Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-03-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Closed #2208.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#event-4402476534___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-03-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
OK, thanks - closing this one then, discussions can continue on the new PR 
#2657.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-789771983___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-03-03 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
lreprxoy name is changed to lrkproxy

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-789677108___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I think it would be good to create a PR with the new name, so it will be a 
clean merge of the module. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-784263655___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-22 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
I am planning to change lreproxy to lrkproxy. any idea in this regard?
@miconda, let me know do i have to create new PR after renaming module or some 
things else?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-783338108___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-21 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
lreproxy is updated right now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-782847249___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-21 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@mojtabaesfandiari pushed 0 commits.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208/files/c077c81cb3e02b207eea686d7963720c076752e9..584f50b37edebf72eecf2f49d947bb4cc99f87a1
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-21 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Please adjust your commit messages to follow the project's guidelines for 
commit messages. Just committing with the module name is not explaining 
anything.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-782843875___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-21 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@mojtabaesfandiari pushed 1 commit.

0a8717667a0ccdb5ae1ae9f32077d0d9e053d634  lreproxy


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208/files/beda3fef42dfbbe96d76cf62e6b1a9f56bc957af..0a8717667a0ccdb5ae1ae9f32077d0d9e053d634
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-17 Thread Julien Chavanton
> @jchavanton, Would you please let me know more details related to first 
> comment that you mentioned?
> The second comment is accepted and i will do it.
> Let me know how do you test it? What unexpected performance degradation did 
> you see?

@mojtabaesfandiari 
Considering that my test report is very limited, we can ignore the comment of 
signaling degradation, it may have been caused by a miss-config, like the one 
causing the crash. I was simply curious to know if you did some small sustained 
load tests.
But now that I think about it, it seems obvious you did such tests since you 
have shared a presentation comparing load tests performance, I am guessing 
these tests where using the module as well. In this case this seems like a 
significant load testing effort.

My previous comment :
"I left it running for several hours, no more crash, there seems to be 
something odd with Kamailio responsiveness degrading over time. Could be 
related to my config, did you ever do long lasting end2end tests ?"

I am also glad that you that may have found an issue related to duplicate 
ports, not sure I will find more time to test again shortly.
I have a very good impression on the work done ! 

About my other comment on the module interface, it is is still a problem, it 
should trigger a compilation warning, if you do `make clean && make` in the 
module folder.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-780388746___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-17 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
Actually, I am planning for having a workshop of using lreproxy( LRKProxy ) as 
soon.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-780369541___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-17 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@jchavanton, Would you please let me know more details related to first comment 
that you mentioned?
The second comment is accepted and i will do it.
Let me know how do you test it?What unexpected performance degradation did you 
see? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-780367930___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-17 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@jchavanton,there was a quite bit issue when the lreproxy kernel engine 
received duplicate ports. You could check it after update. Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-780365977___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-16 Thread Julien Chavanton
Few comments on the module being ready to merge :
- I noticed the module interface was outdated it should be tested one more 
time, `child_init` and `mod_init` may not be working.
- The documentation is good however it is made in the README instead of the XML 
files
- Based on my quick tests there was an unexpected performance degradation seen 
this may not be a real concern if the module is mainly still an alpha POC

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-780015058___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-16 Thread Olle E. Johansson
As before, I strongly suggest that you remove all references to "RTPengine" as 
it is another product, not a generic name for an RTP proxy.  LRKproxy is better.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-779620679___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-15 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@miconda Sure, although, lreproxy can be searched and tracked on internet, but 
i think LRKProxy is better. What do you think? If yes, i have to change the 
name of lreproxy in project. let me do it during next days, Also some updates 
will publish as soon. Thanks
@jchavanton I am trying to check what you mentioned, Just let me a few days, I 
will update you during next days. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-779247638___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
@jchavanton - is the module ready to merge in your opinion (docs, code, or what 
you had time to look over)?

@mojtabaesfandiari - is it ok to rename the module to LRKProxy as you made a 
remark on a comment above?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-779122253___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-12 Thread Julien Chavanton
I left it running for several hours, no more crash, there seems to be something 
odd with kamailio responsiveness degrading over time.
Could be related to my config, did you ever do long lasting end2end tests ?

One obvious missing feature is hosted NAT traversal/port latching, this will 
greatly reduce the use cases where it can be use.

Nice work !

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-778279756___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-11 Thread Julien Chavanton
I was running with the default config 
```
sudo python3 pylreproxy.py
```
lreproxy was using a fake IP not present in the system, maybe this was part of 
the problem generating the crash ...

I got one working test.


```
/etc/py_lre_proxy/py_lre_proxy.ini
[DEFAULT]   


start_port : 2
end_port : 3
current_port : 2
internal_ip : 192.168.0.111
external_ip : 192.168.0.111
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-777853183___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-11 Thread Julien Chavanton
@mojtabaesfandiari 

Just made a few tests, documentation is good, well done.

However I got a crash quickly, probably due to miss config, but crash in the 
kernel module makes it much more problematic.

```
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195416] RIP: 
0010:main_hook_post+0x70/0xb0 [lreproxy_module]
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195422] Code: c1 e5 02 41 
83 e5 3c 4d 01 e5 74 e0 41 0f b7 45 02 49 89 f6 69 c0 47 86 c8 61 c1 e8 16 48 
8b 1c c5 c0 b3 0c c1 48 85 db 74 c2 <8b> 43 1c 4c 89 e2 4c 89 ee 4c 89 f7 41 89 
44 24 0c 0f b7 43 24 66
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195426] RSP: 
0018:c39844dd7ad8 EFLAGS: 00010286
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195431] RAX: 
fd02 RBX: c9ec991dd1f95aa5 RCX: 
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195434] RDX: 
d43c RSI:  RDI: 9fa6df1948d8
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195437] RBP: 
c39844dd7af8 R08: 9fa6df1948d8 R09: 0006
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195440] R10: 
1550 R11: 0010 R12: 9fa6df194810
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195443] R13: 
9fa6df194824 R14: 9fa5dd67f100 R15: 00b4
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195448] FS:  
7f3dda056700() GS:9fa6fc44() knlGS:
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195452] CS:  0010 DS:  
ES:  CR0: 80050033
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195456] CR2: 
0293af68 CR3: 00050d1c0006 CR4: 003606e0
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195462] DR0: 
 DR1:  DR2: 
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195465] DR3: 
 DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 0400
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195467] Call Trace:
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195478]  
nf_hook_slow+0x48/0xc0
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195485]  ip_output+0xcf/0xe0
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195492]  ? 
__ip_finish_output+0x1d0/0x1d0
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195498]  
ip_local_out+0x3b/0x50
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195503]  
ip_send_skb+0x19/0x40
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195509]  
udp_send_skb.isra.48+0x156/0x370
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195515]  
udp_sendmsg+0x6c3/0xd10
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195521]  ? 
ip_do_fragment+0x530/0x530
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195530]  ? 
__switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195535]  ? 
__switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195540]  ? 
__switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195546]  ? 
_cond_resched+0x19/0x40
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.19]  ? 
aa_sk_perm+0x43/0x190
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195559]  ? 
__switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195565]  
inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195569]  ? 
inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195577]  
sock_sendmsg+0x5c/0x70
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195582]  
__sys_sendto+0x13f/0x180
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195590]  ? 
hrtimer_nanosleep+0xc0/0x150
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195596]  ? 
hrtimer_init_sleeper+0x90/0x90
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195601]  
__x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195608]  
do_syscall_64+0x57/0x190
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195614]  
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195618] RIP: 
0033:0x7f3de55b9a82
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195623] Code: 48 83 ec 18 
44 89 4c 24 08 e8 aa f5 ff ff 44 8b 4c 24 08 89 c5 4d 89 f8 45 89 f2 4c 89 ea 
4c 89 e6 89 df b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 3a 89 ef 48 89 44 24 
08 e8 da f5 ff ff 48 8b
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195628] RSP: 
002b:7f3dda055b10 EFLAGS: 0293 ORIG_RAX: 002c
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195636] RAX: 
ffda RBX: 000a RCX: 7f3de55b9a82
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195639] RDX: 
00ac RSI: 7f3dd0018bc8 RDI: 000a
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195641] RBP: 
 R08: 7f3dd0017c2c R09: 0010
Feb 11 14:09:04 anton-ThinkPad-P43s kernel: [225916.195644] 

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
yes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-775820414___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-09 Thread Giacomo Vacca
@mojtabaesfandiari is this the source code of the kernel module you mentioned 
(which I think was part of Q3 in this thread)? 
https://github.com/mojtabaesfandiari/py-lreproxy/tree/main/lib/c

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-775813426___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
For example, some upcoming updates are:
Multiple NIC relaying.
Video supporting.
Some quite bit changes for relaying RTP to unix socket.
:)


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-775808351___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@jchavanton Sure, feel free for using it right now.
It could be used right now, But because this module is new, it might be 
updated, 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-775806425___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-02-08 Thread Julien Chavanton
@mojtabaesfandiari did you end-up sharing your code, opensource it ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-775314438___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-01-07 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@miconda Thanks for your suggestion about its name. I agree with you. The name 
could be change LRKProxy or something else.
I dont want to say this module has more performant than rtpengine or compare 
with other media engine. But just as you mentioned, the rtpengine does already 
kernel/iptables-based forwarding. It means it works in LOCAL INPUT in Netfilter 
Linux
networking stack to perform packet handling while this module works in 
PREROUTING in Netfilter before the routing decision. "All the packets, with no 
exceptions, hit this hook, which is reached before the routing decision and 
after all the IP header sanity checks are fulfilled. 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-756082259___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-01-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
In Kamailio we accept modules that offer the same/similar functionality that is 
provided by other modules. So from this point of view, it is not a problem that 
we already have rtpproxy, rtpengine or mediaproxy as alternatives for relaying 
RTP packets.

Personally, as I understood after a brief check, I can't see this module being 
more performant than rtpengine in any way, because rtpengine does already 
kernel/iptables-based forwarding. But performance is also not a criterion to 
accept a contribution.

First criterion is to be sure is no conflict in terms of copyright. Second is 
not to be confusing in relation with the other existing modules. And, the 
third, very important as well, is that the author of the module is willing to 
maintain and support the module for at least a few years.

>From my point of view, the second is quite debatable, because, as I 
>understand, the LREProxy name expands to Light-RTP-Engine-Proxy. In my 
>opinion, that suggests it is a proxy for the existing RTPEngine, which 
>obviously is not the case. From what we have now, it is also a little bit 
>confusing considering we have both RTP+Proxy and RTP+Engine, this one is 
>somehow combining the both.

Also, from a personal point of view, `Proxy` is a generic term (used in things 
like RTPProxy or MediaProxy) referring mainly to `get-in/send-out`, while 
`Engine` suggests more, like `processing`, `transformation`,  ... which clearly 
the existing RTPEngine does with encryption/decryption or transcoding.

If LREProxy aims to focus on performance, I would propose to change the `E` in 
the name suggest what this module does, like `LRKProxy` 
(`Light-RTP-Kernel-Proxy`) or `LRIProxy` (`Light-RTP-IPTable-Proxy`), or 
meaning of `E` in something that relates, like `Express` 
(`Light-RTP-Express-Proxy`). This will greatly avoid any confusion with 
existing modules, making this one distinct in name and purpose.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-753666893___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2021-01-03 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9303608

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-753577000___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-21 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@mojtabaesfandiari pushed 1 commit.

beda3fef42dfbbe96d76cf62e6b1a9f56bc957af  lreproxy


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208/files/c5efad09dd821e1a3f3c2c037a6461c7060775bc..beda3fef42dfbbe96d76cf62e6b1a9f56bc957af
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-20 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
the lreproxy module is updated.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-748595933___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-20 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@mojtabaesfandiari pushed 1 commit.

c5efad09dd821e1a3f3c2c037a6461c7060775bc  lreproxy


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208/files/15fd09bb5e4d49bb9d61ee067a17e87fc9bf4abb..c5efad09dd821e1a3f3c2c037a6461c7060775bc
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-17 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
The Lreproxy service is published in my git, The insulation help is in Readme 
file. It might be confusing, 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-747260908___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
Also i could have online demo in realtime scenario to show it's performance. 
Actually we used offloading technique  in lreproxy. Our resaults are published 
in our paper. :))

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-742017006___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
The lreproxy engine with Python had done before and everyone could use the 
lreproxy after i push the service in github.
In regard of comparison with rtpengine, i suggest check it in practical 
scenario.
While the lreproxy could also works with multiple rtpengine services in cloud 
sulotions.
Just let me share it after preparing README file.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-742013492___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-09 Thread Julien Chavanton
Hi Motjaba, I found your answers very confusing, here is what I 
understand/deduct.

1- We can not conclude that lreproxy is faster than rtpengine since rtpengine 
was not tested with its kernel module.

2- No one can use the lreproxy module since there python/C code required is not 
developed yet.

In would recommend to close the PR and consider opening later when this module 
will become usable by kamailio users.

If you want to conclude that this media proxy is faster than RTPengine, I would 
also recommend that you run the tests again making sure that  RTPengine is 
using its Kernel module.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-741821950___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-09 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
Sure, We have to develop a kernel module for lreproxy for forwarding RTP 
packets based on SDP properties.
The LREProxy engine will share in git site

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-741600564___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-07 Thread Julien Chavanton
About Q3, can you add a link to the source code how can anyone use it ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-740307942___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-07 Thread Julien Chavanton
About Q1, I am not sure how to interpret your answer, RTP engine is using 
IPtables with the kernel module, but you need to build it properly and load it, 
did you do it explicitly ?

The step to load it :
```
# RUN echo " building IP iptables-extension" \
#&& cd /git/rtpengine/iptables-extension \
#&& cp libxt_RTPENGINE.so $(pkg-config xtables --variable=xtlibdir)

# RUN echo " building Kernel module" \
#&& cd /git/rtpengine/kernel-module \
#&& make && cp xt_RTPENGINE.ko /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates \
#&& depmod -a

```


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-740307487___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-07 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@jchavanton Thanks for asking some important question,
Q1: Yes, Because RTPengine use local hooking in network stack while this module 
works in prerouting hooking in network stack.
Q2: We have completely different designed hash search index based of SDP 
parameter in session. It no have relation to libnetfilter, Connection tracking 
or etc.
Q3: It composed of two different layer as i mentioned before. LREProxy engine 
is developed with Python Service, Kernel part and Unix sokect section. Also we 
are planing to implement the python section with C again, but later:)  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-740233175___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-12-07 Thread Julien Chavanton
Few questions out of curiosity ...

Did you benchmark RTPengine with the kernel module or without ?

I have the impression that this solution is using libnetfilter, queue, etc ?

Doe it mean that everything is self contain or the code to manage libnetfiler 
is somewhere else ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-740139347___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-11-25 Thread Julien Chavanton
Considering the existing modules related to RTP 
```
rtp_media_server.html
rtpengine.html
rtpproxy.html
```
I would recommend adding RTP at the beginning of the name, to make sure anyone 
can immediately assume this is about RTP forwarding/relaying/proxying

rtp_lr or rtp_light or `rtp_lw_relay` lightweight based on your previous name 
and presentation 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-733856384___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-06-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
@miconda I had a conversation with the author of the pull request, he wants to 
rework the code substancially. I don't think this should be merged in this form.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-651976347___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-06-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Short note to say that probably branching of 5.4 will happen soon, if you want 
this merged for 5.4.x release series, then it has to be made ready during the 
next days.

For the code you wrote, then you put your copyright. For the code you took from 
other places, you need to copy over the copyright.

Anyone else to review this PR?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-651643780___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-10 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
@sergey-safarov Just a quite little, I should look it more  and compare its 
results with my results.
Thanks for sharing it

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-597053485___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
@sobomax - thanks for looking into it.

@mojtabaesfandiari - if there are continuous parts of code copied over from an 
existing module such as rtpproxy, you have to keep original copyright line and 
add yours for the additions. You can split the file in two, one with copied 
code and one with your code, if you want to have them clearly separate.

I haven't compared any files to have an opinion on it, but if there is a 
copyright dispute, it should be settled before merging.

@mojtabaesfandiari - as I looked a bit over, I noticed large parts of commented 
code. Remove them if they are not useful anymore, makes the files big and hard 
to follow.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-597025761___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-10 Thread sergey-safarov
@mojtabaesfandiari are you looked [`DPDK`](https://www.dpdk.org/) initiative.
This initiative driven by many hardware and software 
[vendors](https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#members).

`DPDK` move packet processing from kernel to network interface card.
`DPDK` allow get network packet processing at 40Gb/s and more speed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-597020191___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-10 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
mojtabaesfandiari commented on this pull request.



> @@ -0,0 +1,1976 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Mojtaba Esfandiari.S, Nasim-Telecom

For cause of compatibilities with other codes in Kamailio, I decided to use 
rtpproxy module,such as naming of functions, parsing URL, SDP, get media 
descriptions and etc. But the process of relaying media is completely 
different. The LREProxy uses PREROUTING in netfilter hooks in Linux networking 
stack.
The LREProxy engine is running pass the last steps of developing, Because it 
needs to use netlink library for interacting between user-pace and 
kernel-space, it took more time. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#discussion_r390188919___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-09 Thread Maksym Sobolyev
sobomax commented on this pull request.



> @@ -0,0 +1,1976 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Mojtaba Esfandiari.S, Nasim-Telecom

>From brief look to it, this is pretty much carboon-copy of the rtpproxy 
>module, as such original (c) line of the code should be reproduced. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#pullrequestreview-371660670___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-09 Thread Maksym Sobolyev
sobomax commented on this pull request.



> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Mojtaba Esfandiari.S, Nasim-Telecom

>From brief look to it, this is pretty much carboon-copy of the rtpproxy 
>module, as such original (c) line of the code should be reproduced. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#pullrequestreview-371660263___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-03-09 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
The kernel module does not have to be published here, but is it open source? If 
yes, is it available somewhere (another github repository or a public portal)?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-596741812___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
I don't publish the lreproxy engine because of quite bit of updating.
No, Actually is a linux kernel module that would be insert to linux module for 
working with this module. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-579465211___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread sergey-safarov
Where I can get source (description) of  `lre proxy server`?
Is ` lre proxy server` fork of [`RTP proxy`](https://www.rtpproxy.org/)?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-579202672___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread sergey-safarov
sergey-safarov commented on this pull request.



> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  
USA
+ *
+ */
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#ifndef __USE_BSD
+#define  __USE_BSD

Is required force define `__USE_BSD` on all systems? Say on Linux.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#pullrequestreview-349301250___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
Sure, It is under developing. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-579196515___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread Victor Seva
there's no doc at all. Please take a look over other modules and provide the 
documentation.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-579194500___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
The lreproxy is a Light-RTP-Engine module for Kamailio project. The lreproxy 
engine have developed based LKM for linux. It uses off-loading technique for 
relaying huge number of RTP. It could be used in ingress nodes in your voip 
network. This module use a customised rtp packet classification that could lead 
to process faster and less consumption resource than other rtp engines.
Basically all packet classifications will done based five-tuple fields in Linux 
kernel while in lreproxy it could be done with customised 2 or 3 tuple of 
packet fields.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208#issuecomment-579192200___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-01-28 Thread mojtabaesfandiari
lreproxy: add new lreproxy module

!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template --

!--
IMPORTANT:
  - for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
  - pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
  - backports to stable branches must be done with git cherry-pick -x 
...
  - code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, 
tls)
  - code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
  - GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
--

 Pre-Submission Checklist
!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the 
checkboxes that apply --
!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING 
guidelines from above--
!-- If youre unsure about any of these, dont hesitate to ask on 
sr-dev mailing list --
- [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, 
...)
- [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook 
files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)

 Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

 Checklist:
!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the 
checkboxes that apply --
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [ ] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue # (replace  with an open issue number)

 Description
!-- Describe your changes in detail --

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208

-- Commit Summary --

  * lreproxy module

-- File Changes --

A src/modules/lreproxy/README.md (1)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.c (1976)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.h (120)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.c (460)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.h (41)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.c (521)
A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.h (70)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.patch
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev