[SR-Users] Re: replies using the wrong protocol
I replaced IPs, FYI 200 OK from carrier SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TLS KAM_PUB_IP:5061;branch=z9hG4bK18ff.3d856b8b0b007414ab2dec09cbabd574.0;i=a2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS FS_PUB_IP:5061;received=FS_PUB_IP;rport=56403;branch=z9hG4bKKaee61yyZ98De From: "+14388006102" ;tag=XjQ5g4Ze5UaZp To: ;tag=gK04d33797 Call-ID: b99c2b65-a827-123d-1984-4201c0a80193 CSeq: 84807919 INVITE Record-Route: Accept: application/sdp, application/isup, application/dtmf, application/dtmf-relay, multipart/mixed Contact: Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,REGISTER,INFO,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,PRACK,UPDATE,OPTIONS,MESSAGE,PUBLISH Require: timer Supported: timer Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uac Content-Length:324 Content-Disposition: session; handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 913845 351585 IN IP4 CARRIER_PUB_IP s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 206.146.100.22 t=0 0 m=audio 33168 RTP/SAVP 0 101 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:LfSgFSVqhXNWMSziOtwpEeYmNu0/kGiyuMVS8VXy a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=ptime:20 ACK Kam is sending ACK sip:933@CARRIER_PUB_IP:5061 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP KAM_PUB_IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK18ff.f8c56ea9cad44dc10408188224b923cf.0;i=a2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS FS_PUB_IP:5061;received=FS_PUB_IP;rport=56403;branch=z9hG4bKmK767vF2vjZ0S Max-Forwards: 69 From: "+14388006102" ;tag=XjQ5g4Ze5UaZp To: ;tag=gK04d33797 Call-ID: b99c2b65-a827-123d-1984-4201c0a80193 CSeq: 84807919 ACK Contact: Content-Length: 0 __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: replies using the wrong protocol
El Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:54:26 - "sarah.martin--- via sr-users" escribió: > I am extremely new at this, but trying to set up TLS with a carrier. TLS > connection is good, Invite goes out, we get the 100 and the 200, but > subsequent messages (ACK and BYE) are being sent with UDP and I cannot figure > out how to get them to maintain the TLS transport. Any suggestions? I think > this is the section I'm looking for. > What's your contact look like? -- PekePBX, the multitenant PBX solution https://pekepbx.com pgpCXco3udTI4.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] replies using the wrong protocol
I am extremely new at this, but trying to set up TLS with a carrier. TLS
connection is good, Invite goes out, we get the 100 and the 200, but subsequent
messages (ACK and BYE) are being sent with UDP and I cannot figure out how to
get them to maintain the TLS transport. Any suggestions? I think this is the
section I'm looking for.
# Manage incoming replies in transaction context
onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {
xdbg("incoming reply\n");
if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") {
route(NATMANAGE);
}
if (has_body("application/sdp")) {
xdbg("rtpengine_manage loop-protect MANAGE_REPLY");
#rtpengine_manage("loop-protect");
}
}
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Possibility to print values of Core Keywords in Kamailio configuration file
Hello everyone, I have a question regarding the usage of core keywords, specifically the possibility of printing their values in log messages. While I understand that core keywords such as 'dst_port' and 'af' etc... can be accessed directly in if conditions, I am interested to know if there is a way to print the values of these core keywords for logging purposes. Thank you. __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Adding custom headers to HTTP server response xhttp
HI Ihor
I've tried it already, It doesn't append this header in Http response.
KSR.hdr.*append_to_reply*("Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000");
KSR.xhttp.xhttp_reply("200", "Ok", "text/plain", "working");
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 3:12 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Varunan,
>
> Have you tried
> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/textops.html#textops.f.append_to_reply
> before calling * xhttp_reply*?
>
> Cheers,
> Ihor
>
> Le mer. 19 juin 2024 à 08:05, Sasivarunan via sr-users <
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> a écrit :
>
>> HI Team,
>> I use tls and xhttp module to enable websocket interface for webrtc
>> client to connect.
>> I wanted to add "Strict-Transport-Security" header to xhttp response to
>> add security. But currently I don't see a way to add it anywhere.
>>
>> I can see only server_header as an option, But this will get added to
>> SIP messages as well.
>> It 'd be great if anybody has a suggestion around this.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varunan
>> __
>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
>> the sender!
>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ihor (Igor)
> __
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
> the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Adding custom headers to HTTP server response xhttp
Varunan, Have you tried https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/textops.html#textops.f.append_to_reply before calling * xhttp_reply*? Cheers, Ihor Le mer. 19 juin 2024 à 08:05, Sasivarunan via sr-users < sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> a écrit : > HI Team, > I use tls and xhttp module to enable websocket interface for webrtc client > to connect. > I wanted to add "Strict-Transport-Security" header to xhttp response to > add security. But currently I don't see a way to add it anywhere. > > I can see only server_header as an option, But this will get added to SIP > messages as well. > It 'd be great if anybody has a suggestion around this. > > > Thanks > Varunan > __ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to > the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: > -- Best regards, Ihor (Igor) __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: exec concurrency
Hello Jon, the exec module implementation is not particular efficient. It basically creates a pipe to pass the commands to the shell and forks a new process. I would not recommend it you have more then moderate load on your system, and/or need to deal with load spikes. If you need to execute scripts in the Kamailio context, look to the KEMI modules. Otherwise, the asynchronous approach discussed previously is another way. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > -Original Message- > From: Jon Bonilla (Manwe) via sr-users > Sent: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2024 21:09 > To: Brett Nemeroff ; Kamailio (SER) - Users > Mailing List > Cc: Jon Bonilla (Manwe) > Subject: [SR-Users] Re: exec concurrency > > El Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:54:41 -0500 > Brett Nemeroff escribió: > > > Just want to add that exec is heavy and slow. I would not recommend it. > > > > Is there a reason you want to do this over http-ifying your script and > > using async? > > > > > > Not really. The scripts are provided. Maybe I'm against "http all the things" > which seems to be what everyone does nowadays. > Why would http client be lighter than executing a script? That would be a > design problem, right? > > > > > -- > PekePBX, the multitenant PBX solution > https://pekepbx.com __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
