Re: [squid-users] Transparent Squid Gtalk Gmail And Other HTTPS

2010-01-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 17.01.10 00:42, anand phulwani wrote:
 My problem is ,i am using squid 2.7 as a transparent proxy on Ubuntu
 Server 9.10 on Sun VirtualBox and my network is divided into two groups,
 to one i want to allow gtalk  gmail and to other i want to allow just
 gmail.
 
 I came to know that one solution could be WPAD/PAC.
 But I am looking for other alternative. i tried
 a) Recompiling it with --enable-ssl and installing,which allowed me to 
 control gtalk
 but it stopped opening gmail.com
 b) So i thought of redirecting 0:442, 444:65535 to port 3128(http_port) and 
 masquerading port 443.this allowed gmail,but removed the access control over 
 gtalk
 c) then i reverted to snapshot when i repeated the step a ,my gtalk is unable 
 to connect, i dont understand what had i missed(there is something i have 
 missed i just dont know what i am missing).
 d) then i tried 3129(https_port) and generated key and certificate as a wild 
 try.but still gtalk is unable to connect.

 Also I Would Like To Ask
 e)Can I Use Squid 3.0 For HTTPS?, although it is still not maintained by 
 ubuntu core developers and is not quoted as stable.Is it reliable?.

no. intercepting (called transparent proxying) SSL protocols is not possible
without dangerous side-effects.

Also, intercepting other protocols than HTTP is mostly impossible.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
   One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, 
One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them 


RE: [squid-users] Transparent Squid Gtalk Gmail And Other HTTPS

2010-01-26 Thread Johnson, S
Did you look at SSLbump?