RE: flying bumble bee

2000-12-28 Thread Gary Broeder



>
>Seriously though, this is how this urban myth first arose. 

>From my reading I recall the bumble bee was thought too heavy for its wings given the 
>previously understood 
pattern of wing motion. It was discovered using modern high speed photography that the 
wings were moving in 
somewhat of a figure 8 pattern rather than beating up and down thus giving lift in the 
forward stroke as well as 
the backward stroke.

GaryB 



RE: Re: Traction Engine

2000-12-28 Thread Gary Broeder


>Gary,
>
> There is no consideration!!  Be in DH, bring the traction engine-- no
>excuses --I'll  oil it, clean it and buy you lunch!
>
>Geoff.
>>  Gary
>>If you are coming to Diamond head would you consider bringing that traction
>>engine?  While it isn't a locomotive it is live steam and I for one would
>>sure like to see that critter.
>>
>>Salty

Geoff, Salty,
My goodness, I did not realize we had a couple of traction engine fans here. It would 
be a blast to bring it to 
DH but there are 2 problems ( not excuses Geoff but thanks for the offers!) 1, I 
regret that I will not be going 
to DH in Jan. 2, It would present a bit of a problem being carry-on luggage! 
Sacramento next summer would 
be a better bet though!

GaryB  



Re: Traction Engine

2000-12-28 Thread Geoff Spenceley

Gary,

 There is no consideration!!  Be in DH, bring the traction engine-- no
excuses --I'll  oil it, clean it and buy you lunch!

Geoff.

In a message dated 00-12-27 20:48:45 EST, you write:
>
><< The white gas or spirit as you call it will indeed work. I have a model
>traction engine that my Grandfather
> scratch built in about 1905 with just that >>
>  Gary
>If you are coming to Diamond head would you consider bringing that traction
>engine?  While it isn't a locomotive it is live steam and I for one would
>sure like to see that critter.
>
>Salty


 



RE: Kerosene fueling

2000-12-28 Thread Geoff Spenceley

Isn't Susan  a great asset to our list? Lot's of thought provoking ideas.

Anyone for solar heat--the oven  baking cake with a light bulb submitted by
Trent gave me this thought. Of course it wouldn't work inside at DH but
there is always a lot of "hot" air  lurking around--(don't look at me!)

I mentioned once some time ago-sorry for the repeat, that I owned a
vertical boiler freelance logging loco  S/B by a friend. 3-1/2'-3/4" scale:
It had a lava rock bed (firebox) that was kerosene gravity fed  and very
uncomplicated. It was a fantastic runner and the needle valve feed could
control the  fire very well with some practice. It was reasonable safe too,
as it needed the exhaust or blower to keep the fire up.  There was some
danger in carelessness in over feed causing a nice track fire--tho that
NEVER happened to me--Ha you say!! Well just one tiny little fire --once!
Later, the little boiler was damaged  'cos I let a steamer not accustomed
to feed pumps  run it (my fault for lack of instructions)-- they thought
that if the bypass valve was open it would feed water to the boiler!!
There were 50 tubes in that boiler and it took some repair!! There was
still some blow which kept the fire going enough to damage the tubes at the
top of the boiler

OK Susan--your design for a solar run loco please!

Geoff.


As Susan wrote:

>Many thanks to everyone for their comments on and off the list.
>
>I have been cautioned as to kerosene, however I can assure everyone that I
>am not intending to make a fireball in the kitchen (flambeed custards
>perhaps).
>
>Just to widen the discussion for the moment I am listing some fuels with
>comments for you to add to or correct (I have probably missed a few).
>
>
>Wood:
>Not appropriate, in my case, as the prototype was oil fired.
>
>Coal:
>Not appropriate as the prototype was oil fired.
>
>Methanol:
>Low heat generation: Safe(ish) as often used in "toy" steamers e.g. Mammod.
>N.B: Not safe to drink, some health issues.
>
>Ethanol:
>Higher heat generation. Safe(ish) as can be extinguished with water.
>I don't know how practical this is in the UK as the Customs and Excise
>people tax this stuff like you Americans wouldn't believe (or maybe post
>Prohibition you would). Probably better off burning dollar bills or Malt
>Whiskey (the latter would smell better than JP-5 aviation kerosene too).
>Wick burners commonly used.
>Pro: Left overs can be added to the punch bowl. Some health issues from
>over exposure (*hic*).
>
>White Spirit:
>?
>Use in Primus style burner.
>Safety issues?
>
>Petrol (lead free preferred):
>Use in Primus style burner.
>Safety issues?
>
>Kerosene:
>Cannot be extinguished with water.
>Smell problem when used indoors?
>Gravity fed porous "rock" or pressurized vapor burner.
>
>Diesel:
>Similar problems to Kerosene.
>
>Butane:
>Gas of choice?
>Ceramic burner or gas jet(s).
>Problems with maintaining feed pressure when cold.
>
>Propane or Butane/Propane mix:
>Not allowed by G1 society as considered too dangerous.
>Could use camping gaz cartridges placed in tender to supply gas directly
>which might overcome the safety concerns but these are far too large for
>1/32nd scale use.
>
>Electricity:
>Pro: Clean and on demand:
>Con: Huge battery required for any sort of reasonable operating time (like
>truck battery size), or fully electrified track (*sizzle-sizzle*).
>
>Candles:
>Hum, night light power!
>Might be possible to make a multi wick candle using night lights in a
>special holder.
>Can't see how to make it work in my locomotive because of access problems.
>But might be possible for other designs.
>Certainly would chuck out a fair amount of heat. The 24 candles (a token
>amount, I am older than that) on my birthday cake last summer melted the
>chocolate icing in very short order, the cake had to do an emergency stop
>in the freezer before being sliced up. Although in the end it didn't save
>the chocolate (*sticky smile*).
>
>Other Fuels/Energy Sources:



 



Re: Traction Engine

2000-12-28 Thread VR Bass

> << The white gas or spirit as you call it will indeed work. 

I missed the original post here, but I want to comment on some terminology 
here.

"White gas" is unleaded gasoline.  It is used in camping stoves.

"Spirit" is ethyl alcohol.  It goes by the trade name "Everclear" if it's drinkable, 
or "denatured alcohol" if not.  Denaturing involves adding a little methyl 
alcohol, which is toxic and will make you vomit.

Both of these are highly flammable and thus suitable for use in model steam 
engines.  They do have different characteristics, however, and may or may 
not be interchangeable.  I think you should find out (if possible) what the 
engine was designed to use, and stick with that.  You don't want to ruin your 
boiler or fuel system by using the wrong stuff.

Don't forget to add a couple of drops of blue food coloring to the container, 
so you know which is water and which is fuel!

regards,
  -vance-

Vance Bass
Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Small-scale live steam resources: http://www.nmia.com/~vrbass 



Traction Engine

2000-12-28 Thread SaltyChief

In a message dated 00-12-27 20:48:45 EST, you write:

<< The white gas or spirit as you call it will indeed work. I have a model 
traction engine that my Grandfather 
 scratch built in about 1905 with just that >>
  Gary
If you are coming to Diamond head would you consider bringing that traction 
engine?  While it isn't a locomotive it is live steam and I for one would 
sure like to see that critter.

Salty 



Re: Kerosene fueling

2000-12-28 Thread ArtwalkJ98

Susan,

'Toy' steamers whether Mamods or Asters are generally fired by methylated 
spirits ie 'meths' NOT methanol. Meths is just ethanol(& a good dose of 
absorbed water)fouled up according to requirements of local Customs & Excise 
people to prevent the public drinking it & avoiding the crippling tax govs 
like to impose.

I seem to remember a mailing from Capt. Lunkenheimer a while back reporting 
increased vigour from his toys by fuelling with methanol - the incresed 
volatility presumably outweighing the lower calorific value as per the 
butane/propane situation.

GIMRA is a bit neurotic re B/P mixes which personally I think are OK in 
tender gas tanks - but we don't wish to reopen that debate I am sure ! Wait 
till they find out the transpondies have access to isobutane !

Good luck with the kerosene firing - can be done & is done in larger scales. 
But if you feel less adventurous, meths & the various gas firing arrangements 
are established procedures.


Art Walker, Guildford, England 



RE: Kerosene fueling

2000-12-28 Thread Susan Parker

Hi,

Many thanks to everyone for their comments on and off the list.

I have been cautioned as to kerosene, however I can assure everyone that I 
am not intending to make a fireball in the kitchen (flambeed custards 
perhaps).

Just to widen the discussion for the moment I am listing some fuels with 
comments for you to add to or correct (I have probably missed a few).


Wood:
Not appropriate, in my case, as the prototype was oil fired.

Coal:
Not appropriate as the prototype was oil fired.

Methanol:
Low heat generation: Safe(ish) as often used in "toy" steamers e.g. Mammod.
N.B: Not safe to drink, some health issues.

Ethanol:
Higher heat generation. Safe(ish) as can be extinguished with water.
I don't know how practical this is in the UK as the Customs and Excise 
people tax this stuff like you Americans wouldn't believe (or maybe post 
Prohibition you would). Probably better off burning dollar bills or Malt 
Whiskey (the latter would smell better than JP-5 aviation kerosene too).
Wick burners commonly used.
Pro: Left overs can be added to the punch bowl. Some health issues from 
over exposure (*hic*).

White Spirit:
?
Use in Primus style burner.
Safety issues?

Petrol (lead free preferred):
Use in Primus style burner.
Safety issues?

Kerosene:
Cannot be extinguished with water.
Smell problem when used indoors?
Gravity fed porous "rock" or pressurized vapor burner.

Diesel:
Similar problems to Kerosene.

Butane:
Gas of choice?
Ceramic burner or gas jet(s).
Problems with maintaining feed pressure when cold.

Propane or Butane/Propane mix:
Not allowed by G1 society as considered too dangerous.
Could use camping gaz cartridges placed in tender to supply gas directly 
which might overcome the safety concerns but these are far too large for 
1/32nd scale use.

Electricity:
Pro: Clean and on demand:
Con: Huge battery required for any sort of reasonable operating time (like 
truck battery size), or fully electrified track (*sizzle-sizzle*).

Candles:
Hum, night light power!
Might be possible to make a multi wick candle using night lights in a 
special holder.
Can't see how to make it work in my locomotive because of access problems. 
But might be possible for other designs.
Certainly would chuck out a fair amount of heat. The 24 candles (a token 
amount, I am older than that) on my birthday cake last summer melted the 
chocolate icing in very short order, the cake had to do an emergency stop 
in the freezer before being sliced up. Although in the end it didn't save 
the chocolate (*sticky smile*).

Other Fuels/Energy Sources:
?

What have I missed?

Comments?

I will be buying a foam fire extinguisher and fire blanket before trying 
any of the above. Should really have them for the kitchen anyway (not that 
I do any deep fat frying).

And yes, I will let the list know of any progress. Don't hold you breaths 
though, as I am just about to start with the front 4 wheel truck. It is my 
intention to put up a web site at some point, and to include source 
material (e.g. wheel tire profiles) as well as drawings and pictures. The 
above fuel list could well be a page in it's own right.

Best wishes for the New Year,
Susan.