[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
Ah ok, think I misunderstood what you were asking here. You can use the PV $rs in a condition for the 607 (or anything >400 etc) to hit rtpengine_manage() block, just put it in your failure route. The block can be used in any route: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.rtpengine_manage On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:49, Ghulam Mustafa wrote: > I'm wondering how to handle situations where downstream send invalid > messages. In this case, Kamailio is not able to send DELETE commands > to rtpengine due to parsing errors, as a result rtpengine is consuming all > available ports and causing instability in our VoIP infrastructure. Do you > have any suggestions on how to mitigate this issue? > > Regards, > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:40 PM Who AmI wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for >> other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be >> the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - " >> >> The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party >> or >> some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is >>unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly >>rejected >> >> " >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 >> >> Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this >> destination and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John. >> >> On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow >>> >>> >>> >>> U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 >>> INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. >>> Record-Route: >>> . >>> Record-Route: >>> . >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >>> Max-Forwards: 66. >>> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >>> To: . >>> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >>> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >>> Contact: >>> . >>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, >>> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. >>> Supported: timer, path, replaces. >>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. >>> Content-Type: application/sdp. >>> Content-Disposition: session. >>> Content-Length: 329. >>> Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxx" >> >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. >>> User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. >>> P-hint: outbound. >>> . >>> v=0. >>> o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >>> s=NewAgeNetworks. >>> c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >>> t=0 0. >>> m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 >>> >>> U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 >>> 01. >>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. >>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. >>> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. >>> a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. >>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. >>> a=fmtp:101 0-15. >>> a=sendrecv. >>> a=rtcp:32861. >>> a=ptime:20. >>> >>> >>> >>> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 >>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >>> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >>> To: >> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >>> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >>> Contact: . >>> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >>> Server: sbc_5. >>> Content-Length: 0. >>> . >>> >>> >>> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 >>> SIP/2.0 607. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >>> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >>> To: >> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >>> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >>> Contact: . >>> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >>> Server: sbc_5. >>> Content-Length: 0. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI wrote: >>> Hi Mustafa, Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or something at the called end we don't know. Thanks, John. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Hello Kamailio Community, > > I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 > "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: > > May 31 12:32:0
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
RTPEngine will time out a call if it ceases to receive RTP from both endpoints. You can lower this timeout to something much more stringent, and that will help shorten the life cycle of ports. > On May 31, 2024, at 9:49 AM, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users > wrote: > > I'm wondering how to handle situations where downstream send invalid > messages. In this case, Kamailio is not able to send DELETE commands to > rtpengine due to parsing errors, as a result rtpengine is consuming all > available ports and causing instability in our VoIP infrastructure. Do you > have any suggestions on how to mitigate this issue? > Regards, > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:40 PM Who AmI wrote: > Hi, > > Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for other > destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be the answer > here: 607 - Unwanted - "The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on > input from the called party or > some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is > unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly > rejected > " > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 > > Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this destination > and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. > > Thanks, > > John. > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa wrote: > Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow > > > > U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 > INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. > Record-Route: > . > Record-Route: > . > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > Max-Forwards: 66. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: . > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Contact: > . > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, > REFER, NOTIFY. > Supported: timer, path, replaces. > Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. > Content-Type: application/sdp. > Content-Disposition: session. > Content-Length: 329. > Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxx" > ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. > User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. > P-hint: outbound. > . > v=0. > o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > s=NewAgeNetworks. > c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > t=0 0. > m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 > > U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 > 01. > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. > a=fmtp:101 0-15. > a=sendrecv. > a=rtcp:32861. > a=ptime:20. > > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 > SIP/2.0 100 Trying. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: > ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 > SIP/2.0 607. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: > ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > > Regards, > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI wrote: > Hi Mustafa, > > Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in > response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or > something at the called end we don't know. > > Thanks, > > John. > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users > wrote: > Hello Kamailio Community, > I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 > "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: > > May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: > [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed > (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad > message (offset: 11) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg()
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
I'm wondering how to handle situations where downstream send invalid messages. In this case, Kamailio is not able to send DELETE commands to rtpengine due to parsing errors, as a result rtpengine is consuming all available ports and causing instability in our VoIP infrastructure. Do you have any suggestions on how to mitigate this issue? Regards, On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:40 PM Who AmI wrote: > Hi, > > Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for > other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be > the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - " > > The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party > or > some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is >unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly >rejected > > " > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 > > Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this > destination and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. > > Thanks, > > John. > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa wrote: > >> Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow >> >> >> >> U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 >> INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. >> Record-Route: >> . >> Record-Route: >> . >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> Max-Forwards: 66. >> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: . >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Contact: >> . >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. >> Supported: timer, path, replaces. >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. >> Content-Type: application/sdp. >> Content-Disposition: session. >> Content-Length: 329. >> Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxx" > >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. >> User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. >> P-hint: outbound. >> . >> v=0. >> o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >> s=NewAgeNetworks. >> c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >> t=0 0. >> m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 >> >> U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 >> 01. >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. >> a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. >> a=fmtp:101 0-15. >> a=sendrecv. >> a=rtcp:32861. >> a=ptime:20. >> >> >> >> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: > ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> Contact: . >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Server: sbc_5. >> Content-Length: 0. >> . >> >> >> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 >> SIP/2.0 607. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: > ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> Contact: . >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Server: sbc_5. >> Content-Length: 0. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI wrote: >> >>> Hi Mustafa, >>> >>> Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is >>> in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself >>> or something at the called end we don't know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John. >>> >>> On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < >>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: >>> Hello Kamailio Community, I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 11) May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=>>> 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
Hi, Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - " The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party or some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly rejected " https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this destination and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. Thanks, John. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa wrote: > Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow > > > > U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 > INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. > Record-Route: > . > Record-Route: > . > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > Max-Forwards: 66. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: . > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Contact: > . > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. > Supported: timer, path, replaces. > Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. > Content-Type: application/sdp. > Content-Disposition: session. > Content-Length: 329. > Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxx" >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. > User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. > P-hint: outbound. > . > v=0. > o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > s=NewAgeNetworks. > c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > t=0 0. > m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 > > U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 > 01. > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. > a=fmtp:101 0-15. > a=sendrecv. > a=rtcp:32861. > a=ptime:20. > > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 > SIP/2.0 100 Trying. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 > SIP/2.0 607. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > > Regards, > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI wrote: > >> Hi Mustafa, >> >> Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in >> response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or >> something at the called end we don't know. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John. >> >> On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < >> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: >> >>> Hello Kamailio Community, >>> >>> I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 >>> "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: >>> >>> May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: >>> [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed >>> (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) >>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: >>> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad >>> message (offset: 11) >>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: >>> message=>> 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: >>> SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: >>> "15516756486" ;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: >>> ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: >>> a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: >>> #015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: >>> sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> >>> >>> And the actual SIP message is >>>
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
The Response Reason Phrase is missing in status line, see RFC 3261 section 7.2. Hope this helps. -- Muhammad Shahzad Shafi Tel: +49 176 99 83 10 85 On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 2:57 PM Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Hello Kamailio Community, > > I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 > "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: > > May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: > [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed > (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad > message (offset: 11) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: > message= 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: > SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: > "15516756486" ;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: > ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: > a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: > #015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: > sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> > > And the actual SIP message is > > U 36.53.xx.xx:5060 -> 10.x.x.30:5060 #850 > SIP/2.0 607. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKbdbd.95060a558d66b77d258b8d0799be4cf0.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8 > ;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFCaHXyLA3G.SjwaAmdn. > From: "13xx" ;tag=pFFatBpUc75BH. > To: ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C56639_20240531081932874_sbc04. > Call-ID: e0d2f5fa-99ea-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84025194 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > > Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you! > > Mustafa > > __ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to > the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: > __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. Record-Route: . Record-Route: . Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. Max-Forwards: 66. From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. To: . Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. Contact: . Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. Supported: timer, path, replaces. Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session. Content-Length: 329. Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxx" ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. P-hint: outbound. . v=0. o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. s=NewAgeNetworks. c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. t=0 0. m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 01. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=sendrecv. a=rtcp:32861. a=ptime:20. U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 SIP/2.0 100 Trying. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. To: ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. Contact: . CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. Server: sbc_5. Content-Length: 0. . U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 SIP/2.0 607. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. From: "1272xxx" ;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. To: ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. Contact: . CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. Server: sbc_5. Content-Length: 0. Regards, On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI wrote: > Hi Mustafa, > > Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in > response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or > something at the called end we don't know. > > Thanks, > > John. > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > >> Hello Kamailio Community, >> >> I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 >> "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: >> >> May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: >> [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed >> (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) >> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: >> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad >> message (offset: 11) >> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: >> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: >> message=> 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: >> SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: >> "15516756486" ;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: >> ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: >> a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: >> #015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: >> sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> >> >> And the actual SIP message is >> >> U 36.53.xx.xx:5060 -> 10.x.x.30:5060 #850 >> SIP/2.0 607. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060 >> ;branch=z9hG4bKbdbd.95060a558d66b77d258b8d0799be4cf0.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8 >> ;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFCaHXyLA3G.SjwaAmdn. >> From: "13xx" ;tag=pFFatBpUc75BH. >> To: > ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C56639_20240531081932874_sbc04. >> Call-ID: e0d2f5fa-99ea-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> Contact: . >> CSeq: 84025194 INVITE. >> Server: sbc_5. >> Content-Length: 0. >> >> Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Mustafa >> >> __ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep th
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
Hi Mustafa, Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or something at the called end we don't know. Thanks, John. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Hello Kamailio Community, > > I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 > "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: > > May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: > [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed > (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad > message (offset: 11) > May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: > [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: > message= 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: > SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: > "15516756486" ;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: > ;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: > a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: > #015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: > sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> > > And the actual SIP message is > > U 36.53.xx.xx:5060 -> 10.x.x.30:5060 #850 > SIP/2.0 607. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKbdbd.95060a558d66b77d258b8d0799be4cf0.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8 > ;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFCaHXyLA3G.SjwaAmdn. > From: "13xx" ;tag=pFFatBpUc75BH. > To: ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C56639_20240531081932874_sbc04. > Call-ID: e0d2f5fa-99ea-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: . > CSeq: 84025194 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > > Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you! > > Mustafa > > __ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to > the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: > __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
> On May 31, 2024, at 8:39 AM, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users > wrote: > > SIP/2.0 607. Well, that seems clear enough. ;-) -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://evaristesys.com Tel: +1-706-510-6800 __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Parsing Error with SIP 607 Response
Hi Mustafa > SIP/2.0 607. I didn't check the RFC. But doesnt a reply need to be in the format SIP/2.0 XXX AA Is the text missing after the numerical error code? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden __ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch __ __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
