[squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Mark Wiater
Hi,

One of my users is getting an error message when accessing a page
through Squid but the page loads fine in Firefox, IE & Netscape
directly.

The headers that the HTTP server is returning look odd to me. 

First, the Date: field has two dates on the same line, comma separated.
Same thing for the Server line. Microsoft-IIS/5.0, Results CASI Net 

The Connection: header also has close, close

And finally, there are two distinct HTTP header lines. The first is the
first line in the data section of the IP packet, HTTP/1.x 200 OK. The
second comes after the close, the 6th line, and is: HTTP/1.1: 200 OK.

Any ideas why Squid is detecting an error while browsers render the
page?

Thanks

-- 
Mark 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Hi,
Mark Wiater wrote:
Hi,
One of my users is getting an error message when accessing a page
through Squid but the page loads fine in Firefox, IE & Netscape
directly.
The headers that the HTTP server is returning look odd to me. 

First, the Date: field has two dates on the same line, comma separated.
Same thing for the Server line. Microsoft-IIS/5.0, Results CASI Net 

The Connection: header also has close, close
And finally, there are two distinct HTTP header lines. The first is the
first line in the data section of the IP packet, HTTP/1.x 200 OK. The
second comes after the close, the 6th line, and is: HTTP/1.1: 200 OK.
Any ideas why Squid is detecting an error while browsers render the
page?
If it has a malformed Date, Server and Connection header, then it is 
very very broken, and likely makes no sense to squid.  It probably makes 
no sense to your browser either, but it likely just ignores it.  You're 
really asking "why does something which is obviously broken not work?" ;-)

Can you tell us what the URL is?
Have you specified the relaxed_header_parser directive in your 
squid.conf, and if so, what is it set to?  There is an explanation about 
this in your squid.conf.

What version of squid are you using?  (squid -v)
I know, heaps of questions, but this is coming up as a daily question on 
this mailing list...

Reuben



Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Mark Wiater
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:42 +1300, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> If it has a malformed Date, Server and Connection header, then it is 
> very very broken, and likely makes no sense to squid.  It probably makes 
> no sense to your browser either, but it likely just ignores it.  You're 
> really asking "why does something which is obviously broken not work?" ;-)
> 
Afraid of that. I guess I knew I was asking whether that was malformed
or not.

> Can you tell us what the URL is?

I would have included it in the original post, but needed to check on
the answer to that question myself.

http://survey2.opinionresearch.com/surveys/1417506start.htm?
_s=34732ENG-410215

I used both ethereal and liveheaders in firefox to determine what was in
the http headers.

> Have you specified the relaxed_header_parser directive in your 
> squid.conf, and if so, what is it set to?  There is an explanation about 
> this in your squid.conf.
> 
I have not. There is not such directive in my squid.conf.

> What version of squid are you using?  (squid -v)
2.5 stable8, it's an rpm package for Fedora Core 3.

squid-2.5.STABLE8-1.FC3.1


> 
> I know, heaps of questions, but this is coming up as a daily question on 
> this mailing list...
> 
> Reuben


Thanks

mark




Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Mark Wiater wrote:
What version of squid are you using?  (squid -v)
2.5 stable8, it's an rpm package for Fedora Core 3.
squid-2.5.STABLE8-1.FC3.1
Upgrading to 2.5.STABLE9 helps some as the parser was relaxed a bit more 
there by default, but no guarantees as the server you asked on is quite 
broken...

Regards
Henrik


Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Mark Wiater wrote:
What version of squid are you using?  (squid -v)
2.5 stable8, it's an rpm package for Fedora Core 3.
squid-2.5.STABLE8-1.FC3.1
Upgrading to 2.5.STABLE9 helps some as the parser was relaxed a bit more 
there by default, but no guarantees as the server you asked on is quite 
broken...
Just verified and Squid-2.5.STABLE9 accepts this response in it's default 
settings.

Regards
Henrik


Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-07 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Hi,
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Mark Wiater wrote:
What version of squid are you using?  (squid -v)
2.5 stable8, it's an rpm package for Fedora Core 3.
squid-2.5.STABLE8-1.FC3.1

Upgrading to 2.5.STABLE9 helps some as the parser was relaxed a bit 
more there by default, but no guarantees as the server you asked on is 
quite broken...

Just verified and Squid-2.5.STABLE9 accepts this response in it's 
default settings.

Regards
Henrik
I'll put a request in Fedora Core bugzilla, for the maintainer to 
upgrade the package to -STABLE9..

reuben


Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-08 Thread Mark Wiater
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 13:17 +1300, Reuben Farrelly wrote:

> I'll put a request in Fedora Core bugzilla, for the maintainer to 
> upgrade the package to -STABLE9..
> 
> reuben

Wow. thanks.

So this is safe? Has anyone looked into the security aspects of very
badly implemented HTTP Headers (and their Servers)?





Re: [squid-users] Strange HTTP Header causing error message from squid to user

2005-03-08 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Mark Wiater wrote:
So this is safe? Has anyone looked into the security aspects of very
badly implemented HTTP Headers (and their Servers)?
I have tried to analyze the impacts of each workaround implemented, but 
recommends "relaxed_header_parser off" for the security minded even if 
this makes a large number of web sites inaccessible, especially so if you 
are in a cache hierarchy with other proxy brands or versions.

Regards
Henrik