Re: [squid-users] How to Squid-Websense

2005-03-07 Thread Kelly_Connor




You have to log on to the websense website with your subscription key and
download the linux installer for websense.

Run the install.sh from the tarball on the squid box, but select custom
install, integration, integrate with squid cache server.

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 Corey Tyndall   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 M To
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 03/07/2005 09:07  n.at  
 AM cc
   squid-users@squid-cache.org   
   Subject
   Re: [squid-users] How to
   Squid-Websense  
   
   
   
   
   
   




does anyone know where to get the websense connector?  I can't seem to
find any info on the Wesense web site.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/02/05 08:33AM 
There is websense connector whcih should be installed in squid proxy
server, and in squid.conf should be defined redirector as helper
outside
of squid program which is in this case this connector.
regards,
Nikolay Nenchev



[EMAIL PROTECTED]@inet
02.03.2005 15:14

To
squid-users@squid-cache.org
cc

Subject
[squid-users] How to Squid-Websense






Hi everybody,

I'd like to integrate squid to websense. I have
installed squid in a RedHat 9 machine and websense in
Windows 2003 server.
I can't find any documentation that descripes the
integration steps. Do you know how may I do this.

Thanks a lot.






Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos

mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/




--

The contents of this e-mail (and any attachments) are confidential, may be
privileged and may contain copyright material. You may only reproduce or
distribute material if you are expressly authorized by us to do so. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this
email (and any attachments) is unauthorized. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender and immediately delete this
e-mail and any copies of it from your system.
==






Fw: [squid-users] How to Squid-Websense

2005-03-02 Thread Kelly_Connor






We are running Websense 5.5 on RH9 with all components, but we used to only
run the redirector to a Win2K Server.  If you just want squid to run the
redirector, you do the following:
Have squid running prior to all of this, without any user authentication at
this point.

Create a folder called /tmp/Websense551
Put your Websense551Setup_Lnx.tar.gz file in your /tmp/Websense551 and
un-tar it.
cd to /tmp/Websense551, run ./install.sh.

This is an installshield wizard, so it's pretty simple.  The install does
get redundant in its questions, sometimes.
You will be doing a custom installation.  You will choose to only do an
integration install, and install the Websense plugin for squid.

This should be option #4 during the custom install.
You will be prompted for the IP address of your policy server and filtering
server (the Win2K3 box), as well as the port.  Check your in-house
configurations and the Websense manual in pdf form for the Win2K3
installation.

The installshield will automatically update your squid.conf with the
redirector information.

Hope this helps, if not, let me know.  I know politics are often involved,
but if you can swing it, you should really run the whole thing on one box
if possible.  It is much cleaner, and can still be administrated via the
gui console from a windows client.

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:14:11PM +0100, sania maro wrote:

 I'd like to integrate squid to websense. I have
 installed squid in a RedHat 9 machine and websense in
 Windows 2003 server.
 I can't find any documentation that descripes the
 integration steps. Do you know how may I do this.


I have never separated websense like that - I have it all running on the
same solaris box with squid.  At a guess you need to install some of the
components onto the linux machine - I think the bits you need are the
policy server... or maybe just the integration needs to be installed.
I have installed websense a few times but I normally just put it all on
the squid box...

--
Brett Lymn



[squid-users] Compile squid with squid_ldap_auth and squid_ldap_group support

2005-01-20 Thread Kelly_Connor




What are the ./configure options I need to specify to compile squid to
support ldap operations?

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [squid-users] squid_ldap_group with users in several OUs

2004-12-02 Thread Kelly_Connor




Hi oliver-

Try adjusting your squid_ldap_group query just after -b
cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=local to include -s sub to search all
subcontainers.

Let me fire a question at you-

I am trying to use squid_ldap_group to query Novell eDirectory via LDAP for
multiple group memberships.

I am fuzzy on how the search filter is used, and I see in your filter that
you use variables other than %s that was referred to in some material I
read.

What is %g, and what is %u?  What is the difference between little f
and big F in your search filter?  I can find no documentation on big F.

I think this is the key I need to understand squid_ldap_group

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 Oliver Hookins
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ce.com.au To 
   squid-users 
 12/01/2004 08:46  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 PM cc 
   
   Subject 
   [squid-users] squid_ldap_group with 
   users in several OUs
   
   
   
   
   
   




OK this is my last question about this I swear... but I really need to
know the answer to this one.

I've just found out that where I'll be implementing the squid_ldap_group
authorisation has several OUs for containing the user accounts on the
2000 AD. At the moment my command line for the squid_ldap_group is as
follows:

external_acl_type ldap_group ttl=120 negative_ttl=120 %LOGIN
/usr/lib/squid/squid_ldap_group -b cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=local -f
((cn=%g)(member=%u)(objectClass=group)) -B
cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=local -F samaccountname=%s -D
cn=Oliver,cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=local -w password -S 192.168.150.100

This obviously just looks in the Users container for groups and users
and any subtrees. I tried shortening the Base DN for both users and
groups to just dc=domain,dc=local but it doesn't appear to work, I
suspect because of the filters or something. How can I specify a base DN
  and filter when the users may be in one of any number of OUs? (even
OUs nested within others)

Thanks in advance,
Oliver


---
Oliver Hookins
B.Sc(Computing and Information Systems)
Exhibition IT Services Pty Ltd
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: +61 2 9882 1300
f: +61 2 9882 3377


This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action
in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. Exhibition IT Services Pty LTD makes no
express or implied representation or warranty that this electronic
communication or any attachment is free from computer viruses or other
defects or conditions which could damage or interfere with the recipients
data, hardware or software.  This communication and any attachment may have
been modified or otherwise interfered with in the course of transmission.





[squid-users] Fw: squid_ldap_group config

2004-12-01 Thread Kelly_Connor




Hi all,

I hope this has not been addressed anywhere in the mailing lists.  I did a
search and couldn't find anything, and I've already RTFM'd.

I don't understand how to set up the squid_ldap_group external acl type.

We are running Novell eDirectory and using various LDAP groups to
(hopefully) control internet access for our various high school campuses.
We want to have different control lists based upon the user.  Students are
denied ftp downloads and are sent to a redirector/content filter, while we
IT people don't go to the redirector and get ftp downloads.

The man page for external_acl_type doesn't seem clear to me.

This is what I've got so far:

external_acl_type ldap_group %LOGIN /usr/sbin/squid_ldap_group -b basedn
-D squidaccount -w passwd -f
((cn=%v)(groupMembership=cn=group1dn)) -h ldap.host
external_acl_type ldap_group %LOGIN /usr/sbin/squid_ldap_group -b basedn
-D squidaccount -w passwd -f
((cn=%v)(groupMembership=cn=group2dn)) -h ldap.host

acl Restricted port 20 21 1025-65535

acl external ldap_group deny Restricted
acl external ldap_group allow Restricted

I'm certain I am doing something wrong with my acl external lines.  How
do I differentiate the two different groups?  How exactly is the
external_acl_type line used?  Is ldap_group a reserved phrase that has to
follow external_acl_type?  How do I return to squid the group membership
token for the user?

Thanks for any illumination...


Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [squid-users] Fw: squid_ldap_group config

2004-12-01 Thread Kelly_Connor




Hi Matt -

Your solution sounds pretty cool, but my boss is really pro-vendor
software and I have won a big point getting squid into our district.

However, he is dead set on keeping Websense as our content filter, and does
not want our internet system to become difficult to support if someone
leaves the department.

If I use the squid_ldap_auth, program, I can only use one group and I am
stuck in an accept/deny internet filtering role.  I had this working for a
while, but it does not fit our organization quite right.  I stumbled upon
squid_ldap_group and it sounds like it works perfectly, but I am really
confused as to how to use and external_acl_type role, and how to bring this
group information back to squid for potential redirection, ftp filtering or
user denial.

Is there anyone on this list who currently uses squid_ldap_group to
segregate internet traffic permission?

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 Matt Benjamin 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 m To 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 12/01/2004 10:39   cc 
 AM[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam  
   D. Gorski [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   Subject 
   Re: [squid-users] Fw:   
   squid_ldap_group config 
   
   
   
   
   
   




Kelly,

The intent of the Squid mechanism, is, I think, a bit obscure--hopefully
the authors will step forward and show how you set up the two distinct
external auth mechanisms it appears you need in order for Squid to a)
authenticate to LDAP b) do the group check.

However, our solution (which resembles that used in a commercial K12
proxy solution which I shall not name), is as follows:

1. We use one external authenticator, the squid_ldap_auth program
2. All traffic is sent to a customized Squidguard redirect_program--our
version combines a bunch of extant modifications, including LDAP
group-based ACLs, and a modified logging feature used to drive reporting
3. Any sort of authorization rule, including one forbidding specific
users/groups to visit FTP urls, would happen here.  For example, your
source group might be kids, and the destination group anything
matching an ^ftp://; regex.

We have some tweaks to Webmin, a real-time log parser, and reporting
tool we're releasing, that organize all this.

Matt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all,

I hope this has not been addressed anywhere in the mailing lists.  I did a
search and couldn't find anything, and I've already RTFM'd.

I don't understand how to set up the squid_ldap_group external acl type.

We are running Novell eDirectory and using various LDAP groups to
(hopefully) control internet access for our various high school campuses.
We want to have different control lists based upon the user.  Students are
denied ftp downloads and are sent to a redirector/content filter, while we
IT people don't go to the redirector and get ftp downloads.

The man page for external_acl_type doesn't seem clear to me.

This is what I've got so far:

external_acl_type ldap_group %LOGIN /usr/sbin/squid_ldap_group -b basedn
-D squidaccount -w passwd -f
((cn=%v)(groupMembership=cn=group1dn)) -h ldap.host
external_acl_type ldap_group %LOGIN /usr/sbin/squid_ldap_group -b basedn
-D squidaccount -w passwd -f
((cn=%v)(groupMembership=cn=group2dn)) -h ldap.host

acl Restricted port 20 21 1025-65535

acl external ldap_group deny Restricted
acl external ldap_group allow Restricted

I'm certain I am doing something wrong with my acl external lines.  How
do I differentiate the two different groups?  How exactly is the
external_acl_type line used?  Is ldap_group a reserved phrase that has to
follow external_acl_type?  How do I return to squid the group membership
token for the user?

Thanks for any illumination...


Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








Re: [squid-users] Reverse proxy performance in FreeBSD 5.3

2004-12-01 Thread Kelly_Connor




I get similar performance out of a Linux dual P3-500 Xeon box, but I run
about 50 redirectors off it and have about 24Mb bandwidth.

Are you running diskd?  Do you have SCSI/RAID?  How many peer caches are
subordinate to this one?

Kelly Connor
Network Technician
Gilbert Unified School District
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 Jeff Behl 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 com   To 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 12/01/2004 01:00   cc 
 PM
   Subject 
   [squid-users] Reverse proxy 
   performance in FreeBSD 5.3  
   
   
   
   
   
   




howdy,

I've got a dual proc AMD64 (2gHz) FreeBSD 5.3 system running two squid
processes (to take advantage of both CPUs).  Each process is doing
around 195 req/s, and the total bandwidth is ~40Mb/s (gig nic via bge
driver).  All content is being served out of memory (very little disk
activity).

Top shows

CPU states: 16.0% user,  0.0% nice, 42.7% system,  7.6% interrupt, 33.6%
idle
Mem: 898M Active, 569M Inact, 179M Wired, 214M Buf, 171M Free
Swap: 4069M Total, 4069M Free

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE  C   TIME   WCPUCPU COMMAND
14598 squid1080   463M   459M select 0  39.2H 59.96% 59.96% squid
14605 squid1050   421M   416M CPU0   1  38.4H 49.95% 49.95% squid

but the % system time can fluctuate up to 60 at times.  My question is
if this is about the type of performance I could expect, or if people
have seen better.  I was expecting to see much better performance,
seeing how everything is being served out of memory, but maybe I'm
asking too much?  Is this a FreeBSD issue (anybody else with similar
experience)?  A majority of the cpu time being spent in system would
seem to indictate such.

Any help/pointers/remarks appreciated

Jeff