Re: [squid-users] cache machine specs
On 5/10/05, Slacker Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we are going to order new machine for cache/proxy server squid we are already running cache servers all on Intel plateform Given your limited performance needs, I would suggest sticking with Intel processors, putting your money towards more RAM, faster disks, or building two identical load-balanced caches. This time we want to give a try to AMD processor, what you ppl things which processor would be benfiical 1) Athlon 32bit or 64bit? 2) opetron ? I far i can understand, I don't think 64 bit will significantly improve performance for cache/proxy servers. I would tend to agree, but it'd be an interesting benchmark to try if you have the time and hardware to spare. users to support 250 pipe to internet : 2 mbit users are dynamic not a corporate users, but dialup users. Given these limitations on the maximum total and per-user throughput, you could almost certainly get away with building on an old (circa 1998) 200Mhz Celeron desktop PC with IDE. The limiting factor is going to the dialup modem hop to the end user. In this sort of case, you might want to consider deploying an optimizing proxy, akin to Juno's SpeedBand(tm) and similar buzzword-compliant offerings. I will appreciate if someone using AMD gimme suggestions which... processor to select + ram (3 gb would be enough?) Yes, 3GB should be more than sufficient, even for ten times your userbase and bandwidth. + 3 x 36 gb (sata)? One drive dedicated to the OS, a second drive for cache_dir, a third for squid logs? Or a hardware RAID array? + mobo Your choice of motherboard is going to be strongly dependent on the one factor you don't mention in this message- the OS. Are you running Squid on OpenBSD? Solaris? FreeeBSD? Some other Unix-like operating system?;) For example, if you are going to run a Dual AMD64 machine under OpenBSD 3.7 (due out May 19, 2005), then you would want to ask about motherboards on an OpenBSD mailing list. If you were to choose Solaris, your only supported choices would be motherboards listed on Sun's official supported hardware list. Kevin Kadow
Re: [squid-users] cache machine specs
hi Kevin Thanks for your reply On 5/12/05, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/05, Slacker Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we are going to order new machine for cache/proxy server squid we are already running cache servers all on Intel plateform Given your limited performance needs, I would suggest sticking with Intel processors, putting your money towards more RAM, faster disks, or building two identical load-balanced caches. Agreed This time we want to give a try to AMD processor, what you ppl things which processor would be benfiical 1) Athlon 32bit or 64bit? 2) opetron ? I far i can understand, I don't think 64 bit will significantly improve performance for cache/proxy servers. I would tend to agree, but it'd be an interesting benchmark to try if you have the time and hardware to spare. heh tough budget for hardware ;) users to support 250 pipe to internet : 2 mbit users are dynamic not a corporate users, but dialup users. Given these limitations on the maximum total and per-user throughput, you could almost certainly get away with building on an old (circa 1998) 200Mhz Celeron desktop PC with IDE. The limiting factor is going to the dialup modem hop to the end user. In this sort of case, you might want to consider deploying an optimizing proxy, akin to Juno's SpeedBand(tm) and similar buzzword-compliant offerings. I will appreciate if someone using AMD gimme suggestions which... processor to select + ram (3 gb would be enough?) Yes, 3GB should be more than sufficient, even for ten times your userbase and bandwidth. right, + 3 x 36 gb (sata)? One drive dedicated to the OS, a second drive for cache_dir, a third for squid logs? Or a hardware RAID array? actaully to achieve good through put ;) one for OS , and two for cache_dir + mobo Your choice of motherboard is going to be strongly dependent on the one factor you don't mention in this message- the OS. my first choice would be ofcourse nothing but slackware Are you running Squid on OpenBSD? Solaris? FreeeBSD? second choice freebsd Some other Unix-like operating system?;) For example, if you are going to run a Dual AMD64 machine under OpenBSD 3.7 (due out May 19, 2005), then you would want to ask about motherboards on an OpenBSD mailing list. If you were to choose Solaris, your only supported choices would be motherboards listed on Sun's official supported hardware list. Kevin Kadow regards
[squid-users] cache machine specs
hi list sorry i'm going to ask a very dump question however I need you gurus suggestions :) we are going to order new machine for cache/proxy server squid we are already running cache servers all on Intel plateform This time we want to give a try to AMD processor, what you ppl things which processor would be benfiical 1) Athlon 32bit or 64bit? 2) opetron ? I far i can understand, I don't think 64 bit will significantly improve performance for cache/proxy servers. 64 bit is worth it only for computationally intensive tasks, imho. At least with ordinary working set sizes. users to support 250 pipe to internet : 2 mbit users are dynamic not a corporate users, but dialup users. I will appreciate if someone using AMD gimme suggestions which... processor to select + mobo + ram (3 gb would be enough?) + 3 x 36 gb (sata)? Thanks and regards
