Re: Re[2]: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Tag Gorton



On 23/8/04 9:12 pm, "Bert & Edmunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Dave.
> 
>  A friend and myself both run Accucraft C-16s among others. we both
>  have the same RC unit. my engine runs well Manfreds does not.  We
>  swapped various parts to try to find the reason. I dropped to a cheap
>  27Mhz rc. my loco still performed well. The other one using my radio
>  did not. I feel it has not so much to do with the radio gear as with
>  the individual loco. I am convinced that cheap glitching is less
>  annoying than expensive glitching. (Do you always get what you pay
>  for?)  We are now looking for a reason which is probably much less
>  complicated than we think and probably the tea lady has better
>  chances of solving the problem than we have. After all she knows
>  nothing about radio gear.  We have also found that often models play
>  up at the same spot. If we have two weak radios they only play up at
>  distinct points.stronger instalations have no problems. We have
>  almost written it off as whitchcraft.

Does one of you use rechargables instead of dry batteries? Other than a
locomotive supplied with them on purchase I always use cheap dry batteries
which can make a significant difference.
-- 
Tag Gorton
Editor
Garden Rail
Atlantic Publishers
http://www.atlanticpublishers.com/GR.html
Editor
16mm Today
http://www.16mmngmodellers.org.uk/

 


Re: glitching and investment

2004-08-23 Thread Geoff Spenceley
 Thanks Vance,

Well said!  -and  not clumsily!!   I must admit that  I love the fiddling
despite my clumsility! If a new  engine or kit performs  perfectly, I feel
cheated! Is that why I like Aster??  There I go!

Geoff.



 Let  us all  try and be helpful in this hobby and not PICK, PICK!!
>> It gets us nowhere ...
>
>Geoff, that rarely stops most of us...
>
>> ... and makes me madder than hell!
>
>... but this will stop me in my tracks immediately!
>
>You're absolutely right that Aster have earned our highest respect for
>their contributions
>to the hobby. (Though, as a 1:20 fan, I might grouse a little about them
>only producing
>one loco in my scale over the course of 30 years.)
>
>My point, alas clumsily made, was just that even an Aster requires some
>fiddling when
>new. I guess that's just the nature of what is one of the few hand-built
>products you can
>still buy. We should celebrate that fact, rather than complaining that
>they still have
>some human qualities left in them!
>
>
>-vance-
>
>If you were here, we'd be running trains by now.
>
>


 


Re: glitching and investment

2004-08-23 Thread Vance Bass
> Let  us all  try and be helpful in this hobby and not PICK, PICK!!
> It gets us nowhere ... 

Geoff, that rarely stops most of us...

> ... and makes me madder than hell!

... but this will stop me in my tracks immediately!

You're absolutely right that Aster have earned our highest respect for their 
contributions 
to the hobby. (Though, as a 1:20 fan, I might grouse a little about them only 
producing 
one loco in my scale over the course of 30 years.)

My point, alas clumsily made, was just that even an Aster requires some fiddling when 
new. I guess that's just the nature of what is one of the few hand-built products you 
can 
still buy. We should celebrate that fact, rather than complaining that they still have 
some human qualities left in them!


-vance-

If you were here, we'd be running trains by now.

 


RE: Re[2]: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Ciambrone, Steve @ OS
On this side of the Atlantic we call it Black Magic, the guys who can solve
it call it a Black Art.

Might try moving everything except the servos to the tender or a following
freight or passenger car.  Distance from the moving parts can help
considerably.

I have gained my experience from flying electric R/C planes, which the
glitching can be the death of a model.

Steve



We have
 almost written it off as whitchcraft.

 Bert in the Austrian (bewitched?) Alps.


-
Bert &  Edmunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


Re: glitching and investment

2004-08-23 Thread Geoff Spenceley
Vance,

 You can't convince me on that!! I think Aster are the best in the 1/32
scale. An alcohol or coal fired loco always needs a little more fiddling
with the required fan and blower as opposed to butane fired locos. Why do
some hobbyists always like to make cracks against Aster--they have done a
GREAT job for the hobby over many years and Accucraft is attempting to
follow their example and that is good too. Let  us all  try and be helpful
in this hobby and not PICK, PICK!! It gets us nowhere and makes me madder
than hell!

Geoff.


>
>This is a pearl of wisdom. Yet the people who buy Asters seem to have to
>fiddle with
>them as much as (or more than?) the Accucraft owners to get a new
>locomotive running
>smoothly. Who got the value for their money, I wonder?
>
>
>-vance-
>
>If you were here, we'd be running trains by now.
>
>


 


Re: glitching and investment

2004-08-23 Thread Vance Bass
> I am convinced that cheap glitching is less annoying than expensive glitching.

This is a pearl of wisdom. Yet the people who buy Asters seem to have to fiddle with 
them as much as (or more than?) the Accucraft owners to get a new locomotive running 
smoothly. Who got the value for their money, I wonder?


-vance-

If you were here, we'd be running trains by now.

 


Re[2]: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Bert & Edmunda
 Dave.

 A friend and myself both run Accucraft C-16s among others. we both
 have the same RC unit. my engine runs well Manfreds does not.  We
 swapped various parts to try to find the reason. I dropped to a cheap
 27Mhz rc. my loco still performed well. The other one using my radio
 did not. I feel it has not so much to do with the radio gear as with
 the individual loco. I am convinced that cheap glitching is less
 annoying than expensive glitching. (Do you always get what you pay
 for?)  We are now looking for a reason which is probably much less
 complicated than we think and probably the tea lady has better
 chances of solving the problem than we have. After all she knows
 nothing about radio gear.  We have also found that often models play
 up at the same spot. If we have two weak radios they only play up at
 distinct points.stronger instalations have no problems. We have
 almost written it off as whitchcraft.

 Bert in the Austrian (bewitched?) Alps.


-
Bert &  Edmunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


Re: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Dave Sykes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to continue running my engine manually, or wait for my
friend to complete his high tech based digital R/C system...
   

Henner,
There is a system available from RCS (_http://www.rcs-rc.com_ 
(http://www.rcs-rc.com) ) that is digital and  glitch-free.  RCS' owner, Tony Walsham, 
insists that it won't ever allow  glitching.  I've heard from a few folks who use it 
that it works as  advertised.

Pete
 

 

I have been using Tony Walsham's RCS for about four years in the 
following engines.
(2) K-27's  (2) C-21's   (1) C-16  (1) shay
All accucraft and they do NOT glitch. You get what you pay for.
Dave  PFRR



Re: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Mike Chaney
Tag confessed:-

> The controller is so small that I was
> working mine from my pocket just to show off! This did however draw the
> suggestion that it would not be a good idea to do it this way at mixed
> gender meetings.:-)

Yes, we have the occasional RCS pocket billiard player at our meetings (:>)

Mike
 


Re: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Tag Gorton



On 23/8/04 4:26 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> I have to continue running my engine manually, or wait for my
>>  friend to complete his high tech based digital R/C system...
> 
> Henner,
>  
> There is a system available from RCS (_http://www.rcs-rc.com_
> (http://www.rcs-rc.com) ) that is digital and  glitch-free.  RCS' owner, Tony
> Walsham, 
> insists that it won't ever allow  glitching.  I've heard from a few folks who
> use it 
> that it works as  advertised.

I should like to second this recommendation - ideal for really serious
glitching probs - also if you have room for a small speaker you can add
digital sound effects such as a bell. The controller is so small that I was
working mine from my pocket just to show off! This did however draw the
suggestion that it would not be a good idea to do it this way at mixed
gender meetings.:-)

-- 
Tag Gorton
Editor
Garden Rail
Atlantic Publishers
http://www.atlanticpublishers.com/GR.html
Editor
16mm Today
http://www.16mmngmodellers.org.uk/

 


Re: sslivesteam2-Digest - Number 320

2004-08-23 Thread Pthornto
> I have to continue running my engine manually, or wait for my
>  friend to complete his high tech based digital R/C system...

Henner,
 
There is a system available from RCS (_http://www.rcs-rc.com_ 
(http://www.rcs-rc.com) ) that is digital and  glitch-free.  RCS' owner, Tony Walsham, 
insists that it won't ever allow  glitching.  I've heard from a few folks who use it 
that it works as  advertised.

Pete
  


Re: More glitching

2004-08-23 Thread EMartin187
In a message dated 8/22/2004 6:32:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I talked to the guys at the local r/c shop, who sell mostly planes and
>cars, when I was buying servos for my first conversion.  They told >me
about metal-to-metal glitching - apparently, any metal contacts >that are
loose (think of your loco-tender coupler, side rods, wheel >bearings, or the
truck pivots,) cause glitching and worsen >performance.

>While at the store, note that most servo connection parts are nylon >or
similar plastic.  No metal.  Trains are obviously a hopeless case in >terms
of eradicating random metal-to-metal contacts!

I tested the radio system with the engine stopped and everything was fine.
As soon as I touched one of the metal parts with a scew driver or moved the
engine, all hell broke loose: The servo tried to twist itself out of its
bracket ! Obviously my locomotive is the worst case scenario. The frame and
superstructure are mainly wood with the engine exposed in the middle. So all
the moving and rubbing metal parts are completely unshielded. On a "normal"
live steamer the bulk of the locomotive like boiler, cab, running board are
"static" and seem to shield the moving parts. Anyway, I tried several of the
tricks mentioned in the glitching thread, but nothing worked. I even tried
to ground the receiver to the steam engine/boiler...
Bottom line: 19th century mechanical designs and 20th century radio control
don't match. I have to continue running my engine manually, or wait for my
friend to complete his high tech based digital R/C system...

Henner
All is not lost with conventional R/C.  My brother and I run 4 R/C Live 
Steamers using FM, 75 mhz radios.  My RH Fowler and my brothers Accucraft C-16 are 
both 2 channel using the glitch buster from Sulpher Springs, set on the max 
setting.  They both run very well.  We each also have single channel R/C setups 
in Bantams, which run quite well.  However, glitching in our area appears to 
be environmental, time of day related.  In the earlier part of the morning is 
the least glitching.  That's when we run most often.

The best antenna we have found is the 75mhz "Black Kat" antenna from Azarr at 
www.ecubedrc.com, at a cost of $10.00 US.  In discussions with Azarr, he also 
told me to shorten the transmitter antenna while standing near the loco 
because the receiver can get overloaded.  That seems to work.

We also run a number of onboard battery, R/C, sound equipped electric powered 
locos and railbusses with chokes on the motors to reduce noise.  But that's 
another story.

So R/C does work, but not without some effort.  R/C is essential for us 
because we run on the ground and my railway has grades up to 8%.  So we have to 
control at least the throttle on our locos.  

Hope this info helps.
Earl Martin