[SSSD] [sssd PR#5474][comment] spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

2021-01-27 Thread alexey-tikhonov
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474
Title: #5474: spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

alexey-tikhonov commented:
"""
There was also a comment in sssd.spec.in that I would like to keep:
```
# p11tool from the gnutls-utils package and softhsm2-util from the softhsm 
package
# are needed to prepare the data needed for the p11_child Smartcard tests.
# Since p11_child only looks at slots with are flagged as 'removable'
# softhsm version 2.1.0 or higher is needed.
BuildRequires: gnutls-utils
BuildRequires: softhsm >= 2.1.0
```

(and probably other comments that I could miss)
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474#issuecomment-768298922
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#5474][comment] spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

2021-01-27 Thread sumit-bose
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474
Title: #5474: spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

sumit-bose commented:
"""
> 
> Yes. i also wonder if we need to keep all versioned requires and conflicts 
> like:
> 
> ```
> BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel >= 1.0.0
> ...
> Conflicts: selinux-policy < 3.10.0-46
> Conflicts: sssd < 1.10.0-8%{?dist}.beta2
> ```
> 
> Obviously, these versions are long gone.
> 
> @sumit-bose do you have an opinion on this?

Hi,

I think the conflicts can be removed. Since we need `BuildRequires: 
libcmocka-devel` anyway I would keep the version as well.

bye,
Sumit
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474#issuecomment-768213357
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#5365][synchronized] Translations update from Weblate

2021-01-27 Thread weblate
   URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5365
Author: weblate
 Title: #5365: Translations update from Weblate
Action: synchronized

To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/5365/head:pr5365
git checkout pr5365
From 355bb8dda244b5789ca45b60542642a262408202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Weblate 
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:38:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translated using Weblate (Finnish)

Currently translated at 1.1% (31 of 2671 strings)

Translation: SSSD/sssd-manpage
Translate-URL: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/sssd/sssd-manpage-master/fi/
---
 src/man/po/fi.po | 15 ---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/man/po/fi.po b/src/man/po/fi.po
index 1cd7f5ecdb..432274ea3d 100644
--- a/src/man/po/fi.po
+++ b/src/man/po/fi.po
@@ -4,15 +4,16 @@ msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: sssd-docs 2.3.0\n"
 "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: sssd-de...@redhat.com\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2020-05-19 12:09+0200\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-03-24 08:46-0400\n"
-"Last-Translator: Toni Rantala \n"
-"Language-Team: Finnish\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-01-12 16:38+\n"
+"Last-Translator: Jan Kuparinen \n"
+"Language-Team: Finnish \n"
 "Language: fi\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1)\n"
-"X-Generator: Zanata 4.6.2\n"
+"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=n != 1;\n"
+"X-Generator: Weblate 4.4\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: 
 #: sss_groupmod.8.xml:5 sssd.conf.5.xml:5 sssd-ldap.5.xml:5 pam_sss.8.xml:5
@@ -1159,7 +1160,7 @@ msgstr ""
 #. 
 #: sssd.conf.5.xml:764
 msgid "offline_timeout (integer)"
-msgstr "offline_timeout (integer)"
+msgstr "offline_timeout (integeri)"
 
 #. type: Content of:
 #. 
@@ -1255,7 +1256,7 @@ msgstr ""
 #. 
 #: sssd.conf.5.xml:840
 msgid "enum_cache_timeout (integer)"
-msgstr "enum_cache_timeout (integer)"
+msgstr "enum_cache_timeout (integeri)"
 
 #. type: Content of:
 #. 
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] [sssd PR#5474][comment] spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

2021-01-27 Thread pbrezina
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474
Title: #5474: spec: synchronize with Fedora 34 spec file

pbrezina commented:
"""
> Hi,
> 
> besides questions I raised in comments, I have following questions/remarks:
> 
> 1. Don't we need `Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig` in `%package client`?

This is done by rpm macros at the end: `%ldconfig_postun client`

> 2. I don't think we can completely skip all the changes done to the 
> upstream spec-file.
>I think it makes sense to include at least: PRs #5137, #1039, #1008 
> and commits 
> [e698d53](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/commit/e698d53e0ddd3c2778e04fd8e405f8c0cee0a766),
>  
> [7fbc7e3](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/commit/7fbc7e3ffb7a5c0090bb2091011762dabf1f512f)
>  ... (and I could miss something)
>Otherwise it would be RHEL9 regressions.

Those were not in the rawhide spec file but I'll look into it.

> 3. would be good to include patches to manage build of implicit files 
> provider and sssd-polkit-rules.

polkit rules yes, but I would like to see a design for the files provider first.

> Additionally we need to review lists of `BuildRequires` and `Requires` to 
> avoid unnecessary deps...

Yes. i also wonder if we need to keep all versioned requires and conflicts like:

```
BuildRequires: libcmocka-devel >= 1.0.0
...
Conflicts: selinux-policy < 3.10.0-46
Conflicts: sssd < 1.10.0-8%{?dist}.beta2
```
Obviously, these versions are long gone.

@sumit-bose do you have an opinion on this?

"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5474#issuecomment-768187382
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org