Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 


On 06/01/2017 09:15, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> it is working but some braces are missing.
>

Providing more details would help to understand what you are meaning and
where you think the issue is -- just a dry note is not helpful.

Daniel

> Thanks for support. Have a nice day.
>
> [root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
> [root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
> {
> routes: {
> {
> carrier: default
> id: 1
> domains: {
> {
> domain: 185.88.7.201
> id: 1
> data: {
>  3: 100.000 %,
> '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1', '338'
> }
> data: {
> }
> }
> domains: {
> }
> }
> routes: {
> }
>
> [root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
> {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":"default","id":1,"domains":[{"domain":"myip","id":1,"data":["
> 
> 3: 100.000 %, '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1',
> '338'"]}]}]},"id":19726}
> [root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
> {
> routes: {
> {
> carrier: default
> id: 1
> domains: {
> {
> domain: 185.88.7.201
> id: 1
> data: {
>  3: 100.000 %,
> '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1', '338'
> }
> data: {
> }
> }
> domains: {
> }
> }
> routes: {
> }
>
>
> 6.01.2017 10:56 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think I found the issue -- an improper pointer was passed to rpc
>> struct_add. Fetch again master and try to see if this time all goes ok.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 05/01/2017 09:47, Yasin CANER wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>> it gives error as below.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> [root@Test  master]# 10(29238) ERROR: _ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]:
>>> rpc_struct_add(): failed to add attribute-value (S)_
>>> 10(29238) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
>>> cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count 0
>>>
>>>
>>> 5.01.2017 11:17 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:

 Hello,

 thanks, got some leads with the new log messages, so I pushed
 another commit to see which of the fields there is causing the
 problem. Can you fetch again master and give it another try?

 Cheers,
 Daniel


 On 05/01/2017 09:09, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> Results are here. Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio
> V4.1.9 and it works. here version is kamailio 5.0.0-dev10 . it is
> started with "kamailio -dd -E"
>
>
> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
> error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
> [root@Test  master]#
> [root@Test  master]#
> [root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
> {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":["
>  
> NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '', '338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
>
>
> here is log
>
>
> [root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
> [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id 1) has
> 1 domains
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route(): adding
> prefix , prob 1.00
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_carrier.c:98]: add_domain_data():
> adding domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
> carrierroute [cr_data.c:412]: get_domain_data_or_add(): added
> domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
> carrierroute [cr_data.c:468]: add_route(): found carrier and
> domain, now adding route
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:118]: add_route_rule(): no
> backed up rules
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:653]: rule_fixup(): fixing
> tree mydomainip
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:613]:
> rule_fixup_recursor(): hashless rule with host ip:5060 hash,
> hash_index

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-06 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    it is working
but some braces are missing.
Thanks for support.
Have a nice day.
  
[root@TestDispatcher
~]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
[root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
{
    routes: {
    {
    carrier: default
    id: 1
    domains: {
    {
    domain: 185.88.7.201
    id: 1
    data: {
 3:
100.000 %, '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1', '338'
    }
    data: {
    }
    }
    domains: {
    }
    }
    routes: {
    }
[root@TestDispatcher
~]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":"default","id":1,"domains":[{"domain":"myip","id":1,"data":["
3: 100.000 %, '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1',
'338'"]}]}]},"id":19726}
[root@TestDispatcher ~]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
{
    routes: {
    {
    carrier: default
    id: 1
    domains: {
    {
    domain: 185.88.7.201
    id: 1
    data: {
 3:
100.000 %, '192.168.4.180:5060': ON, '0', '2', '1', '338'
    }
    data: {
    }
    }
    domains: {
    }
    }
    routes: {
    }
  


6.01.2017 10:56 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Hello,
  I think I found the issue -- an improper pointer was passed to
rpc struct_add. Fetch again master and try to see if this time
all goes ok.
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 05/01/2017 09:47, Yasin CANER
wrote:
  
  

Hello;
    it gives
error as below.
Cheers.
  
[root@Test 
master]# 10(29238) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]:
  rpc_struct_add(): failed to add attribute-value (S)
10(29238) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count
0
  


5.01.2017 11:17 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Hello,
  thanks, got some leads with the new log messages, so I
pushed another commit to see which of the fields there is
causing the problem. Can you fetch again master and give it
another try?
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 05/01/2017 09:09, Yasin CANER
wrote:
  
  

Hello;
Results are
here. Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio
V4.1.9 and it works. here version is kamailio
5.0.0-dev10 . it is started with "kamailio -dd -E"
  

  
[root@Test 
master]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
[root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":[" 
NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '',
'338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
  


here is log


[root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
  [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id
  1) has 1 domains
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route():
  adding prefix , prob 1.00

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

I think I found the issue -- an improper pointer was passed to rpc
struct_add. Fetch again master and try to see if this time all goes ok.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 05/01/2017 09:47, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> it gives error as below.
>
> Cheers.
>
> [root@Test  master]# 10(29238) ERROR: _ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]:
> rpc_struct_add(): failed to add attribute-value (S)_
> 10(29238) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]: cr_rpc_dump_routes():
> add carrier structure failure at count 0
>
>
> 5.01.2017 11:17 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> thanks, got some leads with the new log messages, so I pushed another
>> commit to see which of the fields there is causing the problem. Can
>> you fetch again master and give it another try?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 05/01/2017 09:09, Yasin CANER wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>> Results are here. Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio
>>> V4.1.9 and it works. here version is kamailio 5.0.0-dev10 . it is
>>> started with "kamailio -dd -E"
>>>
>>>
>>> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
>>> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
>>> error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
>>> [root@Test  master]#
>>> [root@Test  master]#
>>> [root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
>>> {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":["
>>>  
>>> NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '', '338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
>>>
>>>
>>> here is log
>>>
>>>
>>> [root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
>>> [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id 1) has 1
>>> domains
>>> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route(): adding
>>> prefix , prob 1.00
>>> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_carrier.c:98]: add_domain_data():
>>> adding domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
>>> carrierroute [cr_data.c:412]: get_domain_data_or_add(): added domain
>>> 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
>>> [cr_data.c:468]: add_route(): found carrier and domain, now adding route
>>> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:118]: add_route_rule(): no
>>> backed up rules
>>> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:653]: rule_fixup(): fixing
>>> tree mydomainip
>>> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:613]: rule_fixup_recursor():
>>> hashless rule with host ip:5060 hash, hash_index 1
>>> _10(9666) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]: rpc_struct_add(): failed
>>> to add attribute-value__
>>> __10(9666) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
>>> cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count 0_
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition , I tried to modify code like this  and it didnt work
>>> either. it gives same error.
>>>
>>>
>>> if(rpc->struct_add(dh, "Sd[", "carrier", "at",
>>> "id", "123",
>>> "domains",  )<0) {
>>> LM_ERR("add carrier structure
>>> failure at count %d\n", i);
>>> rpc->fault(ctx, 500, "Internal error
>>> - carrier structure");
>>> goto error;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> 5.01.2017 00:39 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
 kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>
> -- 
> 

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-05 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    it gives error
as below.
Cheers.
  
[root@Test  master]#
10(29238) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]: rpc_struct_add():
  failed to add attribute-value (S)
10(29238) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count 0
  


5.01.2017 11:17 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Hello,
  thanks, got some leads with the new log messages, so I pushed
another commit to see which of the fields there is causing the
problem. Can you fetch again master and give it another try?
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 05/01/2017 09:09, Yasin CANER
wrote:
  
  

Hello;
Results are
here. Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio V4.1.9
and it works. here version is kamailio 5.0.0-dev10 . it is
started with "kamailio -dd -E"
  

  
[root@Test 
master]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
[root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":[" 
NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '',
'338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
  


here is log


[root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
  [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id 1)
  has 1 domains
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route():
  adding prefix , prob 1.00
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_carrier.c:98]:
  add_domain_data(): adding domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1
  'default'10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:412]:
  get_domain_data_or_add(): added domain 1 'mydomainip' to
  carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
  [cr_data.c:468]: add_route(): found carrier and domain, now
  adding route
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:118]: add_route_rule():
  no backed up rules
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:653]: rule_fixup():
  fixing tree mydomainip
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:613]:
  rule_fixup_recursor(): hashless rule with host ip:5060 hash,
  hash_index 1
  10(9666) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]: rpc_struct_add():
failed to add attribute-value
  10(9666) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count
0



In addition , I tried to modify code like this  and it didnt
  work either. it gives same error.



                    if(rpc->struct_add(dh, "Sd[",
  "carrier", "at",
      "id", "123",
      "domains", 
  )<0) {
      LM_ERR("add carrier structure
  failure at count %d\n", i);
      rpc->fault(ctx, 500,
  "Internal error - carrier structure");
      goto error;
      }
  


5.01.2017 00:39 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:

kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes

-- 
  
  
  

  

  
  
  -- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


-- 
  
  
  

  

  

  

  

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

thanks, got some leads with the new log messages, so I pushed another
commit to see which of the fields there is causing the problem. Can you
fetch again master and give it another try?

Cheers,
Daniel


On 05/01/2017 09:09, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> Results are here. Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio
> V4.1.9 and it works. here version is kamailio 5.0.0-dev10 . it is
> started with "kamailio -dd -E"
>
>
> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.reload_routes
> [root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
> error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
> [root@Test  master]#
> [root@Test  master]#
> [root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
> {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":["
>  
> NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '', '338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
>
>
> here is log
>
>
> [root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
> [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id 1) has 1
> domains
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route(): adding
> prefix , prob 1.00
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_carrier.c:98]: add_domain_data():
> adding domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
> carrierroute [cr_data.c:412]: get_domain_data_or_add(): added domain 1
> 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
> [cr_data.c:468]: add_route(): found carrier and domain, now adding route
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:118]: add_route_rule(): no
> backed up rules
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:653]: rule_fixup(): fixing tree
> mydomainip
> 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:613]: rule_fixup_recursor():
> hashless rule with host ip:5060 hash, hash_index 1
> _10(9666) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]: rpc_struct_add(): failed to
> add attribute-value__
> __10(9666) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]: cr_rpc_dump_routes():
> add carrier structure failure at count 0_
>
>
> In addition , I tried to modify code like this  and it didnt work
> either. it gives same error.
>
>
> if(rpc->struct_add(dh, "Sd[", "carrier", "at",
> "id", "123",
> "domains",  )<0) {
> LM_ERR("add carrier structure failure
> at count %d\n", i);
> rpc->fault(ctx, 500, "Internal error -
> carrier structure");
> goto error;
> }
>
>
> 5.01.2017 00:39 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>> kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
>
> -- 
> 

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-05 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
Results are here.
Once i tried carrierroute config with kamailio V4.1.9 and it
works. here version is kamailio 5.0.0-dev10 . it is started with
"kamailio -dd -E"
  

  
[root@Test  master]#
kamcmd cr.reload_routes
[root@Test  master]# kamcmd cr.dump_routes
error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]#
[root@Test  master]# kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"routes":[{"carrier":,"id":1,"domains":[{"domain":,"id":1,"data":[" 
NULL: 100.000 %, 'ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '',
'338'"]}]}]},"id":9684}
  


here is log


[root@TestDispatcher master]# 10(9666) INFO: carrierroute
  [cr_db.c:315]: load_route_data_db(): carrier 'default' (id 1) has
  1 domains
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:456]: add_route(): adding
  prefix , prob 1.00
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_carrier.c:98]: add_domain_data():
  adding domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
  carrierroute [cr_data.c:412]: get_domain_data_or_add(): added
  domain 1 'mydomainip' to carrier 1 'default'10(9666) INFO:
  carrierroute [cr_data.c:468]: add_route(): found carrier and
  domain, now adding route
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:118]: add_route_rule(): no
  backed up rules
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:653]: rule_fixup(): fixing
  tree mydomainip
  10(9666) INFO: carrierroute [cr_data.c:613]:
  rule_fixup_recursor(): hashless rule with host ip:5060 hash,
  hash_index 1
  10(9666) ERROR: ctl [binrpc_run.c:1112]: rpc_struct_add():
failed to add attribute-value
  10(9666) ERROR: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1192]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): add carrier structure failure at count 0



In addition , I tried to modify code like this  and it didnt work
  either. it gives same error.



                    if(rpc->struct_add(dh, "Sd[", "carrier",
  "at",
      "id", "123",
      "domains", 
  )<0) {
      LM_ERR("add carrier structure
  failure at count %d\n", i);
      rpc->fault(ctx, 500, "Internal
  error - carrier structure");
      goto error;
      }
  


5.01.2017 00:39 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:

kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes

-- 
  
  
  

  

  

  

  

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

thanks for testing...

Can you use latest master version, load jsonrpcs.so module and then
issue the command:

kamctl rpc cr.dump_routes

Note that you may need to edit kamctlrc and set ctl engine to RPCFIFO if
you have an older version of kamctlrc file installed.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 04/01/2017 11:58, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> lastest master branched is pulled and worked with kamailio -ddd -E
> . cr.reload method works fine but cr.dump_routes gives error message
> like "error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure"
>
> debug messages are here
>
> "[  master]# 13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:380]:
> io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x7f05c23756c0, 8, 3, 0x1722410),
> fd_no=1
> 13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:442]: handle_new_connect():
> handle_stream read: new connection (1) on /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
> 13(1479) DEBUG: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]: cr_rpc_dump_routes():
> start processing of data
> 13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:495]: handle_stream_read():
> handle_stream read: eof on /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
> 13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del(): DBG:
> io_watch_del (0x7f05c23756c0, 8, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called
> "
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-04 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
      I think problem is my config. 4.4.4 version is cloned and try
  to run. it runs kamailio but kamctl cr reload command gives error
  "ERROR: This command requires a database engine - none was loaded"
  I am digging configuration. In additon , how can understand
  carrier module is loaded?
  
  Cheers.
  
  

4.01.2017 13:58 tarihinde Yasin CANER
  yazdı:


  
  Hello;
      lastest master
  branched is pulled and worked with kamailio -ddd -E .
  cr.reload method works fine but cr.dump_routes gives error
  message like "error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure"
  

      debug messages
  are here
  "[  master]#
  13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:380]:
  io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x7f05c23756c0, 8, 3,
  0x1722410), fd_no=1
  13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:442]: handle_new_connect():
  handle_stream read: new connection (1) on
  /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
  13(1479) DEBUG: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]:
  cr_rpc_dump_routes(): start processing of data
  13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:495]: handle_stream_read():
  handle_stream read: eof on /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
  13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:602]:
  io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x7f05c23756c0, 8, -1,
  0x10) fd_no=2 called
  "
  
  My table structer  is that;
  
  
  
 
  
domain_name




















  
  
#
  id
 domain




















  
  
1'
 'myip'




















  
  
























  
  
carrierroute
  
  
#
  id
 carrier
 domain
 scan_prefix
 flags
 mask
 prob
 strip

  rewrite_host

  rewrite_prefix

  rewrite_suffix
 description
  
  
1'
 '1'
 '1'
 ''
 '0'
 '0'
 '1'
 '0'
 'ip:5060'
 ''
 ''
 '338'
  
  
























  
  
carrier_name




















  
  
#
  id
 carrier




















  
  
1'
 'default'

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-04 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    lastest master
branched is pulled and worked with kamailio -ddd -E . cr.reload
method works fine but cr.dump_routes gives error message like
"error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure" 
  
    debug messages
are here
"[  master]#
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add():
DBG: io_watch_add(0x7f05c23756c0, 8, 3, 0x1722410), fd_no=1
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:442]: handle_new_connect():
handle_stream read: new connection (1) on
/var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
13(1479) DEBUG: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): start processing of data
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:495]: handle_stream_read():
handle_stream read: eof on /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del():
DBG: io_watch_del (0x7f05c23756c0, 8, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called
"

My table structer  is that;



   

  domain_name
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  # id
   domain
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  1'
   'myip'
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  carrierroute


  # id
   carrier
   domain
   scan_prefix
   flags
   mask
   prob
   strip
   rewrite_host
   rewrite_prefix
   rewrite_suffix
   description


  1'
   '1'
   '1'
   ''
   '0'
   '0'
   '1'
   '0'
   'ip:5060'
   ''
   ''
   '338'


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  carrier_name
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  # id
   carrier
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  1'
   'default'
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  domain
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  # id
   domain
   did
   last_modified
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  1'
   'myip'
   '1'
   '2016-02-11 12:18:00'
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  





3.01.2017 12:55 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Hello,
  quick follow up to see if you got any chance to test with
latest master.

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2017-01-04 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    kamailio Version 4.1 installed and tried same configuration
  with carrierroute. it is working kamctl function but i had to
  remove  a "require_dbengine"
  function in kamctl. it checks that is it suport db_mysql. Anyway ,
  configuration is working with kamctl cr , it can dumping and
  reload.
link
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/dc5a9e96a20c1099601ef5c6516458532da3124a/utils/kamctl/kamctl
line (1432)

Cheers.




[root@Test  kamailio41]# kamctl cr dump
  Printing routing information:
  Printing tree for carrier 'default' (1)
  Printing tree for domain 'myip' (1)
    NULL: 100.000 %, ' ip:5060': ON, '0', '', '', '338'
  


4.01.2017 14:24 tarihinde Yasin CANER
  yazdı:


  
  Hello;
    I think problem is my config. 4.4.4 version is cloned and
try to run. it runs kamailio but kamctl cr reload command gives
error "ERROR: This command requires a database engine - none was
loaded" I am digging configuration. In additon , how can
understand carrier module is loaded?

Cheers.


  
  4.01.2017 13:58 tarihinde Yasin CANER
yazdı:
  
  

Hello;
    lastest
master branched is pulled and worked with kamailio -ddd -E .
cr.reload method works fine but cr.dump_routes gives error
message like "error: 500 - Internal error - carrier
structure" 
  
    debug
messages are here
"[  master]#
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:380]:
io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x7f05c23756c0, 8, 3,
0x1722410), fd_no=1
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:442]:
handle_new_connect(): handle_stream read: new connection (1)
on /var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
13(1479) DEBUG: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]:
cr_rpc_dump_routes(): start processing of data
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [io_listener.c:495]:
handle_stream_read(): handle_stream read: eof on
/var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl
13(1479) DEBUG: ctl [../../core/io_wait.h:602]:
io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x7f05c23756c0, 8, -1,
0x10) fd_no=2 called
"

My table structer  is that;



   

  domain_name
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  # id
   domain
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  1'
   'myip'
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  carrierroute


  # id
   carrier
   domain
  
scan_prefix
   flags
   mask
   prob
   strip
  
rewrite_host
  
rewrite_prefix
  
rewrite_suffix
  
description


  1'
   '1'
   '1'
   ''
   '0'
   '0'
   '1'
   '0'
   'ip:5060'
   ''
   ''
   '338'

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

can you fetch again the git master, recompile, reinstall and test again?
Send here the log messages you get in syslog, because I added some log
messages inside the function that fails now.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 23/12/2016 12:39, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> it is not working. it gives error like below.i added simple 
> configuration. reload command working fine but dump gives error. i
> have a look at code but couldnt find why cannot add in structs.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 13(32039) DEBUG: carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]: cr_rpc_dump_routes():
> start processing of data
>
> error: 500 - Internal error - carrier structure
>
>
> 23.12.2016 11:46 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>>
>> Btw, if you use kamctl, then all should just work with the same
>> commands like in the past if you fetch (at this time) latest git
>> repository and load jsonrpcs module in your config. You may need to
>> deploy latest kamctlrc, if you do an update and you did changes in
>> the old one.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 23/12/2016 09:39, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks. Note that I just pushed another commit renaming the
>>> command from cr.dump to cr.dump_routes in order to match better the
>>> mi old command.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/12/2016 09:35, Yasin CANER wrote:

 Hello;

 I will try it now. Thanks.



 23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git master, can
> you give it a try and report the issues? I don't use the module so
> I had no testing environment to play with it.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> you are right. some carrier route functions are missing.important
>> of them are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
>> 6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP
>> Router] yazdı:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
>>> command for reload operations. But there are some other mi
>>> commands not
>>> implemented as rpc.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > few that are missing can be probably added once we discover
>>> them. The
>>> > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware
>>> of a mi
>>> > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull
>>> request :-)
>>> > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather
>>> easy to
>>> > lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Daniel
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
>>> >> Hello
>>> >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
>>> >> Cheers.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> View this message in context:
>>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
>>> >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>
>>> >> ___
>>> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
>>> mailing list
>>> >> [hidden email] 
>>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
>>> mailing list
>>> [hidden email] 
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>> discussion below:
>>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the
>>> MI code, click here.
>>> NAML
>>> 
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> 
>>
>>

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    it is not
working. it gives error like below.i added simple  configuration.
reload command working fine but dump gives error. i have a look
at code but couldnt find why cannot add in structs.
Thanks
  

  

  
13(32039) DEBUG:
carrierroute [cr_fifo.c:1177]: cr_rpc_dump_routes(): start
processing of data
error: 500 -
  Internal error - carrier structure
  


23.12.2016 11:46 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Btw, if you use kamctl, then all should just work with the same
commands like in the past if you fetch (at this time) latest git
repository and load jsonrpcs module in your config. You may need
to deploy latest kamctlrc, if you do an update and you did
changes in the old one.
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 23/12/2016 09:39,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
  
  

Ok, thanks. Note that I just pushed another commit renaming
  the command from cr.dump to cr.dump_routes in order to match
  better the mi old command.
Cheers,
  Daniel


On 23/12/2016 09:35, Yasin CANER
  wrote:


  
  Hello;
      I will try
  it now. Thanks.
  
  
  
  23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde
Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
  
  

Hello,
I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git
  master, can you give it a try and report the issues? I
  don't use the module so I had no testing environment to
  play with it.
Cheers,
  Daniel


On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner
  wrote:


  
  Hello,
  you are
  right. some carrier route functions are
  missing.important of them are dump and show methods.if
  i have time ,i can add them.
  Cheers.
  
  
  6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde
Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router] yazdı:
  
   Hello, 

looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has
already rpc 
command for reload operations. But there are some other
mi commands not 
implemented as rpc. 

Cheers, 
Daniel 


On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

  > Hello, 
  > 
  > few that are missing can be probably added once
  we discover them. The 
  > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever
  you are aware of a mi 
  > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will
  be a pull request :-) 
  > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex
  and rather easy to 
  > lean by looking at other variants with both
  implementations. 
  > 
  > Cheers, 
  > Daniel 
  > 
  > 
  > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote: 
  >> Hello 
  >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC
  command., we need to add it 
  >> Cheers. 
  >> 
  >> 
  >> 
  >> -- 
  >> View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
  >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at
  Nabble.com. 
  >> 
  >>
  ___ 
  >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
  (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list 
  >> [hidden
email] 
  >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
www.twitter.com/miconda
-- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com



___ 
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list 
[hidden
  email]

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    Thanks for your
support. my main kamailio is 4.1 Version. Dump and reload
functions is fine for me. I am really sorry i couldnt help you
about it. I am testing  CR module now. 
  
Thanks


23.12.2016 11:46 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Btw, if you use kamctl, then all should just work with the same
commands like in the past if you fetch (at this time) latest git
repository and load jsonrpcs module in your config. You may need
to deploy latest kamctlrc, if you do an update and you did
changes in the old one.
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 23/12/2016 09:39,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
  
  

Ok, thanks. Note that I just pushed another commit renaming
  the command from cr.dump to cr.dump_routes in order to match
  better the mi old command.
Cheers,
  Daniel


On 23/12/2016 09:35, Yasin CANER
  wrote:


  
  Hello;
      I will try
  it now. Thanks.
  
  
  
  23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde
Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
  
  

Hello,
I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git
  master, can you give it a try and report the issues? I
  don't use the module so I had no testing environment to
  play with it.
Cheers,
  Daniel


On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner
  wrote:


  
  Hello,
  you are
  right. some carrier route functions are
  missing.important of them are dump and show methods.if
  i have time ,i can add them.
  Cheers.
  
  
  6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde
Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router] yazdı:
  
   Hello, 

looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has
already rpc 
command for reload operations. But there are some other
mi commands not 
implemented as rpc. 

Cheers, 
Daniel 


On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

  > Hello, 
  > 
  > few that are missing can be probably added once
  we discover them. The 
  > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever
  you are aware of a mi 
  > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will
  be a pull request :-) 
  > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex
  and rather easy to 
  > lean by looking at other variants with both
  implementations. 
  > 
  > Cheers, 
  > Daniel 
  > 
  > 
  > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote: 
  >> Hello 
  >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC
  command., we need to add it 
  >> Cheers. 
  >> 
  >> 
  >> 
  >> -- 
  >> View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
  >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at
  Nabble.com. 
  >> 
  >>
  ___ 
  >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
  (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list 
  >> [hidden
email] 
  >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
www.twitter.com/miconda
-- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com



___ 
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list 
[hidden
  email] 
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




  If you reply to this
email, your

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Btw, if you use kamctl, then all should just work with the same commands
like in the past if you fetch (at this time) latest git repository and
load jsonrpcs module in your config. You may need to deploy latest
kamctlrc, if you do an update and you did changes in the old one.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 23/12/2016 09:39, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. Note that I just pushed another commit renaming the
> command from cr.dump to cr.dump_routes in order to match better the mi
> old command.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 23/12/2016 09:35, Yasin CANER wrote:
>>
>> Hello;
>>
>> I will try it now. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> 23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git master, can
>>> you give it a try and report the issues? I don't use the module so I
>>> had no testing environment to play with it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:

 Hello,

 you are right. some carrier route functions are missing.important
 of them are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.

 Cheers.


 6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP
 Router] yazdı:
> Hello,
>
> looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
> command for reload operations. But there are some other mi
> commands not
> implemented as rpc.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > few that are missing can be probably added once we discover
> them. The
> > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware
> of a mi
> > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull
> request :-)
> > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather
> easy to
> > lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
> >> Hello
> >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
> >> Cheers.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
> >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> ___
> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
> mailing list
> >> [hidden email] 
> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
> list
> [hidden email] 
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
>
> To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI
> code, click here.
> NAML
> 
>

 -- 
 

 
 View this message in context: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to
 remove the MI code
 
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive
  at Nabble.com.


 ___
 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
 sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>> -- 
>> 
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

--

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Ok, thanks. Note that I just pushed another commit renaming the command
from cr.dump to cr.dump_routes in order to match better the mi old command.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 23/12/2016 09:35, Yasin CANER wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> I will try it now. Thanks.
>
>
>
> 23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git master, can you
>> give it a try and report the issues? I don't use the module so I had
>> no testing environment to play with it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> you are right. some carrier route functions are missing.important of
>>> them are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>
>>> 6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP
>>> Router] yazdı:
 Hello,

 looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
 command for reload operations. But there are some other mi commands
 not
 implemented as rpc.

 Cheers,
 Daniel


 On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

 > Hello,
 >
 > few that are missing can be probably added once we discover them.
 The
 > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware of
 a mi
 > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull
 request :-)
 > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather easy to
 > lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Daniel
 >
 >
 > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
 >> Hello
 >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
 >> Cheers.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> --
 >> View this message in context:
 http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
 >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 >>
 >> ___
 >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
 mailing list
 >> [hidden email] 
 >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

 -- 
 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
 Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


 ___
 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
 list
 [hidden email] 
 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


 
 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
 discussion below:
 http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html

 To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI
 code, click here.
 NAML
 

>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>> View this message in context: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to
>>> remove the MI code
>>> 
>>> Sent from the Users mailing list archive
>>>  at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>
> -- 
> 

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Yasin CANER 

  
  
Hello;
    I will try it
now. Thanks.



23.12.2016 11:33 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla yazdı:


  
  Hello,
  I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git master,
can you give it a try and report the issues? I don't use the
module so I had no testing environment to play with it.
  Cheers,
Daniel
  
  
  On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:
  
  

Hello,
you are right.
some carrier route functions are missing.important of them
are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.
Cheers.


6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router] yazdı:

 Hello, 
  
  looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already
  rpc 
  command for reload operations. But there are some other mi
  commands not 
  implemented as rpc. 
  
  Cheers, 
  Daniel 
  
  
  On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
  
> Hello, 
> 
> few that are missing can be probably added once we
discover them. The 
> best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you
are aware of a mi 
> command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a
pull request :-) 
> -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and
rather easy to 
> lean by looking at other variants with both
implementations. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> Daniel 
> 
> 
> On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote: 
>> Hello 
>> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we
need to add it 
>> Cheers. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
>> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com. 
>> 
>> ___ 
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list 
>> [hidden
  email] 
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
  
  -- 
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
  www.twitter.com/miconda
  -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
  
  Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com 
  
  
  ___ 
  SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
  mailing list 
  [hidden email]
  
  http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
  
  
  
  
If you reply to this email,
  your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
  
  
To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove
the MI code, click here.
NAML 


-- 
  
  
  

  


 View this message in context: Re:
  VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code
Sent from the Users
  mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

  
  
  -- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


-- 
  
  
  

  

  

  

  

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

I just pushed a commit for cr.dump rpc command in git master, can you
give it a try and report the issues? I don't use the module so I had no
testing environment to play with it.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> you are right. some carrier route functions are missing.important of
> them are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> 6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router]
> yazdı:
>> Hello,
>>
>> looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
>> command for reload operations. But there are some other mi commands not
>> implemented as rpc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > few that are missing can be probably added once we discover them. The
>> > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware of a mi
>> > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull request :-)
>> > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather easy to
>> > lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> >
>> > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
>> >> Hello
>> >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
>> >> Cheers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
>> >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> >> [hidden email] 
>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> [hidden email] 
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> 
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
>>
>> To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI
>> code, click here.
>> NAML
>> 
>>
>
> -- 
> 
>
> 
> View this message in context: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to
> remove the MI code
> 
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive
>  at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

comparing the list of rpc vs mi commands, also taking in consideration
the interest and expressed feedback from the community, there is no
reason to keep MI code longer. Also, during the last days it was
signaled that mi_xmlrpc code will need an upgrade for next versions of
compilers and xmlrpc-c library, so it's better to get rid of it as soon
as possible to avoid work for something to be removed soon.

It should not be any complex work to add the very few missing rpc
commands from the mi alternative, so whoever is using a mi command that
is not yet available as rpc, should open an issue on bug tracker.

Converting the code from mi to rpc is not complex and everyone is
encourage to try converting what they use from mi and it is not a rpc. I
can help troubleshooting, provide guidelines, but I have no time to
setup test environments for modules that I don use and I don't need
those mi/rpc commands.

There is documentation about the RPC API:

  - http://www.kamailio.org/docs/docbooks/5.0.x/rpc_api/rpc_api.html

But looking at other modules that have both mi and rpc commands can be a
way to learn quickly how to do it.

In several days I plan to start removing MI code, first in the modules
that have the rpc commands.

Cheers,
Daniel



On 01/12/2016 15:17, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we started discussing about removing MI (so called management interface)
> for very long time, more or less since 2008. The RPC should remain the
> control interface, given its better structure for commands, parameters,
> etc ... MI is custom protocol using a line-oriented communication via
> fifo or socket file with kamailio (e.g., implemented mi_fifo and
> mi_datagram modules). RPC is the alternative, a more standardized
> concept, with better structured format.
>
> I think it's time to set a clear roadmap for doing the removal. Overall,
> it will be easier to maintain the code, right now being duplicated code
> for doing the same operation over MI or RPC, and MI shows its
> limitations (or complexity to deal with) for advanced needs (see the
> discussions about how to provide multi-line value parameters over MI).
>
> So, I want to know if there are many relying on MI directly and they
> still want to keep it, what would be the expected duration they need for
> upgrading their tools to work with RPC interface, other relevant aspects
> people have in favour of mi vs rpc.
>
> I am even willing to do the removal in time befire freezing the 5.0
> branch. We will ensure a clean start of 5.x series.
>
> The main concern from my point of view is kamctl -- but I think we can
> preserve the compatibility for kamctl commands and parameters (so
> command line execution of kamctl will be the same), but the output might
> be different. That's because it should be easy to updated it to
> communicate with jsonrpc-s module, but then it will get json-formatted
> results.
>
> To summarize, two big questions to answer:
>
> a) Are you ok to remove the MI code/commands?
>
> b) If yes to a), are you ok to be done for v5.0?
>
> Not providing feedback will be considered as 'yes' for both questions,
> so **speak up if you want MI to be kept or delay it removal**.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,


On 06/12/2016 08:54, ycaner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> you are right. some carrier route functions are missing.important of
> them are dump and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them.
>
that will be great if you can contribute.

Cheers,
Daniel

> Cheers.
>
>
> 6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router]
> yazdı:
>> Hello,
>>
>> looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
>> command for reload operations. But there are some other mi commands not
>> implemented as rpc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > few that are missing can be probably added once we discover them. The
>> > best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware of a mi
>> > command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull request :-)
>> > -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather easy to
>> > lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> >
>> > On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
>> >> Hello
>> >> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
>> >> Cheers.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
>> >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> >> [hidden email] 
>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> [hidden email] 
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> 
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
>>
>> To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI
>> code, click here.
>> NAML
>> 
>>
>
> -- 
> 
>
> 
> View this message in context: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to
> remove the MI code
> 
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive
>  at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-05 Thread ycaner 

  

  
  
Hello, 
you are right. some
carrier route functions are missing.important of them are dump
and show methods.if i have time ,i can add them. 
Cheers. 


6.12.2016 10:48 tarihinde
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router] yazdı: 

 Hello,
  
  
  looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
  
  command for reload operations. But there are some other mi
  commands not
  
  implemented as rpc.
  
  
  Cheers,
  
  Daniel
  
  
  
  On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
  
 Hello,



 few that are missing can be probably added once we discover
them. The

 best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are
aware of a mi

 command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull
request :-)

 -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and
rather easy to

 lean by looking at other variants with both
implementations.



 Cheers,

 Daniel





 On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:

 Hello

 Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need
to add it 
 Cheers.







 --

 View this message in context: 
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
 
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



 ___

 SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list

 [hidden email] 

 http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
  
  -- 
  Daniel-Constantin Mierla
  
  www.twitter.com/miconda  -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda 
  
  Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com 
  
  
  
  ___
  
  SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
  list
  
  [hidden email] 
  
  http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
  
  
  
  
If you reply to this email, your
  message will be added to the discussion below: 

http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153841.html
 
  
  
To unsubscribe from VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the
MI code, click
  here . 
NAML  


-- 
  
  
  

  

  

  

  



yasin-imza-2016.jpg (23K) 





--
View this message in context: 
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153843.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

looking in the code I see the carrierroute module has already rpc
command for reload operations. But there are some other mi commands not
implemented as rpc.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 05/12/2016 11:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> few that are missing can be probably added once we discover them. The
> best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware of a mi
> command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull request :-)
> -- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather easy to
> lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
>> Hello
>> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it 
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
>> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Hello,

few that are missing can be probably added once we discover them. The
best is to open an issue on bug tracker whenever you are aware of a mi
command not implemented in rpc. Even better will be a pull request :-)
-- migrating from mi to rpc should not be complex and rather easy to
lean by looking at other variants with both implementations.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 02/12/2016 16:18, ycaner wrote:
> Hello
> Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it 
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-02 Thread ycaner 
Hello
Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it 
Cheers.



--
View this message in context: 
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code

2016-12-01 Thread Brandon Armstead 
+1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
normalized concept.

:)

Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:17 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> we started discussing about removing MI (so called management interface)
> for very long time, more or less since 2008. The RPC should remain the
> control interface, given its better structure for commands, parameters,
> etc ... MI is custom protocol using a line-oriented communication via
> fifo or socket file with kamailio (e.g., implemented mi_fifo and
> mi_datagram modules). RPC is the alternative, a more standardized
> concept, with better structured format.
>
> I think it's time to set a clear roadmap for doing the removal. Overall,
> it will be easier to maintain the code, right now being duplicated code
> for doing the same operation over MI or RPC, and MI shows its
> limitations (or complexity to deal with) for advanced needs (see the
> discussions about how to provide multi-line value parameters over MI).
>
> So, I want to know if there are many relying on MI directly and they
> still want to keep it, what would be the expected duration they need for
> upgrading their tools to work with RPC interface, other relevant aspects
> people have in favour of mi vs rpc.
>
> I am even willing to do the removal in time befire freezing the 5.0
> branch. We will ensure a clean start of 5.x series.
>
> The main concern from my point of view is kamctl -- but I think we can
> preserve the compatibility for kamctl commands and parameters (so
> command line execution of kamctl will be the same), but the output might
> be different. That's because it should be easy to updated it to
> communicate with jsonrpc-s module, but then it will get json-formatted
> results.
>
> To summarize, two big questions to answer:
>
> a) Are you ok to remove the MI code/commands?
>
> b) If yes to a), are you ok to be done for v5.0?
>
> Not providing feedback will be considered as 'yes' for both questions,
> so **speak up if you want MI to be kept or delay it removal**.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users