Re: [squid-users] Re: kerberos authentication with load balancers

2014-07-28 Thread Giorgi Tepnadze
Hello Markus

Thank you very much, everything works now. Only two question left
1) Is it necessary to run commands specified below every 30 day?

msktutil --auto-update --verbose --computer-name proxy1-k
msktutil --auto-update --verbose --computer-name proxy2-k
msktutil --auto-update --verbose --computer-name proxy-k

As I understand I should run them on one proxy1 and then copy updated
keytab file to proxy2 every month.

2) Can I use kerberos somehow to authenticate skype? All internet
browsers work but skype doesn't, only works by specifying user/pass in
configuration and as I think it uses basic ldap auth.
When there was NTLM auth, it worked, but now I removed all NTLM from
squid, only kerberos negotiate and basic is left.

George

On 26/07/14 15:55, Markus Moeller wrote:
> Hi Giorgi,
>
>   It would be
>
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy1.domain.com -h
> proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY1-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy1.domain.com--server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
>
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy2.domain.com -h
> proxy2.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY2-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy2.domain.com --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
>
> and one for DNS RR record
>
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy.mia.gov.ge -h
> proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
>
> The -h value is not really used.  So for the DNS RR you can use either
> name.
>
> Regards
> Markus
>
>
> "Giorgi Tepnadze"  wrote in message news:53d219ea.1010...@mia.gov.ge...
>
> Hi Markus
>
> Excuse me for posting in old list, but I have a small question:
>
> So I have 2 squid servers (proxy1.domain.com and proxy2.domain.com) and
> one DNS RR record (proxy.mia.gov.ge). Regarding your recommendation how
> should I create keytab file.
>
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy1.domain.com -h
> proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY1-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy1.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy2.domain.com -h
> proxy2.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY2-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy2.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
>
> and one for DNS RR record
>
> msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy.domain.com -h
> proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY2-K
> --upn HTTP/proxy.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
> --enctypes 28
>
> But there is problem with last one, which server name should I put in
> -s, -h, --upn and --computer-name?
>
> Many Thanks
>
> George
>
>
>
> On 07/02/14 01:26, Markus Moeller wrote:
>> Hi Joseph,
>>
>>   it is all possible :-)
>>
>>   Firstly I suggest not to use samba tools to create the squid keytab,
>> but use msktutil (see
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/Kerberos).
>> Then create a keytab for the loadbalancer name ( that is the one
>> configured in IE or Firefox). use this keytab on both proxy servers
>> and use negotiate_kerberos_auth with  -s GSS_C_NO_NAME
>>
>>  When you say multiple realms, do you have trust between the AD
>> domains or are they separate ?   If the domains do not have trust do
>> you intend to use the same loadbalancer name for the users of both
>> domains ?
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
>>
>> "Joseph Spadavecchia"  wrote in message
>> news:2b43c569f8254a4e82c948ce4c247ed5158...@blx-ex01.alba.local...
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> What is the recommended way to configure Kerberos authentication
>> behind two load balancers?
>>
>> AFAIK, based on the mailing lists, I should
>>
>> 1) Create a user account KrbUser on the AD server and add an SPN
>> HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com for the load balancer
>> 2) Join the domain with Kerberos and kinit
>> 3) net ads keytab add HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com@REALM -U KrbUser
>> 4) update squid.conf with an auth helper like negotiate_kerberos_auth
>> -s HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com@REALM
>>
>> Unfortunately, when I try this it fails.
>>
>> The only way I could get it to work at all was by removing the SPN
>> from the KrbUser and associating the SPN with the machine trust
>> account (of the proxy behind the loadbalancer)  However, this is not a
>> viable solution since there are two machines behind the load balancer
>> and AD only allows you to associate a SPN with one account.
>>
>> Furthermore, given that I needed step (4) above, is it possible to
>> have load balanced Kerberos authentication working with multiple
>> realms?  If so, then how?
>>
>> Many thanks.
>>
>
>



Re: [squid-users] Re: kerberos authentication with load balancers

2014-07-25 Thread Giorgi Tepnadze
Hi Markus

Excuse me for posting in old list, but I have a small question:

So I have 2 squid servers (proxy1.domain.com and proxy2.domain.com) and
one DNS RR record (proxy.mia.gov.ge). Regarding your recommendation how
should I create keytab file.

msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy1.domain.com -h
proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY1-K
--upn HTTP/proxy1.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
--enctypes 28
msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy2.domain.com -h
proxy2.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY2-K
--upn HTTP/proxy2.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
--enctypes 28

and one for DNS RR record

msktutil -c -b "CN=COMPUTERS" -s HTTP/proxy.domain.com -h
proxy1.domain.com -k /root/keytab/PROXY.keytab --computer-name PROXY2-K
--upn HTTP/proxy.mia.gov.ge --server addc03.domain.com --verbose
--enctypes 28

But there is problem with last one, which server name should I put in
-s, -h, --upn and --computer-name?

Many Thanks

George



On 07/02/14 01:26, Markus Moeller wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
>   it is all possible :-)
>
>   Firstly I suggest not to use samba tools to create the squid keytab,
> but use msktutil (see
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/Kerberos). 
> Then create a keytab for the loadbalancer name ( that is the one
> configured in IE or Firefox). use this keytab on both proxy servers
> and use negotiate_kerberos_auth with  -s GSS_C_NO_NAME
>
>  When you say multiple realms, do you have trust between the AD
> domains or are they separate ?   If the domains do not have trust do
> you intend to use the same loadbalancer name for the users of both
> domains ?
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> "Joseph Spadavecchia"  wrote in message
> news:2b43c569f8254a4e82c948ce4c247ed5158...@blx-ex01.alba.local...
>
> Hi there,
>
> What is the recommended way to configure Kerberos authentication
> behind two load balancers?
>
> AFAIK, based on the mailing lists, I should
>
> 1) Create a user account KrbUser on the AD server and add an SPN
> HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com for the load balancer
> 2) Join the domain with Kerberos and kinit
> 3) net ads keytab add HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com@REALM -U KrbUser
> 4) update squid.conf with an auth helper like negotiate_kerberos_auth
> -s HTTP/loadbalancer.example.com@REALM
>
> Unfortunately, when I try this it fails.
>
> The only way I could get it to work at all was by removing the SPN
> from the KrbUser and associating the SPN with the machine trust
> account (of the proxy behind the loadbalancer)  However, this is not a
> viable solution since there are two machines behind the load balancer
> and AD only allows you to associate a SPN with one account.
>
> Furthermore, given that I needed step (4) above, is it possible to
> have load balanced Kerberos authentication working with multiple
> realms?  If so, then how?
>
> Many thanks.
>



Re: [squid-users] Re: SMP vs Single Process Performance

2013-03-18 Thread Giorgi Tepnadze

On 18.03.2013 14:06, babajaga wrote:


So you might consider having multiple workers for rock-dir, but only one for
the larger stuff, stored using one single HUGE aufs.


Hello, Very interesting recommendations for me also. One question how to 
configure squid for situation described above by you?
Let me describe this situation as I see it, requests for big objects >32KB go 
to one worker with aufs and other requests with smaller objects go to another 
worker with rock.
So can squid select different workers by looking at HTTPContent-Lengthresponse 
header?