Re: [squid-users] redirector with Shutdown flag

2004-11-04 Thread Valentin Chopov
Henrik,
I might be wrong but here is what I found.
In helper.c:GetFirstAvailable
There is no check at helper.c:GetFirstAvailable for flags.shutdown and
if the helper is still alive and already flagged with shutdown flag,
squid will keep sending requests to it.
Thanks,
Val
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Valentin Chopov wrote:
According to the Squid FAQ the only way to shutdown the redirectors is
to close their stdin (squid's stdout). My understanding is that the 
shutdown flag is only for squid and there is no way redirectors to know 
about it.
The redirector knows about it by the simple fact that stdin is EOF.
So if for some reason redirector send something to stdout (squid's stdin) 
after squid set the Shutdown flag, squid will keep this redirector in 
service ... am I right? Thanks, Val
Squid keeps the redirector in the table until the redirector acknowledges the 
close (by closing it's stdout) and exits, but it won't (and can't) send any 
new requests there as the communication channel squid->helper has been 
closed.

It can happen perfectly fine that a helper is shut down while processing a 
request. In this case the helper should send the response when done 
processing the current request and then exit.

Regards
Henrik



Re: [squid-users] redirector with Shutdown flag

2004-11-02 Thread Valentin Chopov
Henrik thanks.
According to the Squid FAQ the only way to shutdown the redirectors is
to close their stdin (squid's stdout). My understanding is that the 
shutdown flag is only for squid and there is no way redirectors to know 
about it. So if for some reason redirector send something to stdout 
(squid's stdin) after squid set the Shutdown flag, squid will keep this 
redirector in service ... am I right?
Thanks,
Val

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Valentin Chopov wrote:
Do you think it will be a good idea Squid continuously to remind these 
redirectors to shutdown (e.g. every 1h)?
The shutdown indication to the helper is permanent, always there. As soon as 
the helper tries to read the next request it notices..

Regards
Henrik



Re: [squid-users] redirector with Shutdown flag

2004-11-01 Thread Valentin Chopov
Henrik,
Do you think it will be a good idea Squid continuously to remind 
these redirectors to shutdown (e.g. every 1h)?

Thanks,
Val
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Valentin Chopov wrote:
How squid handles the redirectors with shutdown flag on. It looks that
the redirector  functions normaly even there is a shutdown flag.
The "shutdown" flag indicates Squid has requested this redirector to shut 
down, but the redirector has not yet acknowledged the shutdown by closing 
it's input to Squid.. (or put in simpler words, Squid has requested this 
redirector to exit, but it has not exited yet)

Regards
Henrik
==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


[squid-users] redirector with Shutdown flag

2004-10-28 Thread Valentin Chopov
Hi,
How squid handles the redirectors with shutdown flag on. It looks that
the redirector  functions normaly even there is a shutdown flag.
Here is the "URL Redirector Stats"
Thanks,
Val
---cut here---
Cache Manager menu
Redirector Statistics:
program: /usr/local/squid25/bin/redirectorun
number running: 9 of 8
requests sent: 3931155
replies received: 3931155
queue length: 0
avg service time: 5.21 msec
#   FD  PID # Requests  Flags   TimeOffset  Request
1   6   557 3484795 A S 0.001   0   (none)
1   9   31012   25593   A   0.003   0   (none)
2   10  31013   2587A   0.002   0   (none)
3   11  31014   574 A   0.003   0   (none)
4   12  31015   291 A   0.008   0   (none)
5   13  31016   198 A   0.008   0   (none)
6   15  31017   166 A   0.008   0   (none)
7   251 31018   148 A   0.008   0   (none)
8   255 31019   130 A   0.008   0   (none)
Flags key:
   A = ALIVE
   B = BUSY
   C = CLOSING
   S = SHUTDOWN
Number of requests bypassed because all redirectors were busy: 32897
---cut here---
==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


RE: [squid-users] diskd VS aufs

2004-06-30 Thread Valentin Chopov
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Elsen Marc wrote:

Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid
-z). But what
 No, you don't.
makes you conclude that "FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
Under Solaris
and Linux use aufs."?
 I seem to remember this was a FAQ, I may be wrong, at least I can't
find it for the moment.
From what I remember : under FreeBSD support for shared mem is better
which diskd heavily uses.
Linux and Solaris are better on thread support, which aufs uses.
M.

We are running Squid on  FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT with aufs. It looks that KSE 
improved the thread support in the FreeBSD.

Val


Re: [squid-users] Squid CPU Performance

2003-11-21 Thread Valentin Chopov
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Mark Pelkoski wrote:
>
> > List,
> > I FINALLY implemented a Squid server into my production environment
> > today. It is squid-2.5.STABLE4-20031029 on a Quad Proc Xeon 500MHz with
> > 1M Cache and 3x9Gig Raid-5 dedicated for cache and 2x9Gig Raid-1 for OS
> > Redhat 9.0. I tested this exact server config with 74 users and
> > performance was pretty good for 800 Reqs/Min. Now in Production I have
> > 325+ users at 2700 Reqs/Min and performance stinks. It's like being on a
> > dial-up connection. 3 of the procs are sitting below 1%. The other is
> > used by Squid at 99.9%. It there any way to speed up performance on a
> > multi-proc system? TIA.
>
> not really... it will however go a lot faster if you unraid the 3 9gb
> drives and treat each one as a seperate cache dir...
>

I agree with Joel, and also you can use  "cache_dir  diskd" and
this maybe will give some job for other processors too, there will be will
be 3 separate "diskd" processes.

>
>
> > Mark Pelkoski
> >
> >
>
> --
> --
> Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
>
>
>




Re: [squid-users] cisco wccp problem

2003-08-27 Thread Valentin Chopov
what is the ouput of  the "tcpdump proto gre" on the Squid box ?

Val

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Kuba Leszewski wrote:

> Damian-Grint Philip wrote:
>
> >What messages do you get if you type the following in at your Cisco router
> >while browser traffic is crossing it?
> >Term mon
> >Debug ip icmp
> >
> >
> Well, actually there's nothing.
> Some ICMP packets, but none connected with the http traffic I generate.
>
> Kuba
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==




[squid-users] msblaster worm, squid & wccp ?

2003-08-14 Thread Valentin Chopov
Hi,

According to the W32.Blaster.Worm technical details, it will start
DoS attack to Windows Update Site after Aug 16, 2003 .
If this DoS attack will be on port 80 what will happen with the squid
running as a transparent proxy with wccp?
BTW, I couldn't find an info if the attack will be on port 80 or port 443.

Thanks,
Val



==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==




Re: [squid-users] Squid, WCCP, and Loading?

2003-08-08 Thread Valentin Chopov
Did you try "no ip route-cache" on the 7200  FastEthernet Interface (the
interface wich sends/receives wccp GRE packets to/from your Squid box.

Val

==
Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==




[squid-users] cache.log varyEvaluateMatch, clientProcessHit

2003-02-28 Thread Valentin Chopov
Hello,
I'm getting the folloing in the cache.log file and it seems this happens
with kazaa sites only. Any  idea what that means.
Thanks,
Val

2003/02/28 07:56:34| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second
attempt
, 'http://desktop.kazaa.com/us/images/home/60_60_braidedhair_h.gif'
'accept-enco
ding="gzip,%20deflate",
user-agent="Mozilla%2f4.0%20(compatible%3b%20MSIE%206.0%
3b%20Windows%20NT%205.1)"'
2003/02/28 07:56:34| clientProcessHit: Vary object loop!
2003/02/28 08:09:41| varyEvaluateMatch: Oops. Not a Vary match on second
attempt
, 'http://search.kazaa.com/us/images/spacer.gif'
'accept-encoding="gzip,%20defla
te",
user-agent="Mozilla%2f4.0%20(compatible%3b%20MSIE%206.0%3b%20Windows%20NT%2
05.1%3b%20YComp%205.0.0.0)"'
2003/02/28 08:09:41| clientProcessHit: Vary object loop!


==
Valentin S. Chopov, CCNP
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==




Re: [squid-users] FrontPage sites cacheing

2003-02-20 Thread Valentin Chopov
Henrik,

thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately not using  WCCP is not an option
for us;) I don't know if you mean "ie_refresh" option but it's tutned on
in our case. Is there something else what we can do?

Thanks again,

Val




On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Don't use interception (including WCCP).
>
> Using interception hides the fact that you are using a proxy cache
> from the browsers, so the browsers do not know they need to include
> cache instructions to instruct caches to fetch a fresh copy when the
> user pushes the reload button..
>
> Configure the browser to use a proxy and things should work much
> better.
>
>
> There is also some (one) options in squid.conf which may help..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
> On Thursday 20 February 2003 19.48, Valentin Chopov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems I have a problem with FrontPage sites cacheing.
> > I got complaints that after making  changes to their web
> > pages (which are hosted on  the servers outside our network) the
> > updates can not be seen behind  our squid proxy servers, even after
> > hitting refresh on the browser.
> > I think the most of complains are about FrontPage web sites but I
> > didn't check all of them.
> > We are running Squid 2.5 +  WCCP.  Currently I'm fixing this with
> > ACLs on the Cisco routers to exclude the IPs from the WCCP.
> > Is there a way to fix this globally?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Val
> >
> > ==
> > Valentin S. Chopov, CCNP
> > Sys/Net Admin
> > SEI Data Inc.
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ==
>
>
>




[squid-users] FrontPage sites cacheing

2003-02-20 Thread Valentin Chopov
Hi,

It seems I have a problem with FrontPage sites cacheing.
I got complaints that after making  changes to their web
pages (which are hosted on  the servers outside our network) the updates
can not be seen behind  our squid proxy servers, even after hitting
refresh on the browser.
I think the most of complains are about FrontPage web sites but I didn't
check all of them.
We are running Squid 2.5 +  WCCP.  Currently I'm fixing this with ACLs on
the Cisco routers to exclude the IPs from the WCCP.
Is there a way to fix this globally?

Thanks,

Val

==
Valentin S. Chopov, CCNP
Sys/Net Admin
SEI Data Inc.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==