[SR-Users] "kamctl fifo debug" does not work
root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug DEBUG:: 2 root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug 0 DEBUG:: 0 Mar 9 11:04:23 pbx-kam-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[4548]: INFO: [cfg/cfg_ctx.c:411]: INFO: cfg_set_now(): core.debug has been changed to 0 but: root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug DEBUG:: 2 Is this a bug? regards Klaus ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] "kamctl fifo debug" does not work
Am 09.03.2011 12:18, schrieb Klaus Darilion: > root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug > DEBUG:: 2 > > root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug 0 > DEBUG:: 0 > > Mar 9 11:04:23 pbx-kam-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[4548]: INFO: > [cfg/cfg_ctx.c:411]: INFO: cfg_set_now(): core.debug has been changed to 0 > > but: > > root@pbx-kam-1:/home/klaus3000# kamctl fifo debug > DEBUG:: 2 > > > Is this a bug? Seems like, although the start-up value is reported, the debug value is changed for worker childs, but not for dedicated timer processes. regards klaus ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Question about LCR
There is nothing wrong with the carriers, so I wouldn't want to mark them. Just no route to destination type scenario. I like daniels option with the drop on_branch. Only challenge I have is keeping a list of all the flags I have already tried. Say I have five carrier groups and I set the flags in gw to 1 2 3 4 or 5 respectivley. How could I use an AVP to efficiently keep a running list and then check against that list? Thanks! On Mar 8, 2011 9:02 PM, "Juha Heinanen" wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> > The issue I am running into is that in a scenario where >> > both my carriers respond with a 5XX, I end up presenting the same call to >> > all 4 gateways. I would like to present the call to one gateway on each >> > carrier and not try the same carriers second gateway for the same >> > call. > > currently only lcr rule can be a stopper rule, i.e., if it matches, > other matching rules are not tried. > > you can disable a failing gateway for some number of seconds, which > should reduce unsuccessful attempts. > > -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy)
Dear All, I wonder if Kamailio supports RFC5626 as edge proxy or outbound proxy. That is, Edge Proxy adds a Path header with a flow token and includes the "ob" parameter when Processing Register Requests. Eg: Path: If does, how can I config it in kamailio.cfg. At present, Kamailio can only forward register msg to sip server and reply 200 OK to SIP UA with "require: outbound" when register accepted. No "Path" and "ob" added in the msg forwarded to SIP server. You answer is appreciated!! Sincerely, Derrick ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy)
The nat_traversal module has a keep-alive mechanism that can be used to keep connections active on proxy servers. Also, using the textops module, new headers can be added an existing headers can be modified. I haven't read the whole rfc to give you definite answer, but it may be possible to emulate an edge server with a well crafted config. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Derrick Ding wrote: > Dear All, > > > > I wonder if Kamailio supports RFC5626 as edge proxy or outbound proxy. > > That is, > > > > Edge Proxy adds a Path header with a flow token > > and includes the "ob" parameter when Processing Register Requests. > > > > Eg: > > Path: > > > > If does, how can I config it in kamailio.cfg. At present, Kamailio can only > forward register msg to sip server and reply 200 OK to SIP UA with “require: > outbound” when register accepted. No “Path” and “ob” added in the msg > forwarded to SIP server. > > > > You answer is appreciated!! > > > > Sincerely, > > Derrick > > ___ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy)
Hi Derrick, > Edge Proxy adds a Path header with a flow token >and includes the "ob" parameter when Processing Register Requests. > > Eg: >Path: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/path.html and http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/registrar.html#id2954403 (and the two following params) might be sufficient if you're just interested in traversing NAT via kamailio acting as a load-balancer. It's an implementation of RFC3327, see http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/2006-March/002142.html for a real-world example. It won't handle the "ob" header and various keep-alive mechanisms proposed in RFC5626 though, but probably you can solve this with the nat-ping features of nathelper or nat_traversal modules anyways? Andreas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy)
Hi Andreas and Ovidiu Thanks for your reply, I will learn it. I am the beginner of Kamalio from this week. Now I can make kamalio work as an proxy between UA and Asterisk Sip server. I have some basic problem for outgoing call. I will create another topic for that. And hope you will help. :-) Thanks a again Derrick -Original Message- From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Granig Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:00 PM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Does Kamailio support RFC5626 as Edge Proxy(or outbound proxy) Hi Derrick, > Edge Proxy adds a Path header with a flow token >and includes the "ob" parameter when Processing Register Requests. > > Eg: >Path: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/path.html and http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/registrar.html#id29544 03 (and the two following params) might be sufficient if you're just interested in traversing NAT via kamailio acting as a load-balancer. It's an implementation of RFC3327, see http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/2006-March/002142.html for a real-world example. It won't handle the "ob" header and various keep-alive mechanisms proposed in RFC5626 though, but probably you can solve this with the nat-ping features of nathelper or nat_traversal modules anyways? Andreas ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
