Re: [Standards] private storage revisited

2007-07-07 Thread Ian Paterson

Ian Paterson wrote:

Wow! consensus on Personal Publishing! I'm off to celebrate :-) :-)


Well, so far only a consensus of 3 people who disagreed in the past.

- Ian



Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Getting a User's Attention

2007-07-07 Thread Unnikrishnan V

We do this in the below way :

38632DAB-0E5F-4F9C-9F5B-D0DA6CB07688
xmlns="private:emot">emot-shout.au

This 'll give a buzz +  play the au file at the other side. Another is, we
dont send  in this message because already a chat is going and we just
want to play the sound and give a window shake.

thanx
unni

On 7/6/07, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Saturday 07 July 2007 01:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> If the message contains only the attention element (as it certainly
> should), then the recipient can simply ignore it. It's not necessary to
> return an error, IMHO.

To some extent though I'd like to know if I prod someone whose client
claimed
to support the feature, and for some reason they don't get prodded.

On the other hand you can solve the same problem by telling some users you
support it and other users you don't.  So those other users don't even get
the button in the first place.

Daniel