Re: [squid-users] some pages not load
try check the cache ability for this site: http://www.ircache.net/cgi-bin/cacheability.py --- On Sun, 5/4/09, Luis Casalini wrote: > From: Luis Casalini > Subject: [squid-users] some pages not load > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Received: Sunday, 5 April, 2009, 6:12 AM > Hello > We have problems for example with this url > > http://www.fullaventura.com/ > > Can any help please > > Thankyou > > Yahoo!7 recommends that you update your browser to the new Internet Explorer 8.Get it now.
Re: [squid-users] Error File size limit exceeded
--- On Sun, 5/4/09, Wong wrote: > From: Wong > Subject: [squid-users] Error File size limit exceeded > To: "Squid-users" > Received: Sunday, 5 April, 2009, 11:47 AM > Dear All, > > I found error message below and squid unable to run. > > --snip-- > > [r...@squid root]# squid -NCDd1 > File size limit exceeded > maybe logfile is too large. are you running a 32bit squid? Enjoy a safer web experience. Upgrade to the new Internet Explorer 8 optimised for Yahoo!7. Get it now.
[squid-users] Error File size limit exceeded
Dear All, I found error message below and squid unable to run. --snip-- [r...@squid root]# squid -NCDd1 File size limit exceeded --snip-- Would you tell me what cause such problem? Thx & Rgds, Wong
[squid-users] Not Anonymous ?
Hi there, I wasn't able to find any information on a non anoymous proxy server... I'm running one squid server for many people located in different places/countries and I'm running into several issues. For example: Their language is not well recognized on some websites because of their hidden Ip address, and some minor stuff based on the IP address... So that's why I would like to know if there is a way to setup squid as a proxy, but not an anonymous one ... Thank you all for your answer. Julien
[squid-users] "concurrency" attribute external_acl_type
List, 1) for the "concurrency" attribute does this simply indicate how many items in a batch will be sent to the external helper? 1.1) assuming concurrency is set to "6" for example, and let's assume a user's browser session sends out "7" actual URL's through the proxy request - does this mean "6" will go to the first instance of the external helper, and the "7th" will go to a second instance of the helper? 1.1.1) Assuming the 6 from the first part of the batch return "OK" and the 7th returns "ERR", will the user's browser session, render the 6 and not render the 7th? More importantly, how does Squid know that the two batches - one of 6, and one with 1, for the 7 total, know that all 7 came from the same browser session? What I have currently: - openldap with postgresql, used for my "user database", which permits me to use the "auth_param squid_ldap_auth" module to authenticate my users with. - a postgresql database storing my acl's for the given user database Process: Step1: user authenticates through squid_ldap_auth Step2: the user requested URL(and obviously all images, content, ...) get passed to the external helper Step3: external helper checks those URL's against the database for the specific user and then determines "OK" or "ERR" Issue1: How to have the user requested URL(and all images, content, ...) get passed as a batch/bundle, to a single external helper instance, so I can collectively determine "OK" or "ERR" Any ideas? Is the "concurrency" attribute to declare a maximum number of "requests" that go to a single external helper instance? So if I set concurrency to 15, should I have the external helper read count++ while STDIN lines come in, until no more, then I know I have X number in a batch/bundle? Obviously there is no way to predetermine how many URL's/URI's will need to be checked against the database, so if I set concurrency to 1024, "presuming to be high enough" that no single request will max it out, then I can just count++ and when the external helper is done counting STDIN readlines, I can process to determine "OK" or "ERR" for that specific request? Issue2: I'd like to just have a single external helper instance start up, that can fork() and deal with each URL/URI request, however, I'm not sure Squid in its current incarnation passes enough information OR doesn't permit specific enough passback (from the helper) information, to make this happen. Any deeper insights, would be tremendously appreciated. Thanks, -- Louis Gonzales BSCS EMU 2003 HP Certified Professional louis.gonza...@linuxlouis.net
[squid-users] some pages not load
Hello We have problems for example with this url http://www.fullaventura.com/ Can any help please Thankyou
[squid-users] Memory-only Squid questions
Hi all, I've got a 64-bit Reverse-proxy squid running on Ubuntu as of yesterday (3.0Stable13). I've got it configured how I want it as far as I can tell. I've compiled the cache_dir null type in, and configured it as "cache_dir null /tmp", as I do not want to cache to disk on this machine at all. I want all the data to be cached in memory, but all I'm seeing in my access.log is TCP_IMS_HIT & TCP_MISS. No TCP_MEM_HIT for anything. Now, I know TCP_IMS_HIT is ambiguous and can indicate IMS_HIT from memory or disk, but in this case where I am "cache_dir null /tmp", are these IMS_HIT coming from memory, or am I misunderstanding the 'null' type? Also, the items that are recieving TCP_MISS are items that should be in MEM_HIT all the time, as they are loaded with EVERY page load (static menu, page structure images, etc). This concerns me, as in a ufs or aufs cache_dir, these items hit from memory Also, in store.log, I'm only seeing RELEASE & SO_FAIL. I do see memory usage increasing when watching "top", which is good. I'm just curious if these indicators in the logs are something to be concerned about in this type of config. NOTEABLE CONFIG OPTIONS: cache_mem 28672 MB maximum_object_size_in_memory 150 KB -- My objects are between 2KB - 20KB (so, 150 is a limit that likely should never be reached) memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF cache_dir null /tmp Is this the best way to go about a memory only cache? I've seen a few posts re: using RAM disks for cache_dir instead... Thanks All, David __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
Re: [squid-users] advice
so not to add more to my email, I'm seeking advice about the proper way to learn about squid from A to Z if possible... Use it. squid is not that hard to setup if you do not have requirements like authentication or reverse-proxying. your case sounds quite simple; so what does not work? BTW: the linux high availability thing is a quite complex piece of software. If I were you, I would not experiment with squid AND HA at the same time. j.curdes
Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ?
Riccardo Castellani wrote: so difference, as Yan said, essentially is GUI ? And about other Linux distribution ? Or Debian is nore suitable to ttat job ? Now I'm using Fedora 1 ! I use Debian for servers because it is stable. Yes, not all the packages are the latest. But it works, and works quite well. Fedora is a beta-distro; it's intended to be RedHat's bleeding edge testing ground. IMHO, not suitable for servers. Use RedHat if you want a stable distro version. --Yan - Original Message - From: "Yan Seiner" To: "Riccardo Castellani" Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 11:44 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ? On Fri, April 3, 2009 2:05 pm, Riccardo Castellani wrote: I don't understand. For text UI, debian and ubuntu are virtually the same. I'd go with debian as most of the really nice stuff in ubuntu is around the GUI. --Yan - Original Message - From: "Amos Jeffries" To: "Riccardo Castellani" Cc: Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:59 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ? Riccardo Castellani wrote: I have to install new Linux server, based on ONLY on text console (not X server, not kde, not gnome) to having squid as parent cache. Then I have to configure sendmail which relays messages to 3 perimetral mail servers. I'm thinking to install Debian or Ubuntu server but what do you suggest me ? Up to you. Ubuntu is a child OS built on top of Debian. From the console they are almost identical. I find the delay in package updates annoying in Ubuntu, particularly since they cop it from their own release freezes, and from the Debian freezes once a year. But I'm an unashamed neophyte. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6 -- Yan Seiner, PE Support my bid for the 4J School Board http://www.seiner.com !DSPAM:49d70036308067818312239! -- Yan Seiner Support my bid for the 4J School Board. Visit http://www.seiner.com/schoolboard
[squid-users] advice
Hi all, a few weeks ago I got the task of setting up squid for my company. I had a network of 94 employee to set this up for ... I never heard of squid before to b honest, so after researching a bit.. I decided to setup Squid on centos server with wccp /cisco router 2811 though that didn't work out as my cisco ios had a bug tht prevented using wccp with it.. so I went at setting up two squid servers as our network's gateway with heartbeart failover solution.. with cisco 2811 in the background facing the internet. though that caused a prob for employees connecting through cisco vpn client, as they had to change their browser settings manually each time. I admit I went at this the wrong way.. as I mentioned I never heard of squid before so instead of reading about it I plunged straight into it.. so now It's time to learn about squid the right way as I had lots of help setting it up from this mailing list.. so not to add more to my email, I'm seeking advice about the proper way to learn about squid from A to Z if possible... any advice would be appreciated thanks in advance, Roland
Re: [squid-users] Squid : better on Debian or Ubunto server ?
Hi there On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Amos Jeffries wrote: The big difference between Debian and Ubuntu is the X server/kde/gnome GUI interface. Once you eliminate that you may as well flip a coin to choose. You can choose the desktop / window manager. Ubuntu Gnome Kubuntu KDE Xubuntu Xfce AFAIK Ubuntu is a mix of Debian Testing, Unstable and Experimental with a few added non Debian packages. On Debian you can do something similar by installing testing during freeze and then create a few backports from unstable and experimental. Debian Stable / Lenny provides Squid 2.7 and 3.0 (section web). If you want 3.1 you have to compile it yourself; Install gcc and libldap2-dev, libpam0g-dev, libdb-dev, sharutils, dpatch (>= 2.0.9), cdbs, libsasl2-dev, debhelper (>=5), libcppunit-dev. And download the source of course; http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/ The file http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/squid3/squid3_3.0.STABLE8.orig.tar.gz lists the differences between the Debian and the original version of Squid 3.0. It's mainly added copyright notices and a change in the install procedure. I didn't apply the patch (which is for 3.0), but used configure options instead. I could' get all the configure options to work though. Nor did I succeed in telling it not to install libexec in /usr/local/squid/libexec/ It also links libdl instead of librt. I don't know why. It does work though. Regards, Rob
