Re: [SR-Users] BYE and TCP
Hello
I got an answer from the VOIP provider.
They claim that we have an error in our port forwarding. Because we
advertise 5071, but traffic comes from another port.
As I understand, it is however impossible for TCP to send all traffic
from just one port.
How is TCP SIP actually supposed to handle a BYE, when the client is
behind NAT.
Med Liberalistiske Hilsner --
Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog
Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49
Den ikke akademiske hjemmeside for liberalismen - www.liberalismen.dk
On 11/4/20 10:00 PM, Kjeld Flarup wrote:
Hello again
I have attached a Capture.
My public IP is 194.255.22.44, and I have a port forward of 5071 in my
router
The Raspberry Pi running the Kamailio is on 192.168.2.9 with an alias
192.168.2.40
My listening is setup like this
listen=127.0.0.1:5071
listen=eth0:5071 advertise 194.255.22.44:5071
alias=194.255.22.44:5071
Kamailio is forwarding an invite from a door phone thus I also rewrite
FROM:
uac_replace_from("sip:"+$dbr(ra=>[0,1])+"@194.255.22.44:5071");
And the failure route to
$fu = "sip:"+$dbr(ra=>[0,0])+"@194.255.22.44:5071";
In the route doing the INVITE I also set this:
set_advertised_address("194.255.22.44:5071");
Regarding tcp_reuse_port, if I set this I get this error, which I
understand is due to the way TCP works.
Nov 4 18:38:41 scantronpbx /usr/sbin/kamailio[15864]: {1 ACK 16191
ACK C2Az-Xm2b0CEPyV5eQuz7yEf9IJo4PyJ} WARNING:
[core/tcp_main.c:1061]: tcp_do_connect(): binding to source address
192.168.2.40:5071 failed: Address already in use [98]
I do have tcp_reuse_port=yes with this capture. But much to my
surprise, the 200 OK from is send to 37148, but the ACK to it comes
from 37150
Med Liberalistiske Hilsner --
Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog
Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49
Den ikke akademiske hjemmeside for liberalismen -www.liberalismen.dk
On 11/4/20 1:59 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi,
I think you are searching for this parameter:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#tcp_reuse_port
It basically tells the kernel not to choose a new port at random for
a new connection, but it will try to reuse the existing port (in your
case 5071).
Thanks,
Carsten
--
Carsten Bock I CTO & Founder
ng-voice GmbH
Trostbrücke 1 I 20457 Hamburg I Germany
T +49 40 524 75 93-40 | M +49 179 2021244 I www.ng-voice.com
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, I added two scripts 1- to create tables 2- Insert some basic data in address table Statement 1 executed and tables created but second .sql file not executed although it showed in logs. What shall I do to insert some basic data? Thanks. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 07:03:04 PM GMT+5, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply. Some times we need to provide Initial Data in some tables so I think we can use something you suggested. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 06:00:23 PM GMT+5, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, if you put the sql to create the table in share/kamailio/mysql/customtable-create.sql then you can run: kamdbctl add-tables customtable This has to be done after the kamdbctl create command. If you plan for long term, also taking in consideration the option to add management of customtable records in the cli, I can recommend to look at kamcli: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli It can also create the customtable using: kamcli db create-tables-group customtable The 'kamcli db' offers what old 'kamdbctl' and 'kamctl db ...' do. But then you can just add your own python file in 'kamcli/commands/cmd_customtable.py' to manage records in that table (for example, you can use cmd_aliasdb.py as a starting point). Cheers, Daniel On 05.11.20 13:40, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks, ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, Thanks for your reply. Some times we need to provide Initial Data in some tables so I think we can use something you suggested. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 06:00:23 PM GMT+5, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, if you put the sql to create the table in share/kamailio/mysql/customtable-create.sql then you can run: kamdbctl add-tables customtable This has to be done after the kamdbctl create command. If you plan for long term, also taking in consideration the option to add management of customtable records in the cli, I can recommend to look at kamcli: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli It can also create the customtable using: kamcli db create-tables-group customtable The 'kamcli db' offers what old 'kamdbctl' and 'kamctl db ...' do. But then you can just add your own python file in 'kamcli/commands/cmd_customtable.py' to manage records in that table (for example, you can use cmd_aliasdb.py as a starting point). Cheers, Daniel On 05.11.20 13:40, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks, ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 186, Issue 5
Hi, Here's an example kamailio.cfg that uses record_route so in-dialog requests will go through the Kamailio proxy: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/etc/kamailio.cfg There are many other example cfg files: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/master/misc/examples Any server that wants to see the in-dialog messages needs to add itself to the record route list when receiving the initial INVITE for example. If a server is not in the list of record routes, then in-dialog requests will not be sent to the server. Headers that are most important in terms of routing are R-URI, Route, Record-Route, Contact, Via. Via header is for routing responses, while Record-Route is for in-dialog requests. Cheers, Yufei > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:26:16 +0200 > From: "Adrian Tabacioiu" > To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > Subject: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration that exit dialog afer INVITE > -> OK > Message-ID: <7449102a9f3dbe38b6dba753d1cffcd8.squir...@mail.c-s.ro> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > Hello all, > > Am I new in the usage of kamailio, sorry if I ask somehow something simple > or terribly wrong . > > I need to test a configuration of Kamailio which exit the dialog between > UA after the first OK (that means it will not receive the following ACK, > BYE). > > I understand that in theory this is possible in two configuration types: > - no Record Route header > - or stateless proxy > > First question: > Am I correct with the choices above? > Can I find example configuration for this two modes ? > > Question 2: > two or more proxy should be inter-connected, removing the Record Route > header would interfere with proxy routing ? (should not the "Via" > information be sufficient?) > > Thank you in advance for help. > > Best regards, > Adrian Tabacioiu > > ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks,___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hello, if you put the sql to create the table in share/kamailio/mysql/customtable-create.sql then you can run: kamdbctl add-tables customtable This has to be done after the kamdbctl create command. If you plan for long term, also taking in consideration the option to add management of customtable records in the cli, I can recommend to look at kamcli: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli It can also create the customtable using: kamcli db create-tables-group customtable The 'kamcli db' offers what old 'kamdbctl' and 'kamctl db ...' do. But then you can just add your own python file in 'kamcli/commands/cmd_customtable.py' to manage records in that table (for example, you can use cmd_aliasdb.py as a starting point). Cheers, Daniel On 05.11.20 13:40, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi, > > I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. > > I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of > > *kamdbctl create* > > command. Currently I am adding my script in > > *share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql* > > Thanks, > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] tsilo - failure to add branches (-1)
Hi Federico,
In my Kamailio "append_branches" was set to 0 long time ago and this was a
legacy that I needed to deal with. After removing "modparam("registrar",
"append_branches", 0)" and fixing config everything worked. Thank you again!
Jurijs
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:51 PM Federico Cabiddu
wrote:
> Good to know that you solved it :)
> Why did you have to set "append_branches" to 0? Which was the behaviour
> when enabling it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Federico
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:51 PM Jurijs Ivolga
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Federico,
>>
>> First of all, thank you a lot for helping me. This means a lot to me
>> This is true open source spirit!!!
>>
>> So indeed I had messed up config and I was saving transactions
>> incorrectly and that why you saw 2 call IDs.
>>
>> I updated my config and now I do save transactions correctly and it
>> works! I would like to add that I needed to update Registrar settings too:
>>
>> modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) -- this was messing with my
>> config too. I needed to disable it to make it work.
>>
>> Thank you again
>>
>> Jurijs
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:55 PM Federico Cabiddu <
>> federico.cabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jurijs,
>>> I had a look at the logs but they are confusing: looks like there are
>>> two calls (transactions) stored by tsilo and the ts_append is called only
>>> for one.
>>> In the logs you sent:
>>> 1) row 19: an INVITE comes with callid
>>> 9741c821-93b2-1239-0599-024233fefdc7
>>> 2) row 60: since there is no contact the transaction is
>>> suspended (transaction hash:id=9467:1575872173)
>>> 3) row 132: a REGISTER is received from the user for which the
>>> transaction was suspended
>>> 4) row 193 onward: the transaction 9467:1575872173 is resumed, the
>>> INVITE is sent out and the transaction stored by tsilo
>>> 5) row 262: another REGISTER from the same instance (same sip.instance
>>> and received) is received
>>> 6) ts_append is called but the transaction hash:id is 16864:783220347
>>> and the callid is 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0: when has
>>> this transaction been stored? I couldn't find anywhere in the logs
>>> Which version of kamailio are you using?
>>> Are you setting the "use_domain" tsilo parameter?
>>> First I'd suggest trying to call ts_store specifying the r-uri, as you
>>> do for ts_append.
>>> Then could you please retry the scenario being sure that there is only
>>> one transaction stored?
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Federico
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 5:16 PM Jurijs Ivolga
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Any ideas regarding "t_append_branches(): failure to add branches (-1)"?
Is there a way somehow to dump what ts_append handover towards tm? I
think if I would be able to see this I will be able to understand what is
wrong. I tried tm:local-request and failure route and branch route, but
these routes are not executed when this error happens.
Maybe the issue is that the TLS connection is established between
Kamailio and UAC what is in front my Register and this Register kamailio
just tries to connect directly towards UAC and it fails? At least this is
my idea why this might fail.
Jurijs
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jurijs Ivolga
wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Indeed I had a messed up config at that point. I cleaned it up, but
> still had the same problem.
>
> Full log in attachment.
>
> Here is some part of it:
>
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tsilo [ts_append.c:72]:
>> ts_append(): transaction 16864:783220347 found for
>> sip:1443452187102-0af7c6035717-0...@voipstaging.myappapp.net, going
>> to append branches
>> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_lookup.c:1612]:
>> t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction found
>> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} registrar [lookup.c:306]:
>> lookup_helper(): contact for [1443452187102-0af7c6035717-0001] found by
>> address
>> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:77]:
>> t_append_branches(): transaction 16864:783220347 in status 180
>> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:99]:
>> t_append_branches(): Call 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0:
>> 1 (0) outgoing branches
>> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm
>> [t_append_branches.c:163]: t_append_branches(): Call
>> 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0: 1 (0) outgoing branches
>> after clear_branches()
>> 45(51) ERROR: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm
>> [t_append_branches.c:172]: *t_append_branches(): failure to add
>> branches (-1)*
>> 45(51) INFO: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro}
Re: [SR-Users] tsilo - failure to add branches (-1)
Good to know that you solved it :)
Why did you have to set "append_branches" to 0? Which was the behaviour
when enabling it?
Cheers,
Federico
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:51 PM Jurijs Ivolga
wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> First of all, thank you a lot for helping me. This means a lot to me
> This is true open source spirit!!!
>
> So indeed I had messed up config and I was saving transactions incorrectly
> and that why you saw 2 call IDs.
>
> I updated my config and now I do save transactions correctly and it works!
> I would like to add that I needed to update Registrar settings too:
>
> modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) -- this was messing with my
> config too. I needed to disable it to make it work.
>
> Thank you again
>
> Jurijs
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:55 PM Federico Cabiddu <
> federico.cabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jurijs,
>> I had a look at the logs but they are confusing: looks like there are two
>> calls (transactions) stored by tsilo and the ts_append is called only for
>> one.
>> In the logs you sent:
>> 1) row 19: an INVITE comes with callid
>> 9741c821-93b2-1239-0599-024233fefdc7
>> 2) row 60: since there is no contact the transaction is
>> suspended (transaction hash:id=9467:1575872173)
>> 3) row 132: a REGISTER is received from the user for which the
>> transaction was suspended
>> 4) row 193 onward: the transaction 9467:1575872173 is resumed, the INVITE
>> is sent out and the transaction stored by tsilo
>> 5) row 262: another REGISTER from the same instance (same sip.instance
>> and received) is received
>> 6) ts_append is called but the transaction hash:id is 16864:783220347 and
>> the callid is 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0: when has this
>> transaction been stored? I couldn't find anywhere in the logs
>> Which version of kamailio are you using?
>> Are you setting the "use_domain" tsilo parameter?
>> First I'd suggest trying to call ts_store specifying the r-uri, as you do
>> for ts_append.
>> Then could you please retry the scenario being sure that there is only
>> one transaction stored?
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Federico
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 5:16 PM Jurijs Ivolga
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any ideas regarding "t_append_branches(): failure to add branches (-1)"?
>>>
>>> Is there a way somehow to dump what ts_append handover towards tm? I
>>> think if I would be able to see this I will be able to understand what is
>>> wrong. I tried tm:local-request and failure route and branch route, but
>>> these routes are not executed when this error happens.
>>>
>>> Maybe the issue is that the TLS connection is established between
>>> Kamailio and UAC what is in front my Register and this Register kamailio
>>> just tries to connect directly towards UAC and it fails? At least this is
>>> my idea why this might fail.
>>>
>>> Jurijs
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:38 AM Jurijs Ivolga
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi Federico,
Indeed I had a messed up config at that point. I cleaned it up, but
still had the same problem.
Full log in attachment.
Here is some part of it:
45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tsilo [ts_append.c:72]:
> ts_append(): transaction 16864:783220347 found for
> sip:1443452187102-0af7c6035717-0...@voipstaging.myappapp.net, going
> to append branches
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_lookup.c:1612]:
> t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction found
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} registrar [lookup.c:306]:
> lookup_helper(): contact for [1443452187102-0af7c6035717-0001] found by
> address
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:77]:
> t_append_branches(): transaction 16864:783220347 in status 180
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:99]:
> t_append_branches(): Call 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0:
> 1 (0) outgoing branches
> 45(51) DEBUG: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:163]:
> t_append_branches(): Call 3ed4a6c3051ea46b50487a0d1b5b25ec@10.10.0.0:
> 1 (0) outgoing branches after clear_branches()
> 45(51) ERROR: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro} tm [t_append_branches.c:172]:
> *t_append_branches():
> failure to add branches (-1)*
> 45(51) INFO: {1 21 REGISTER 6z~FzexPro}
[SR-Users] Proxy configuration that exit dialog afer INVITE -> OK
Hello all, Am I new in the usage of kamailio, sorry if I ask somehow something simple or terribly wrong . I need to test a configuration of Kamailio which exit the dialog between UA after the first OK (that means it will not receive the following ACK, BYE). I understand that in theory this is possible in two configuration types: - no Record Route header - or stateless proxy First question: Am I correct with the choices above? Can I find example configuration for this two modes ? Question 2: two or more proxy should be inter-connected, removing the Record Route header would interfere with proxy routing ? (should not the "Via" information be sufficient?) Thank you in advance for help. Best regards, Adrian Tabacioiu ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
