[SR-Users] Need help with Kamailio+RLS configuration.

2013-03-28 Thread Aleksandrs Semenenko
Hello everyone,

I am running Kamailio 3.3.2 server and I need to configure it to support RLS to 
avoid big amounts of SUBSCRIBE requests from clients.

By this moment I have managed to configure XCAP server and learned the XML 
structure for press-rules, rls-services and resource-list documents.

Also I have successfully put rls_update_subs and rls_handle_subscribe calls to 
kamailio.cfg, so now when I PUT new rls-services or resource-list document to 
XCAP I can see these calls triggered.

The problem is that on client side I always get empty notification XML:

?xml version=1.0?
list uri=sip:user1-list@sip.server xmlns=urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi 
version=1 fullState=true
  resource uri=sip:user2@sip.server/
  resource uri=sip:user3@sip.server/
/list

As I understand, user2 and user3 must have added user1 to pres-rules document? 
Correct? So it is…

I assume there should be a call to rls_handle_notify function somewhere in 
kamailio.cfg, but where exactly?

I have tried to add it after SUBSCRIBE condition, but it is never called in 
fact:

if( is_method(SUBSCRIBE))
{
xlog(BEFORE rls_handle_subscribe);
$var(ret_code)= rls_handle_subscribe();
xlog(AFTER rls_handle_subscribe);

if($var(ret_code)== 10)
handle_subscribe();

t_release();
}
else 
if (is_method(NOTIFY)) {
xlog(BEFORE rls_handle_notify);
rls_handle_notify();
xlog(AFTER rls_handle_notify);
}


Any comment would be appreciated!

Regards,
Alex.



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] IPv4 / v6 request to global parameter TOS

2013-03-28 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello,

there is a patch attempting to set the tos for IPv6:
- 
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=084be456bc0fab015cf9964ac85651fa60ea77c9


For now is only for UDP, but if it works I will propagate to tcp/tls.

I tested it compiles, but had no IPv6 testbed around. If anyone can test 
and report back, will be appreciated.


Cheers,
Daniel

On 3/25/13 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Hello,

On 3/22/13 9:50 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:

Hello list,

in a bridging scenario with kamailio 3.3.4 and rtpproxy 1.2.1 for 
bridging signalling and media from an IPv4 to an IPv6 network and 
vice versa I found that the TOS value, which is set in kamailio.cfg, 
is used for IPv4 packets only. IPv6 packets have the traffic class 
value set to the default value 0x0. In other words: kamailio doesn´t 
use this variable for IPv6 packets. In the cookbook 
(http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/3.3.x/core#tos) I haven´t 
found any hint that it _is_ limited to IPv4 only (...for the sent IP 
packages).


I know that the name tos may be misleading, as the original 
definition was outdated by dscp+ecn, but it was/is working fine now. 
However, as IPv6 is using dscp+ecn, too, I wonder if the tos variable 
should support IPv6 packets, too.


Could anybody give me a hint? Is there maybe an alternative way to 
prioritise SIP in IPv6 with kamailio?
Probably when it was added the IPv6 was no longer in the spot and 
developer didn't bother with it. If it uses more or less same 
interface to set it, then I guess it will not be hard to extend it to 
IPv6. Just add it to the tracker to be visible and not to get forgotten.


Cheers,
Daniel



--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
 - http://conference.kamailio.com -


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] base64 transformation

2013-03-28 Thread Andreas Granig

Hi guys

Maybe I missed something, but looks like there is no base64 
encode/decode transformation in PV, right?
I think we're going to add one, as it might be handy to do such 
transformations directly from within the config file.


One case where this could be used is that some UAs are picky in regards 
to URIs as URI params, e.g.


P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x='sip:1.2.3.4:1234'

which could be changed into

P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x=c2lwOjEuMi4zLjQ6MTIzNAo=

which might be understood more easily (although it's still just a 
work-around for broken UAs, but that's how life is).


Any objections against such a transformation?

Andreas

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] base64 transformation

2013-03-28 Thread Alex Balashov
I'm all in favour of it, as it would be quite useful to us likewise! 

Andreas Granig agra...@sipwise.com wrote:

Hi guys

Maybe I missed something, but looks like there is no base64 
encode/decode transformation in PV, right?
I think we're going to add one, as it might be handy to do such 
transformations directly from within the config file.

One case where this could be used is that some UAs are picky in regards

to URIs as URI params, e.g.

P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x='sip:1.2.3.4:1234'

which could be changed into

P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x=c2lwOjEuMi4zLjQ6MTIzNAo=

which might be understood more easily (although it's still just a 
work-around for broken UAs, but that's how life is).

Any objections against such a transformation?

Andreas

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a 
fully-fledged keyboard. 

Alex Balashov - Principal 
Evariste Systems LLC 
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave 
Suite 106 
Decatur, GA 30030 
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

2013-03-28 Thread Grant Bagdasarian
Hello,

Is there a maximum length/size defined for the From and To Tag?
The RFC states: it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random with 
at least 32 bits of randomness.
Though I can't find anything in the RFC about the maximum.

The sip_capture table stores the to_tag and from_tag in a varchar(64). Does 
this mean the max is 64?
Source: https://code.google.com/p/homer/source/browse/sql/create_sipcapture.sql

Thanks,

G
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Kuthan

On 3/28/13 11:21 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:

Hello,

Is there a maximum length/size defined for the From and To Tag?

The RFC states: “it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random with 
at least 32 bits of randomness”.

Though I can’t find anything in the RFC about the maximum.

The sip_capture table stores the to_tag and from_tag in a varchar(64). Does 
this mean the max is 64?

Source: https://code.google.com/p/homer/source/browse/sql/create_sipcapture.sql


Yes, that's an implementation's limitation.

-jiri

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

2013-03-28 Thread Grant Bagdasarian
Do you mean implementation in the context of Kamailio's implementation of 
SIP? If so, what if certain SIP clients implement it in a different way and 
their Tag values exceed this limitation? 

-Original Message-
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:j...@iptel.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Cc: Grant Bagdasarian
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

On 3/28/13 11:21 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
 Hello,

 Is there a maximum length/size defined for the From and To Tag?

 The RFC states: “it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random with 
 at least 32 bits of randomness”.

 Though I can’t find anything in the RFC about the maximum.

 The sip_capture table stores the to_tag and from_tag in a varchar(64). Does 
 this mean the max is 64?

 Source: 
 https://code.google.com/p/homer/source/browse/sql/create_sipcapture.sql

Yes, that's an implementation's limitation.

-jiri
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Kuthan


On 3/28/13 12:41 PM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:

Do you mean implementation in the context of Kamailio's implementation of SIP?


yes


If so, what if certain SIP clients implement it in a different way and their 
Tag values exceed this limitation?


that depends on the application how a loss of bits affects it. With the 
required level of entropy,
the impact is probably not big within a module: good enough for say correlation.

it would be more problematic if the sip_capture module tried to work with some 
other module
and match the tags between them -- that would obviously fail.

if you wanted to be more deterministic with the sip_capture module and mysql 
data model,
you would probably have to change data types to TEXT (256 bytes) or BLOB (64k). 
While
these sizes are not prohibited by the spec, MTU constraints and fragmentation 
would
anihilate INVITEs with such Tags anyhow. Also these types have some performance 
penalties
associated with them.

so in summary -- it appears that while somehow esthetically suboptimal, the 64 
bytes limit is
mostly good enough.


jiri



-Original Message-
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:j...@iptel.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Cc: Grant Bagdasarian
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Tag maximum size/length

On 3/28/13 11:21 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:

Hello,

Is there a maximum length/size defined for the From and To Tag?

The RFC states: “it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random with 
at least 32 bits of randomness”.

Though I can’t find anything in the RFC about the maximum.

The sip_capture table stores the to_tag and from_tag in a varchar(64). Does 
this mean the max is 64?

Source: https://code.google.com/p/homer/source/browse/sql/create_sipcapture.sql


Yes, that's an implementation's limitation.

-jiri



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] kamailio 4.0.0; km_append_branch problem

2013-03-28 Thread Pavel Miskov
Hi all,

I installed Kamailio 4.0.0 from source an tried configuration from
Kamailio 3.3.2. problem is with km_append_branch function.

Not starting Kamailio400: invalid configuration file!
-e
 0(20346) ERROR: core [cfg.y:3431]: cfg. parser: failed to find
command km_append_branch
 0(20346) : core [cfg.y:3570]: parse error in config file
/usr/local/kamailio400/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 2448, column
22: unknown command, missing loadmodule?

ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)

configuration:
--
mpath=/usr/local/kamailio400/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/local/kamailio400/lib64/kamailio/modules/
loadmodule kex.so

...
km_append_branch();
route(RELAY);
exit;
}
...

Please advise

Best regards

Pavel

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Homer / Kamailio / Freeswitch

2013-03-28 Thread Antonio Teixeira

Hello.

First of all i just did a fresh install of Homer and this thing is 
perfect only really missing the RTP analysis.
Anyway I have a Freeswitch PBX with several internal profiles and also 
external profiles binded into external Ips ( Public not Private).


Capture on the private network profiles works flawlessly when i try to 
track public interface , calls going into the VOIP Operators , there are 
no entries 


So :

Public call data inside the DB , No

Freeswitch sending data into Kamailio , Yes

TCPDUMP on Kamailio Shows SIP Data from the PBX  Interface , Yes ,

Kamailio complains with
Mar 28 08:30:27 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23709]: ERROR: core 
[parser/msg_parser.c:705]: ERROR: parse_msg: message=#015#012
Mar 28 08:30:27 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23709]: ERROR: core 
[receive.c:146]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed


Problem Scenario :

A call from a phone inside the network 1.1.1.0 Into the PBX 1.1.1.1 is 
tracked by Homer a call from the external IP Binded into the PBX lets 
say something like 80.0.80.8(External Public IP) , Call not tracked and 
Kamailio complains with parse_msg_error.


Helper Data :

Uname
Linux debian 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 25 00:26:11 UTC 2013 x86_64 
GNU/Linux


LSB
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.7 (squeeze)
Release:6.0.7
Codename:   squeeze

Kamailio as of TODAY  from GIT
Homer as of TODAY from GIT
WebHomer 3.3.1 From GIT Also

Using the SOFIA SIPTRACE , problem shows both using the global sip trace 
or individual profile siptrace.


Thanks for your time
Antonio

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Homer / Kamailio / Freeswitch

2013-03-28 Thread Alexandr Dubovikov
Hi,

can you show your sofia's config ?

btw, better send this question to homer's list.

Wbr,
Alexandr

-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Antonio Teixeira
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:37 PM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: [SR-Users] Homer / Kamailio / Freeswitch

Hello.

First of all i just did a fresh install of Homer and this thing is perfect
only really missing the RTP analysis.
Anyway I have a Freeswitch PBX with several internal profiles and also
external profiles binded into external Ips ( Public not Private).

Capture on the private network profiles works flawlessly when i try to track
public interface , calls going into the VOIP Operators , there are no
entries 

So :

Public call data inside the DB , No

Freeswitch sending data into Kamailio , Yes

TCPDUMP on Kamailio Shows SIP Data from the PBX  Interface , Yes ,

Kamailio complains with
Mar 28 08:30:27 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23709]: ERROR: core
[parser/msg_parser.c:705]: ERROR: parse_msg: message=#015#012 Mar 28
08:30:27 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23709]: ERROR: core
[receive.c:146]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed

Problem Scenario :

A call from a phone inside the network 1.1.1.0 Into the PBX 1.1.1.1 is
tracked by Homer a call from the external IP Binded into the PBX lets say
something like 80.0.80.8(External Public IP) , Call not tracked and Kamailio
complains with parse_msg_error.

Helper Data :

Uname
Linux debian 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 25 00:26:11 UTC 2013 x86_64
GNU/Linux

LSB
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.7 (squeeze)
Release:6.0.7
Codename:   squeeze

Kamailio as of TODAY  from GIT
Homer as of TODAY from GIT
WebHomer 3.3.1 From GIT Also

Using the SOFIA SIPTRACE , problem shows both using the global sip trace or
individual profile siptrace.

Thanks for your time
Antonio

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] base64 transformation

2013-03-28 Thread Skyler

+1 for me too. Great idea.

Skyler

On 3/28/2013 3:06 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:

I'm all in favour of it, as it would be quite useful to us likewise!

Andreas Granig agra...@sipwise.com wrote:


Hi guys

Maybe I missed something, but looks like there is no base64
encode/decode transformation in PV, right?
I think we're going to add one, as it might be handy to do such
transformations directly from within the config file.

One case where this could be used is that some UAs are picky in regards

to URIs as URI params, e.g.

P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x='sip:1.2.3.4:1234'

which could be changed into

P-Foo: sip:al...@example.org;x=c2lwOjEuMi4zLjQ6MTIzNAo=

which might be understood more easily (although it's still just a
work-around for broken UAs, but that's how life is).

Any objections against such a transformation?

Andreas

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Help with SIP over Websocket audio call

2013-03-28 Thread Brad Johns
Hi,

New to Kamailio.  I have my Kamailio 4.0 server with websocket support, and
the users can register using the JsSIP Tryit sample WebRTC application.

However, after registration, the users can't place an audio call.  I see no
ringing on the remote browser.  I don't know how to debug this further to
find out what the problem is.  Can anyone help with clues or debug?  In
Debug log I can see the websocket ws_frame.c decode the websocket message
into SIP, and I see normal SIP call flow for an INVITE.  However, nothing
indicating a call.

With this JsSIP, I can do chat through Kamailio SIP over WebSockets.

With this Kamailio server, SIP User Agent Clients work just fine to
register and place SIP call with audio.

It's just that WebRTC audio calls don't work with JsSIP sample application
with Kamailio 4.0 websocket module.

Kamailio websocket configuration borrowed from:

https://gist.github.com/jesusprubio/4066845

Any help debugging this appreciated.
Brad
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Iimitations of xcap server in kamailio

2013-03-28 Thread David Thomson
Has anyone else noticed issues when adding a large number of contacts to your 
buddy list?  I was using Jitsi and at about 40 contacts I was encountering 
issues in that the subsequent contacts would not get added to my buddy list. 

Ttyl,
Dave



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Help with SIP over Websocket audio call: 405 Method Not Allowed

2013-03-28 Thread Brad Johns
Hi,

New to Kamailio.  I have my Kamailio 4.0 server with websocket support, and
the users can register using the JsSIP Tryit sample WebRTC application.
 They can do 'chat' feature of JsSIP Tryit using kamailio 4.0 sip over
websockets module.

However, after registration, the users can't place an audio call.  I see no
ringing on the remote browser.  Can anyone help with clues or debug?  In
Debug log I can see the websocket ws_frame.c decode the websocket message
into SIP, and I see normal SIP call flow for an INVITE.  However, nothing
indicating a call.

I ran 'ngrep -p -w -W byline port ' (WS port) and see that I'm getting
an error response to browser UA of 405:  Method Not Allowed.  I've
isolated it down to the this snippet in the kamailio.cfg for
route[LOCATION]:

$avp(oexten) = $rU;
if (!lookup(location)) {
$var(rc) = $rc;
route(TOVOICEMAIL);
t_newtran();
switch ($var(rc)) {
case -1:
case -3:
send_reply(404, Not Found);
exit;
case -2:
send_reply(405, TEST:  Method Not
Allowed);
exit;
}
}


The switch case is returning -2, for some reason.

Any help in debugging this appreciated.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Iimitations of xcap server in kamailio

2013-03-28 Thread Peter Dunkley
There are a number of core parameter and modparam values you need to
increase from their defaults in order to be able to handle large HTTP
requests (and therefore large XCAP documents).

For example,
* tcp_rd_buf_size (core parameter)
* tcp_wq_max (core parameter)
* sql_buffer_size (core parameter)
* buf_size (xcap_server modparam)

Regards,

Peter

 Has anyone else noticed issues when adding a large number of contacts to
 your buddy list?  I was using Jitsi and at about 40 contacts I was
 encountering issues in that the subsequent contacts would not get added to
 my buddy list.

 Ttyl,
 Dave



 ___
 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
 sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users



-- 
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] Help with SIP over Websocket audio call: 405 Method Not Allowed

2013-03-28 Thread Peter Dunkley
Hello,

In SIP you can put an Allow: header in REGISTER requests to say which
methods the registering end-point is capable of receiving.

If you get a -2 returned from lookup() it means that the method for the
request (in this case INVITE) was not in the Allow: header in the
REGISTER.

You can check this by looking at the REGISTER request in a trace and by
inspecting the location records stored in Kamailio (use the ul.dump
command in kamctl for this).

You can disable method filtering in the Kamailio registrar module by
ensuring that the method_filtering modparam is set to 0 (or just not set
at all as disabled is the default).  Doing this should prevent lookup()
ever returning -2.

Regards,

Peter


 Hi,

 New to Kamailio.  I have my Kamailio 4.0 server with websocket support,
 and
 the users can register using the JsSIP Tryit sample WebRTC application.
  They can do 'chat' feature of JsSIP Tryit using kamailio 4.0 sip over
 websockets module.

 However, after registration, the users can't place an audio call.  I see
 no
 ringing on the remote browser.  Can anyone help with clues or debug?  In
 Debug log I can see the websocket ws_frame.c decode the websocket message
 into SIP, and I see normal SIP call flow for an INVITE.  However, nothing
 indicating a call.

 I ran 'ngrep -p -w -W byline port ' (WS port) and see that I'm getting
 an error response to browser UA of 405:  Method Not Allowed.  I've
 isolated it down to the this snippet in the kamailio.cfg for
 route[LOCATION]:

 $avp(oexten) = $rU;
 if (!lookup(location)) {
 $var(rc) = $rc;
 route(TOVOICEMAIL);
 t_newtran();
 switch ($var(rc)) {
 case -1:
 case -3:
 send_reply(404, Not Found);
 exit;
 case -2:
 send_reply(405, TEST:  Method Not
 Allowed);
 exit;
 }
 }


 The switch case is returning -2, for some reason.

 Any help in debugging this appreciated.
 ___
 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
 sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users



-- 
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users