Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:39:32AM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> If RTPEngine is on the same server as Kamailio (Asterisk being on
> another server), and RTP traffic is sent to and from RTPEngine, then
> the provider only needs to whitelist one IP-Address.  I thought with
> RTPEngine that all RTP traffic would go through it and then it would
> pass it on to the correct destination.  Is this correct? 

Yes it is, if you tell kamailio to rewrite SDP by calling rtpengine
functions.

During your previous messages I never got the idea you were talking
about an uplink/provider interconnect (might be me just skimming your
mails). But without a config (of kamailio and rtpengine and a clear
network topology) it is not possible to tell what the problem is.

The standard config in the kamailio repo does NAT checks before calling
rtpengine, if you scrap those conditions it will trigger rtpengine on
all calls. 



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Good morning Daniel,

If RTPEngine is on the same server as Kamailio (Asterisk being on another 
server), and RTP traffic is sent to and from RTPEngine, then the provider only 
needs to whitelist one IP-Address.  I thought with RTPEngine that all RTP 
traffic would go through it and then it would pass it on to the correct 
destination.  Is this correct? 

Thank you

-Original Message-
From: sr-users  On Behalf Of Daniel Tryba
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 4:36 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

MITRE WARNING: Do not open unexpected password-protected attachments.

>>>Email originates from a non-MITRE system. Use caution.<<<

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:05:02PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> The SIP traffic is working this way for me but I still see RTP traffic going 
> directly from Asterisk to the UAC, which means they need to whitelist 
> asterisk IP.  Am I missing something?

In what sense do they need whitelisting? In a common NATed solution where is no 
white/blacklist needed. UA gets RTP endpoints from SDP, starts sending packets 
to ip/port and the destination will send back packets to the source ip/port, 
the router/firewall will just send this to the actual UA. I have yet to find an 
UA that cares about where the RTP stream is coming from with regards to the SIP 
traffic.


___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 04:43:40AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> The expectation that the RTP will come from the same place as the
> signalling does exist in some sclerotic telco interconnects, since big
> brand SBCs would ordinarily meet this need and big brand SBCs are the
> only thing sclerotic telcos understand.

What a lovely word: sclerotic. First time I've ever seen it :)
But yes, in those cases I'm using a combined kamailio/rtpengine
instance. 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Alex Balashov
That's good old sngrep. 

Well, okay, it's not old, it's still the new news. 

https://github.com/irontec/sngrep

--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Kevin Olbrich
Hi,

which debug tool is that in your screenshot?

Thank you very much!

Kevin


Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 18:47 Uhr schrieb Sergiu Pojoga :

> Why would the UAC need to 'whitelist' Asterisk?
>
> Here's an example of an inbound call from Asterisk to a UAC with a sip
> proxy in the middle.
> Notice how the proxy mangles SDP in the 200 OK reply. Media will flow
> directly.
>
> Not saying you shouldn't figure it out how to setup and use rtp proxies,
> just that it's not a must in all scenarios, especially when you have a
> media gateway such as Asterisk listening on a public interface.
>
> [image: image.png]
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:21 PM Wilkins, Steve 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I don’t the UAC to have to whitelist the Asterisk Server.
>>  Everything works great for SIP traffic and I want the same thing for RTP
>> traffic, but I just can’t get rtpengine to work (and I have tried many
>> configurations).
>>
>> *From:* sr-users  * On Behalf Of *Sergiu
>> Pojoga
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:23 AM
>> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there a particular reason why you'd want to involve an rtp proxy in
>> your setup?
>>
>> Considering Asterisk is facing a public interface, media can be set up to
>> flow direct between UACs and Asterisk.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:57 AM Daniel Tryba  wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49:54PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
>> > My offer and answer =>
>> > rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection
>> replace-origin");
>>
>> If this is really your config you should change the offer to answer for
>> the answer part of the config. Either use rtpengine_offer and
>> rtengine_answer in the correct places of simply use rptengine_manage and
>> let the module figure out the right command.
>>
>> I.O.W. you aren't giving any indepth info on your config.
>> ___
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> ___
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Alex Balashov
The expectation that the RTP will come from the same place as the signalling 
does exist in some sclerotic telco interconnects, since big brand SBCs would 
ordinarily meet this need and big brand SBCs are the only thing sclerotic 
telcos understand.

But I agree that it's an exotic and uncommon requirement, certainly not 
applicable to anything like end-user UAs or ordinary business SIP devices. 

--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Tryba 
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" 
Sent: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:05:02PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> The SIP traffic is working this way for me but I still see RTP traffic going 
> directly from Asterisk to the UAC, which means they need to whitelist 
> asterisk IP.  Am I missing something?

In what sense do they need whitelisting? In a common NATed solution
where is no white/blacklist needed. UA gets RTP endpoints from SDP,
starts sending packets to ip/port and the destination will send back
packets to the source ip/port, the router/firewall will just send this
to the actual UA. I have yet to find an UA that cares about where the
RTP stream is coming from with regards to the SIP traffic.

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:05:02PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> The SIP traffic is working this way for me but I still see RTP traffic going 
> directly from Asterisk to the UAC, which means they need to whitelist 
> asterisk IP.  Am I missing something?

In what sense do they need whitelisting? In a common NATed solution
where is no white/blacklist needed. UA gets RTP endpoints from SDP,
starts sending packets to ip/port and the destination will send back
packets to the source ip/port, the router/firewall will just send this
to the actual UA. I have yet to find an UA that cares about where the
RTP stream is coming from with regards to the SIP traffic.



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Sergiu Pojoga
Why would the UAC need to 'whitelist' Asterisk?

Here's an example of an inbound call from Asterisk to a UAC with a sip
proxy in the middle.
Notice how the proxy mangles SDP in the 200 OK reply. Media will flow
directly.

Not saying you shouldn't figure it out how to setup and use rtp proxies,
just that it's not a must in all scenarios, especially when you have a
media gateway such as Asterisk listening on a public interface.

[image: image.png]


On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:21 PM Wilkins, Steve  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> Yes, I don’t the UAC to have to whitelist the Asterisk Server.
>  Everything works great for SIP traffic and I want the same thing for RTP
> traffic, but I just can’t get rtpengine to work (and I have tried many
> configurations).
>
> *From:* sr-users  * On Behalf Of *Sergiu
> Pojoga
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:23 AM
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine
>
>
>
> Is there a particular reason why you'd want to involve an rtp proxy in
> your setup?
>
> Considering Asterisk is facing a public interface, media can be set up to
> flow direct between UACs and Asterisk.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:57 AM Daniel Tryba  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49:54PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> > My offer and answer =>
> > rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection
> replace-origin");
>
> If this is really your config you should change the offer to answer for
> the answer part of the config. Either use rtpengine_offer and
> rtengine_answer in the correct places of simply use rptengine_manage and
> let the module figure out the right command.
>
> I.O.W. you aren't giving any indepth info on your config.
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Hello,

Yes, I don’t the UAC to have to whitelist the Asterisk Server.   Everything 
works great for SIP traffic and I want the same thing for RTP traffic, but I 
just can’t get rtpengine to work (and I have tried many configurations).
From: sr-users  On Behalf Of Sergiu Pojoga
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:23 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Is there a particular reason why you'd want to involve an rtp proxy in your 
setup?
Considering Asterisk is facing a public interface, media can be set up to flow 
direct between UACs and Asterisk.


On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:57 AM Daniel Tryba 
mailto:d.tr...@pocos.nl>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49:54PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> My offer and answer =>
> rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

If this is really your config you should change the offer to answer for
the answer part of the config. Either use rtpengine_offer and
rtengine_answer in the correct places of simply use rptengine_manage and
let the module figure out the right command.

I.O.W. you aren't giving any indepth info on your config.
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Sergiu Pojoga
Is there a particular reason why you'd want to involve an rtp proxy in your
setup?
Considering Asterisk is facing a public interface, media can be set up to
flow direct between UACs and Asterisk.


On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:57 AM Daniel Tryba  wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49:54PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> > My offer and answer =>
> > rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection
> replace-origin");
>
> If this is really your config you should change the offer to answer for
> the answer part of the config. Either use rtpengine_offer and
> rtengine_answer in the correct places of simply use rptengine_manage and
> let the module figure out the right command.
>
> I.O.W. you aren't giving any indepth info on your config.
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49:54PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
> My offer and answer =>
> rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

If this is really your config you should change the offer to answer for
the answer part of the config. Either use rtpengine_offer and
rtengine_answer in the correct places of simply use rptengine_manage and
let the module figure out the right command.

I.O.W. you aren't giving any indepth info on your config.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Wilkins, Steve
I was attempting to log to local1 => rtpengine --interface 
172.21.1.108\!34.226.187.61 --listen-ng 127.0.0.1:12221 --dtls-passive -f -m 
1 -M 2  -E -L 7 --log-facility=local1.  However, even after adding 
"local1.*/var/log/rtpengine.log" to /etc/rsyslog.conf and 
restarting rsyslog, I get no logs.  I am on Cento7.  I do this for Kamailio and 
logging works.

Thank you for your response,
-Steve

From: sr-users  On Behalf Of Richard Fuchs
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:57 AM
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

It may be more helpful to post some logs from rtpengine. You should never see 
"Call-ID not found" from an offer.

Cheers

On 2018-08-22 08:49, Wilkins, Steve wrote:
Here is my start up =>
rtpengine --interface 111.121.22.11\!27.22.132.10 --listen-ng 127.0.0.1:12221 
--dtls-passive -f -m 1 -M 2  -E -L 7 --log-facility=local1

My offer and answer =>
rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

From: sr-users 
<mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org>
 On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:43 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Hello all,

I can't seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I have 
decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it works the best. 
I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I make calls, I see RTPEngine 
being hit but I continually get the error "Call-ID not found", calls work but 
media traffic doesn't go through RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of 
the flags but I seem to always get the same error.When I look at the 
tcpdump log, I see that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there 
a common mis-configuration error that can cause this?

I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to try and 
resolve this as a learning experience.

Thanks all,
-Steve




___

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>

https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Yes I do.

From: sr-users  On Behalf Of Nicolas Breuer
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:55 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Do you load the module ?


De : sr-users 
mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org>>
 De la part de Wilkins, Steve
Envoyé : mercredi 22 août 2018 14:50
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Here is my start up =>
rtpengine --interface 111.121.22.11\!27.22.132.10 --listen-ng 127.0.0.1:12221 
--dtls-passive -f -m 1 -M 2  -E -L 7 --log-facility=local1

My offer and answer =>
rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

From: sr-users 
mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org>>
 On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:43 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
Subject: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Hello all,

I can't seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I have 
decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it works the best. 
I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I make calls, I see RTPEngine 
being hit but I continually get the error "Call-ID not found", calls work but 
media traffic doesn't go through RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of 
the flags but I seem to always get the same error.When I look at the 
tcpdump log, I see that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there 
a common mis-configuration error that can cause this?

I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to try and 
resolve this as a learning experience.

Thanks all,
-Steve
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Richard Fuchs
It may be more helpful to post some logs from rtpengine. You should 
never see "*Call-ID not found*" from an offer.


Cheers

On 2018-08-22 08:49, Wilkins, Steve wrote:


Here is my start up =>

rtpengine --interface 111.121.22.11\!27.22.132.10 --listen-ng 
127.0.0.1:12221 --dtls-passive -f -m 1 -M 2  -E -L 7 
--log-facility=local1


My offer and answer =>

rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection 
replace-origin");


*From:* sr-users  *On Behalf Of 
*Wilkins, Steve

*Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:43 AM
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
*Subject:* [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Hello all,

I can’t seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I 
have decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it 
works the best. I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I 
make calls, I see RTPEngine being hit but I continually get the error 
“*Call-ID not found*”, calls work but media traffic doesn’t go through 
RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of the flags but I seem to 
always get the same error.    When I look at the tcpdump log, I see 
that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there a common 
mis-configuration error that can cause this?


I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to 
try and resolve this as a learning experience.


Thanks all,

-Steve



___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Nicolas Breuer
Do you load the module ?


De : sr-users  De la part de Wilkins, Steve
Envoyé : mercredi 22 août 2018 14:50
À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Here is my start up =>
rtpengine --interface 111.121.22.11\!27.22.132.10 --listen-ng 127.0.0.1:12221 
--dtls-passive -f -m 1 -M 2  -E -L 7 --log-facility=local1

My offer and answer =>
rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

From: sr-users 
mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org>>
 On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:43 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
Subject: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Hello all,

I can't seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I have 
decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it works the best. 
I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I make calls, I see RTPEngine 
being hit but I continually get the error "Call-ID not found", calls work but 
media traffic doesn't go through RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of 
the flags but I seem to always get the same error.When I look at the 
tcpdump log, I see that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there 
a common mis-configuration error that can cause this?

I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to try and 
resolve this as a learning experience.

Thanks all,
-Steve
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Here is my start up =>
rtpengine --interface 111.121.22.11\!27.22.132.10 --listen-ng 127.0.0.1:12221 
--dtls-passive -f -m 1 -M 2  -E -L 7 --log-facility=local1

My offer and answer =>
rtpengine_offer("trust-address replace-session-connection replace-origin");

From: sr-users  On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 8:43 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List 
Subject: [SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

Hello all,

I can't seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I have 
decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it works the best. 
I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I make calls, I see RTPEngine 
being hit but I continually get the error "Call-ID not found", calls work but 
media traffic doesn't go through RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of 
the flags but I seem to always get the same error.When I look at the 
tcpdump log, I see that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there 
a common mis-configuration error that can cause this?

I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to try and 
resolve this as a learning experience.

Thanks all,
-Steve
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Struggling with RTPProxy and RTPEngine

2018-08-22 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Hello all,

I can't seem to get either RTPProxy or RTPEngine to work correctly.  I have 
decided to concentrate on RTPEngine because I have read that it works the best. 
I am using Asterisk with Kamailio in front.  When I make calls, I see RTPEngine 
being hit but I continually get the error "Call-ID not found", calls work but 
media traffic doesn't go through RTPEngine.  I have tried many combination of 
the flags but I seem to always get the same error.When I look at the 
tcpdump log, I see that the media offer is not on the RTPEngine port. Is there 
a common mis-configuration error that can cause this?

I know I can send all my logs and configurations but I really want to try and 
resolve this as a learning experience.

Thanks all,
-Steve
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users