[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On (17/08/16 16:32), Petr Cech wrote: >On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: >> On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> > On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: >> > > > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: >> > > > > Updated patch attached. >> > > > > >> > > > > Kind regards, >> > > > > Justin Stephenson >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, Justin. >> > > > >> > > > Obviously ACK. >> > > >> > > Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look >> > > awkward to anyone else? >> > >> > Yes. How about: >> > >> > Check that SSSD is running and that the InfoPipe responder is enabled. >> > Make sure "ifp" is listed in "services" option in sssd.conf. >> Agreed, please see updated patch. > >ACK obviously. > master: * 9b86f8f3c07af6fd3d2b08ff66cf9dcce61e7abf LS ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look awkward to anyone else? Yes. How about: Check that SSSD is running and that the InfoPipe responder is enabled. Make sure "ifp" is listed in "services" option in sssd.conf. Agreed, please see updated patch. Ack, thank you. ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look awkward to anyone else? Yes. How about: Check that SSSD is running and that the InfoPipe responder is enabled. Make sure "ifp" is listed in "services" option in sssd.conf. Agreed, please see updated patch. ACK obviously. -- Petr^4 Čech ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Updated patch attached.
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
Thanks, Justin.
Obviously ACK.
Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look
awkward to anyone else?
Yes. How about:
Check that SSSD is running and that the InfoPipe responder is enabled.
Make sure "ifp" is listed in "services" option in sssd.conf.
Agreed, please see updated patch.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
>From 1bdcace2e2d8375b8efed822b2cfc7e7442245ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..e8f6efd110f2944aac88a84b0bccef8660ea 100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+ "the InfoPipe responder is enabled. " \
+ "Make sure 'ifp' is listed in the " \
+ "'services' option in sssd.conf.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
--
2.7.4
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin Stephenson Thanks, Justin. Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look awkward to anyone else? Yes. How about: Check that SSSD is running and that the InfoPipe responder is enabled. Make sure "ifp" is listed in "services" option in sssd.conf. ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: > > Updated patch attached. > > > > Kind regards, > > Justin Stephenson > > Thanks, Justin. > > Obviously ACK. Umm..I'm by no means a UI designer, but does HINT in ALL CAPS look awkward to anyone else? ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Updated patch attached.
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
Thanks, Justin.
Obviously ACK.
On 08/16/2016 02:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
>From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the
service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
Here is a comment from the author of previous message.
05:26 < lslebodn> pbrezina: Do you have any coment to the patch
"SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is disabled" ?
05:26 < lslebodn> becuase I plan to push it :-)
05:28 < pbrezina> lslebodn, I still think that the original message
is more accurate, but I don't oppose.
I tent to agree.
I would reserve the original message and wrote a "HINT" in next line.
Any objection for such compromise?
LS
0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d-v2.patch
From 49fd8ff5100f38dbee9b873120b703d2499d09d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..33ba6404e7d0b8116aa3df6bfefa37a3dd3c
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+ "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n" \
+ "HINT: Add ifp to the services list " \
+ "in sssd.conf and restart sssd.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
-- 2.7.4
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
Updated patch attached.
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
On 08/16/2016 02:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
>From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
Here is a comment from the author of previous message.
05:26 < lslebodn> pbrezina: Do you have any coment to the patch
"SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is disabled" ?
05:26 < lslebodn> becuase I plan to push it :-)
05:28 < pbrezina> lslebodn, I still think that the original message
is more accurate, but I don't oppose.
I tent to agree.
I would reserve the original message and wrote a "HINT" in next line.
Any objection for such compromise?
LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
>From 49fd8ff5100f38dbee9b873120b703d2499d09d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..33ba6404e7d0b8116aa3df6bfefa37a3dd3c 100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+ "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n" \
+ "HINT: Add ifp to the services list " \
+ "in sssd.conf and restart sssd.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
--
2.7.4
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/16/2016 08:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
Here is a comment from the author of previous message.
05:26 < lslebodn> pbrezina: Do you have any coment to the patch
"SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is disabled" ?
05:26 < lslebodn> becuase I plan to push it :-)
05:28 < pbrezina> lslebodn, I still think that the original message
is more accurate, but I don't oppose.
I tent to agree.
I would reserve the original message and wrote a "HINT" in next line.
+1
Any objection for such compromise?
LS
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote:
>Simple error message patch, resolves
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Justin Stephenson
>
>From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Justin Stephenson
>Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
> disabled
>
>Resolves:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
>---
> src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
>index
>e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
> 100644
>--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
>+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
>@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
> #include "util/util.h"
> #include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
>
>-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
>- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
>+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the service" \
>+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
Here is a comment from the author of previous message.
05:26 < lslebodn> pbrezina: Do you have any coment to the patch
"SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is disabled" ?
05:26 < lslebodn> becuase I plan to push it :-)
05:28 < pbrezina> lslebodn, I still think that the original message
is more accurate, but I don't oppose.
I tent to agree.
I would reserve the original message and wrote a "HINT" in next line.
Any objection for such compromise?
LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
Thanks Petr!
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
On 08/15/2016 02:13 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/15/2016 07:58 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d.patch
From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the
service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
Hello Justin,
thanks for patch. New message is understandable for me.
I will try to compile it and then I will ACK to the patch.
CI locally passed.
=> ACK
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/15/2016 07:58 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d.patch
From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the
service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
Hello Justin,
thanks for patch. New message is understandable for me.
I will try to compile it and then I will ACK to the patch.
CI locally passed.
=> ACK
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder
On 08/12/2016 06:24 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
0001-SSSCTL-More-helpful-error-message-when-InfoPipe-is-d.patch
From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stephenson
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index
e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
struct sssctl_sifp_data {
sss_sifp_ctx *sifp;
Hello Justin,
thanks for patch. New message is understandable for me.
I will try to compile it and then I will ACK to the patch.
Regards
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
