Re: [SR-Users] sipp and stateful transaction problem

2010-05-25 Thread JR Richardson
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 On 5/22/10 2:22 AM, JR Richardson wrote:

 On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 mico...@gmail.com  wrote:


 Hello,

 On 5/21/10 10:47 PM, JR Richardson wrote:


 Hi All,

 I'm doing some testing with kamailio 1.5:

 kamailio1:/etc/kamailio# kamailio -V
 version: kamailio 1.5.4-notls (i386/linux)
 flags: STATISTICS, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
 SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
 ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, PKG_SIZE 4194304
 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
 svnrevision: 2:6005M
 @(#) $Id: main.c 5608 2009-02-13 16:48:17Z henningw $
 main.c compiled on 10:14:11 May 18 2010 with gcc 4.3.2

 Using dispatcher module trying to load balance SIP calls across some
 Asterisk servers.  I have it working fine when I test in this
 scenario:

 sip phone dial outasteriskkamailioround robin to several asterisk
 servers

 This works stateful and stateless, handles everything gracefully.

 This scenario is giving me fits:

 sipp dial outkamailioround robin to several asterisk servers

 I get retransmits on every call back to sipp with errors like
 Discarding message which can't be mapped to a known SIPp call and
 SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist

 This happens with kamailio setup stateful or stateless.  I'm wondering
 if sipp is the problem or just doesn't play well with kamailio?

 I've kept the config as simple as possible for testing, it is listed
 here http://pastebin.com/BZ8hJvJv

 Here is my sipp usage:

 sipp -sn uac 10.10.12.53 -i 10.10.14.97 -s 55 -d 7000 -l 10 -r 1
 -trace_err

 Any insight would be appriciated.




 the problem is in your sipp scenario. The uac calls do not map to uas.
 kamailio does not reply 481,  check the uas scenario, that is the one
 that
 sends back the 481.

 Cheers,
 Daniel

 --
 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
 Miami, Fl, USA - June 21-23, 2010
 http://www.asipto.com/index.php/kamailio-advanced-training/




 Thanks Daniel, I reveiwed the sipp docs, '-sn uas' just sits there as
 a responder, it will not initiate calls to kamailio.  I don't
 understand what you are getting at?  How would I use this type of
 scenario to test?


 keeping the mailing list cc-ed is recommended, since others can respond
 faster and new people can benefit of the discussion.

 What I wanted to say is that kamailio does not reply 481. So the problem is
 in the responder of requests sent by UAC and forwarded by Kamailio. Somehow,
 the dialog is destroyed before the BYE (or other in-dialog request) is sent
 by UAS.

 If you can grab the SIP trace of such call (e.g., using ngrep on kamailio
 server), I can give more hits (try to select the sip flow for one such call
 only, sending full sip trace will be too big).

 Cheers,
 Daniel
Thanks Daniel.  I've moved on from the Dispatcher and now working with
the carrierroute.  The first thing I notice is the transactions, being
stateful has resolved the issue I was seeing with the dispatcher and
sipp sending invites.  So and I don't have the dispatcher setup to
collect sip traces, best I can tell is either my configuration or the
lack of stateful tracking in the dispatcher module was the cause of my
original post.

I'm going to move the discussion along to a new topic for now, thanks.

JR
-- 
JR Richardson
Engineering for the Masses

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] sipp and stateful transaction problem

2010-05-24 Thread JR Richardson
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote:


 On 21.05.2010 23:46, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

 Hello,

 On 5/21/10 10:47 PM, JR Richardson wrote:

 Hi All,

 I'm doing some testing with kamailio 1.5:

 kamailio1:/etc/kamailio# kamailio -V
 version: kamailio 1.5.4-notls (i386/linux)
 flags: STATISTICS, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
 SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
 ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, PKG_SIZE 4194304
 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
 svnrevision: 2:6005M
 @(#) $Id: main.c 5608 2009-02-13 16:48:17Z henningw $
 main.c compiled on 10:14:11 May 18 2010 with gcc 4.3.2

 Using dispatcher module trying to load balance SIP calls across some
 Asterisk servers. I have it working fine when I test in this
 scenario:

 sip phone dial outasteriskkamailioround robin to several
 asterisk servers

 This works stateful and stateless, handles everything gracefully.

 This scenario is giving me fits:

 sipp dial outkamailioround robin to several asterisk servers

 I get retransmits on every call back to sipp with errors like

 what means call back?

sipp send invite to kamailio which forwards to asterisk in dispatcher
list, asterisk responds
back to kamailio which forwards that response back to sipp and I get the error:
SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist on sipp.

So I think this is not supposed to work like I want it to.  The
dispatcher module is for
stateless processing only, so even though I have  RR and TM functions
in my routing script
it does not act properly.  I don't think I can use dispatcher for what
I want, which is a
stateful load balancer.

I am looking at 3.0 and carrierroute or lcr module.

Thanks.

JR



 You are operating sipp in uac mode - thus it is not capable of receiving
 requests.

 Maybe Asterisk is send reINVITEs which are not handled correctly by sipp.
 set canreinvite=no in sip.conf (Asterisk)

 regards
 klaus

 Discarding message which can't be mapped to a known SIPp call and
 SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist

 This happens with kamailio setup stateful or stateless. I'm wondering
 if sipp is the problem or just doesn't play well with kamailio?

 I've kept the config as simple as possible for testing, it is listed
 here http://pastebin.com/BZ8hJvJv

 Here is my sipp usage:

 sipp -sn uac 10.10.12.53 -i 10.10.14.97 -s 55 -d 7000 -l 10 -r 1
 -trace_err

 Any insight would be appriciated.

 the problem is in your sipp scenario. The uac calls do not map to uas.
 kamailio does not reply 481, check the uas scenario, that is the one
 that sends back the 481.

 Cheers,
 Daniel





-- 
JR Richardson
Engineering for the Masses

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] sipp and stateful transaction problem

2010-05-21 Thread JR Richardson
Hi All,

I'm doing some testing with kamailio 1.5:

kamailio1:/etc/kamailio# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 1.5.4-notls (i386/linux)
flags: STATISTICS, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, PKG_SIZE 4194304
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
svnrevision: 2:6005M
@(#) $Id: main.c 5608 2009-02-13 16:48:17Z henningw $
main.c compiled on 10:14:11 May 18 2010 with gcc 4.3.2

Using dispatcher module trying to load balance SIP calls across some
Asterisk servers.  I have it working fine when I test in this
scenario:

sip phone dial outasteriskkamailioround robin to several asterisk servers

This works stateful and stateless, handles everything gracefully.

This scenario is giving me fits:

sipp dial outkamailioround robin to several asterisk servers

I get retransmits on every call back to sipp with errors like
Discarding message which can't be mapped to a known SIPp call and
SIP/2.0 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist

This happens with kamailio setup stateful or stateless.  I'm wondering
if sipp is the problem or just doesn't play well with kamailio?

I've kept the config as simple as possible for testing, it is listed
here http://pastebin.com/BZ8hJvJv

Here is my sipp usage:

sipp -sn uac 10.10.12.53 -i 10.10.14.97 -s 55 -d 7000 -l 10 -r 1 -trace_err

Any insight would be appriciated.

Thanks.

JR
-- 
JR Richardson
Engineering for the Masses

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users