Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/7/09 5:12 PM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > 2009/7/8 XMPP Extensions Editor : >> Version 0.2 of XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer) has been released. >> >> Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables >> a server to redirect connections from one connection manager or server node >> to another. >> >> Changelog: Rewritten to focus on the connection transfer use case only. (fj) >> >> Diff: >> http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0051.xml?%40diffMode=u&%40diffWrap=s&r1=320&r2=3312&u=3&ignore=&k= >> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0051.html >> >> > > Wow, this is really old spec... and I think not really useful. > see-other-host stream error does the exactly same job. Yes, it's ancient. I'll let Florian explain the reasoning behind resurrecting it. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpT/CkACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzB/wCdFlr3ZmcCmL/ltWZQ1Ts/2MiR VCYAoOY5DafmP5QgDeHYp7ajLFLD+9qg =DMON -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer)
2009/7/8 XMPP Extensions Editor : > Version 0.2 of XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer) has been released. > > Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables > a server to redirect connections from one connection manager or server node > to another. > > Changelog: Rewritten to focus on the connection transfer use case only. (fj) > > Diff: > http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0051.xml?%40diffMode=u&%40diffWrap=s&r1=320&r2=3312&u=3&ignore=&k= > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0051.html > > Wow, this is really old spec... and I think not really useful. see-other-host stream error does the exactly same job.
[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer)
Version 0.2 of XEP-0051 (Connection Transfer) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables a server to redirect connections from one connection manager or server node to another. Changelog: Rewritten to focus on the connection transfer use case only. (fj) Diff: http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0051.xml?%40diffMode=u&%40diffWrap=s&r1=320&r2=3312&u=3&ignore=&k= URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0051.html
Re: [Standards] Issue tracker for XEPs?
2009/7/7 Peter Saint-Andre : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/7/09 1:06 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: >> 2009/7/7 Peter Saint-Andre : > Sure. Indeed I prefer it. I just figured I'd test the issue tracker > since that's what the IETF Tools Team has given us. :) Have you thought about setting up an issue tracker for XEPs? I think it would be very nice. Various small problems can get easily forgotten and lost in the amount of emails posted in threads dedicated to bigger ones. >>> We have a license from Atlassian for FishEye, so I'm sure we could use >>> Jira for that. Want to help set it up? :) >> >> I've just set Jira up at work, I'm happy to give it a go if you want. > > Sure, sounds good. Thanks! > > Peter > I'd also be glad to help, in case there is something I can help with. :) But as it seems quite easy for one person and I have no experience with it, I'll probably help more just by filling it. :D
Re: [Standards] Issue tracker for XEPs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/7/09 1:06 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > 2009/7/7 Peter Saint-Andre : Sure. Indeed I prefer it. I just figured I'd test the issue tracker since that's what the IETF Tools Team has given us. :) >>> Have you thought about setting up an issue tracker for XEPs? >>> I think it would be very nice. Various small problems can get easily >>> forgotten and lost in the amount of emails posted in threads dedicated >>> to bigger ones. >> We have a license from Atlassian for FishEye, so I'm sure we could use >> Jira for that. Want to help set it up? :) > > I've just set Jira up at work, I'm happy to give it a go if you want. Sure, sounds good. Thanks! Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpTncoACgkQNL8k5A2w/vy8jQCcCg/QupBqDwNO7UA2Bt12we9e zIcAoIQtR41M35ztRFGTwvPtcl6xeo9t =sqF4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] Issue tracker for XEPs?
2009/7/7 Peter Saint-Andre : >>> Sure. Indeed I prefer it. I just figured I'd test the issue tracker >>> since that's what the IETF Tools Team has given us. :) >> Have you thought about setting up an issue tracker for XEPs? >> I think it would be very nice. Various small problems can get easily >> forgotten and lost in the amount of emails posted in threads dedicated >> to bigger ones. > We have a license from Atlassian for FishEye, so I'm sure we could use > Jira for that. Want to help set it up? :) I've just set Jira up at work, I'm happy to give it a go if you want. /K
Re: [Standards] Issue tracker for XEPs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/7/09 12:55 PM, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote: > Dne 7. červenec 2009 20:42 Peter Saint-Andre napsal(a): >>> btw, is it OK to respond to the tickets on this list instead of >>> commenting them directly? >> Sure. Indeed I prefer it. I just figured I'd test the issue tracker >> since that's what the IETF Tools Team has given us. :) >> >> Peter >> > > Have you thought about setting up an issue tracker for XEPs? > I think it would be very nice. Various small problems can get easily > forgotten and lost in the amount of emails posted in threads dedicated > to bigger ones. We have a license from Atlassian for FishEye, so I'm sure we could use Jira for that. Want to help set it up? :) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpTm04ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwi0gCgz5ce6P7N1j02TD7rfrw7Jizh KaIAoO83RtYlKXSn7seJJLlq1IxhnY0d =4d3I -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Standards] XEP-0051 - Renew that spec?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/7/09 12:41 PM, Florian Jensen wrote: > I was just looking for options on how to "loadbalance" / transfer > connections within a cluster and stumbled upon XEP-0051. I think this > would be very useful, however, only the second part of it. I agree that the two parts of that spec are very different. Perhaps you could take XEP-0051, remove the first part, update the namespaces and examples, write some better explanatory and introductory text, and submit it as a new XEP proposal? :) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpTmjAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzokACeJmAk0qXK6qK2ukkYLP1CQc/g UiEAoPFVTGwG7AG/x6UdS6k0/fYvAaWc =6YZM -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Standards] Issue tracker for XEPs?
Dne 7. červenec 2009 20:42 Peter Saint-Andre napsal(a): > >> btw, is it OK to respond to the tickets on this list instead of >> commenting them directly? > > Sure. Indeed I prefer it. I just figured I'd test the issue tracker > since that's what the IETF Tools Team has given us. :) > > Peter > Have you thought about setting up an issue tracker for XEPs? I think it would be very nice. Various small problems can get easily forgotten and lost in the amount of emails posted in threads dedicated to bigger ones.
[Standards] REMINDER: free XMPP Summit, San Jose, CA, July 20-21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is just a reminder that the XSF will hold an XMPP Summit on July 20-21 in San Jose, California. This is the premier gathering of XMPP geeks on the planet, held twice a year (once in North America and once in Europe). If you want to participate in part or all of the Summit, please post to the sum...@xmpp.org list. Details here: http://xmpp.org/summit/summit7.shtml Thanks! Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpTmT8ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyExwCdEFWzQUuQXtf2M/Cf/qINFjNy 7egAn1trU9lTU//uKwDlgFBNU6n8wXmo =NXut -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Standards] XEP-0051 - Renew that spec?
Hi, I was just looking for options on how to "loadbalance" / transfer connections within a cluster and stumbled upon XEP-0051. I think this would be very useful, however, only the second part of it. In an age of more and more clusters, this could be an essential part of cluster management. Greets, Florian Jensen
