Re: [squid-users] performance datas for Squid
For this 15-25MB/s, do you mean bits or bytes? Thanks bits Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations? I can't remember exactly - I'll probably compare them both again soon. J 2008/12/7 Ken DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --- On Sun, 12/7/08, john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] GDSF on disk, LRU on Memory. Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations? that's serving between 15-25Mb/s of outbound traffic. For this 15-25MB/s, do you mean bits or bytes? Thanks. Ken.
[squid-users] performance datas for Squid
Has anyone get Squid's best performance datas on a server box with common hardware (ie,DELL 1950)? These datas include: 1) concurrent connections; 2) flow capacity; 3) TPS (http transaction per second). Thanks.
Re: [squid-users] performance datas for Squid
I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies. They are all HP DL380/385's G4 Machines (about 3 years old) with 7GB to 12 GB per machine, 4 unraided 15K SCSI HDD for caches on each machine. Mem Caches are 30% of the available ram on each box and each disk has a 10GB cache. I only cache small objects (96K max). GDSF on disk, LRU on Memory. My normal traffic if 200-400 http requests per second per box (I don't use ICP), with 5-20% CPU utilization - that's serving between 15-25Mb/s of outbound traffic. I have peaked at 800 req/s with 40% CPU (the current origin servers may be a bottleneck though.) I intend to test new machines soon using large RAM 64GB cache and small disk cache 500MB. J 2008/12/6 Ken DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone get Squid's best performance datas on a server box with common hardware (ie,DELL 1950)? These datas include: 1) concurrent connections; 2) flow capacity; 3) TPS (http transaction per second). Thanks.
Re: [squid-users] performance datas for Squid
I should add.. hit ratios are 90 or request but only 20-30% of volume with my current solution. My requirement is to reduce load on the backend. J 2008/12/6 john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies. They are all HP DL380/385's G4 Machines (about 3 years old) with 7GB to 12 GB per machine, 4 unraided 15K SCSI HDD for caches on each machine. Mem Caches are 30% of the available ram on each box and each disk has a 10GB cache. I only cache small objects (96K max). GDSF on disk, LRU on Memory. My normal traffic if 200-400 http requests per second per box (I don't use ICP), with 5-20% CPU utilization - that's serving between 15-25Mb/s of outbound traffic. I have peaked at 800 req/s with 40% CPU (the current origin servers may be a bottleneck though.) I intend to test new machines soon using large RAM 64GB cache and small disk cache 500MB. J 2008/12/6 Ken DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone get Squid's best performance datas on a server box with common hardware (ie,DELL 1950)? These datas include: 1) concurrent connections; 2) flow capacity; 3) TPS (http transaction per second). Thanks.
Re: [squid-users] performance datas for Squid
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: john Moylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] GDSF on disk, LRU on Memory. Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations? that's serving between 15-25Mb/s of outbound traffic. For this 15-25MB/s, do you mean bits or bytes? Thanks. Ken.
Re: [squid-users] performance datas for Squid
Ken DBA wrote: Has anyone get Squid's best performance datas on a server box with common hardware (ie,DELL 1950)? These datas include: 1) concurrent connections; 2) flow capacity; 3) TPS (http transaction per second). Thanks. What I have so far collected is at: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks John Moylan: Can we get specific numbers from each, or at least your best performant squid? Calculated as described on that page so I can add your info there? Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE10 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3 or 3.0.STABLE11-RC1
