entries/sec).

and

2009/01/16 04:02:29| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
...
2009/01/16 04:02:40|   Finished.  Wrote 12906114 entries.
2009/01/16 04:02:40|   Took 11.3 seconds (1138371.9 entries/sec).


2009/01/16 09:30:24| Starting Squid Cache version 2.6.STABLE6 for 
x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu...
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Process ID 2625
2009/01/16 09:30:24| With 1024 file descriptors available
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Using epoll for the IO loop
2009/01/16 09:30:24| DNS Socket created at 0.0.0.0, port 60302, FD 5
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Adding domain mydomain.com from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Adding nameserver 22.179.1.11 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Adding nameserver 22.179.1.15 from /etc/resolv.conf
2009/01/16 09:30:24| User-Agent logging is disabled.
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Referer logging is disabled.
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Unlinkd pipe opened on FD 10
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Swap maxSize 16777216 KB, estimated 1290555 objects
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Target number of buckets: 64527
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Using 65536 Store buckets
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Max Mem  size: 393216 KB
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Max Swap size: 16777216 KB
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Local cache digest enabled; rebuild/rewrite every 
3600/3600 sec
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Store logging disabled
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Rebuilding storage in /var/spool/squid (CLEAN)
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Using Least Load store dir selection
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Set Current Directory to /var/spool/squid
2009/01/16 09:30:24| Loaded Icons.
2009/01/16 09:30:26| Accepting proxy HTTP connections at 0.0.0.0, port 8080, FD 
11.
2009/01/16 09:30:26| Accepting ICP messages at 0.0.0.0, port 3130, FD 12.
2009/01/16 09:30:26| WCCP Disabled.
2009/01/16 09:30:26| Ready to serve requests.
2009/01/16 09:30:35| Store rebuilding is  0.4% complete
2009/01/16 09:30:53| Store rebuilding is  1.1% complete
2009/01/16 09:31:08| Store rebuilding is  1.5% complete
2009/01/16 09:31:24| Store rebuilding is  2.3% complete
2009/01/16 09:31:44| Store rebuilding is  3.1% complete
2009/01/16 09:32:01| Store rebuilding is  3.4% complete
...
2009/01/16 10:32:41| Store rebuilding is 98.1% complete
2009/01/16 10:33:06| Store rebuilding is 98.5% complete
2009/01/16 10:33:26| Store rebuilding is 98.9% complete
2009/01/16 10:33:53| Store rebuilding is 99.6% complete
2009/01/16 10:34:13| Done reading /var/spool/squid swaplog (1072895 entries)
2009/01/16 10:34:13| Finished rebuilding storage from disk.
2009/01/16 10:34:13|   1072895 Entries scanned
2009/01/16 10:34:13| 0 Invalid entries.
2009/01/16 10:34:13| 0 With invalid flags.
2009/01/16 10:34:13|   1044791 Objects loaded.
2009/01/16 10:34:13| 0 Objects expired.
2009/01/16 10:34:13| 0 Objects cancelled.
2009/01/16 10:34:13|  7253 Duplicate URLs purged.
2009/01/16 10:34:13| 20851 Swapfile clashes avoided.
2009/01/16 10:34:13|   Took 3829.6 seconds ( 272.8 objects/sec).
  


Yikes.  That's slow...


2009/01/16 10:34:13| Beginning Validation Procedure
2009/01/16 10:35:04|262144 Entries Validated so far.
2009/01/16 10:35:17|524288 Entries Validated so far.
2009/01/16 10:35:25|786432 Entries Validated so far.
2009/01/16 10:35:43|   Completed Validation Procedure
2009/01/16 10:35:43|   Validated 1044747 Entries
2009/01/16 10:35:43|   store_swap_size = 15131260k
2009/01/16 10:37:58| storeLateRelease: released 4184 objects

I never stop squid abnormally and I never restart server abnormally.
So I don't understand why does squid do it. It takes a lot of CPU
resources and about an hour of time.


What kind of CPU resources?  Userspace, system, or wait?

 It never happened before. But now 
it happens several times a day.


Could somebody help whith that?

P.S. I have 18G partition with 16G granted for squid cache and 2G free
for temporary squid files. So I hope it's enough space for squid to
perform it's everyday tasks.
  


Ah.  A lot of  file systems start to perform poorly as they approach 
capacity.  I'd suggest setting your cache_dir to 13G and let squid clear 
out the excess or grow the partition to 30G (if you have the space).



Regards,
LPIC-1, EMCPA
Nikita Andreev
  


Chris



Re: [squid-users] SNMP OIDs

2009-01-16 Thread Chris Robertson

Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:

Hi,

We are trying to get rid fo a commercial reverse proxy, how ever, we must get 
this data from SNMP.  I know that squid has snmp support, I've used, but I 
dont know all oids.  Does any one has a link where oids are specified?


Regards,
  


There is a MIB included in the source.  Also, 
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidSnmp


Chris


Re: [squid-users] Squid and Google Sorry Message

2009-01-16 Thread Tim Bates

Mark Barlow wrote:

Log all requests to port 80 and look for the PC/s that are
trying to access google constantly.
Especially at times when it's normally a lower load. At the school I 
work for, lunchtime is pretty slow as pretty much everyone is off the 
computers... And nights are obvious too (if you leave the computers on 
that is).


Alternatively, it could be something like X-Forwarded-For is off (not 
sure if Google check that, but enabling it if it's off might help).


TB


[squid-users] ADSL -- Linux -- Hub -- Windows .................. Slow response

2009-01-16 Thread Mr Crack
I have installed RHEL 5.1 and have the following result with the
following configurations.

Conf-A.  ADSL Modem---Windows // It offers fast response
when connecting any website
Conf-B.  ADSL Modem -- Linux-- Hub---Windows Client ... // Slow
response compared to Conf-A    when connecting any website
Conf-C.  ADSL Modem -- Router -- Linux --- Hub -- Windows Client
.. // Fast response and same as Conf-A.

Note:
1. All above configuration are test without squid (i.e with NAT only mode )
2. Selinux -- Permissive mode

Conf-A  Conf-C response time are fast and i think same...

Here is my questions... !!
Why it becomes slow response time with Conf-B style configurations... ?
If any one of you suspect, pls test by yourself.
I think ... we need to makes some tweaks... in Linux box...
But I dont know ...
May be MTU...Selinux.or sth else...

I believe any one can point out me how to fix Conf-B to get fast response.

Mr.Crack007