[Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoBou4ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzvbACg1gLJ/JRGaKlKlrTxaGCkti6K /C4An2YRZT5qe1ri0IimQYw9uC/Ka2mB =o4ea -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
ons 2009-05-06 klockan 08:47 -0600 skrev Peter Saint-Andre: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Is there a preferred way to setup e2e security, rather than using Jingle sessions? Will the XTLS proposal be worked on instead? //Marcus Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoBou4ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzvbACg1gLJ/JRGaKlKlrTxaGCkti6K /C4An2YRZT5qe1ri0IimQYw9uC/Ka2mB =o4ea -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/6/09 9:15 AM, Marcus Lundblad wrote: ons 2009-05-06 klockan 08:47 -0600 skrev Peter Saint-Andre: Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Is there a preferred way to setup e2e security, rather than using Jingle sessions? Will the XTLS proposal be worked on instead? The most up-to-date thinking is here: http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-01.html Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoBqqoACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyMtACgjIhHXThP4gpn9nt3IGWcN6Pk OQIAniUp42n+r93DGLAj8SWnFZ4U5rxL =6i5J -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 07:47:10 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Wasn't there a plan to have Link-Local Messaging depend on XEP-246? -Justin
Re: [Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/6/09 9:32 AM, Justin Karneges wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 07:47:10 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Wasn't there a plan to have Link-Local Messaging depend on XEP-246? I think that was just us getting spec-happy. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoBu2sACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwDKwCgn1C/PV2RK5LfAkZY6mSCZFUr d4UAn2ujgJtQI1P0cP3VqAx3ULVEPMx+ =ceRu -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Standards] Fwd: [Council] Minutes for May 6
FYI: -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:31 PM Subject: [Council] Minutes for May 6 Role call: All present Agenda bashing: None. - - XEP-0166: Jingle - - XEP-0167: Jingle RTP Sessions - - XEP-0176: Jingle ICE-UDP Transport Method - - XEP-0177: Jingle Raw UDP Transport Method advance to Draft? Feedback is still coming in, so we'll punt on these for a fortnight, and schedule them again later. - - XEP-0256: Last Activity in Presence advance to Draft? Consensus for advancing to Draft. - - before June 30 we need to define 2010 compliance suites to replace XEP-0242 and XEP-0243 -- objections to copying those XEPs (with new numbers) as starting points? Consensus to start from the current suites, although there's an open question of whether these are doing any good Any other business: None Date of next meeting: 20th May Best, /K
[Standards] DRAFT: XEP-0256 (Last Activity in Presence)
Version 1.0 of XEP-0256 (Last Activity in Presence) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines a way to use the Last Activity extension in XMPP presence notifications. Changelog: Per a vote of the XMPP Council, advanced specification to Draft. (psa) Diff: http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0256.xml?r1=3076r2=3129 URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0256.html
Re: [Standards] XEPs 246 + 247 (end-to-end streams)
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 5/6/09 9:32 AM, Justin Karneges wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 07:47:10 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Dirk Meyer and I think that we no longer need XEP-0246 (End-to-End XML Streams) and XEP-0247 (Jingle XML Streams). Are there any objections to simply retracting these? Wasn't there a plan to have Link-Local Messaging depend on XEP-246? I think that was just us getting spec-happy. I would be a nice idea if we would have gone with XEP-0247 so it can share spec with link-local. But link-local is now the only one using this kind of stream and also in draft state. Dirk -- I have yet to meet a C compiler that is more friendly and easier to use than eating soup with a knife.
[Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0161 (Abuse Reporting)
XEP-0161 (Abuse Reporting) has been Deferred because of inactivity. Abstract: This document specifies an XMPP protocol extension for reporting abusive XMPP stanzas. URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0161.html If and when a new revision of this XEP is published, its status will be changed back to Experimental.
