Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text)

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for working so diligently to incorporate the mass of feedback you
received recently. Given the scope of the changes, you might want to
give folks more than just a few days to provide feedback before pushing
out 0.4 (perhaps a week from now?). I know I plan to review it again
this week.

Peter

On 7/7/12 4:48 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Regarding www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html
> 
> 
> There were so many comments and suggestions that I decided a 0.3 interim
> was useful.  I intend to publish a 0.4 in the next few days, hopefully
> just minor corrections, and possibly an extra usage example or two
> added.  I will then request LAST CALL.
> 
> Comments and suggestions?
> Did your concern get addressed?
> Any issues that I missed?
> Any areas that you would like to see clarified or improved? 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On 2012-07-07 5:18 PM, "XMPP Extensions Editor"  > wrote:
> 
> Version 0.3 of XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) has been released.
> 
> Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted
> in-band over an XMPP session.
> 
> Changelog: Edits recommended from public discussion. (MDR)
> 
> Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0301/diff/0.2/vs/0.3
> 
> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html
> 

Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text)

[Mark Rejhon]

Regarding www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html

There were so many comments and suggestions that I decided a 0.3 interim
was useful.  I intend to publish a 0.4 in the next few days, hopefully just
minor corrections, and possibly an extra usage example or two added.  I
will then request LAST CALL.

Comments and suggestions?
Did your concern get addressed?
Any issues that I missed?
Any areas that you would like to see clarified or improved?

Thanks
On 2012-07-07 5:18 PM, "XMPP Extensions Editor"  wrote:

> Version 0.3 of XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) has been released.
>
> Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted in-band
> over an XMPP session.
>
> Changelog: Edits recommended from public discussion. (MDR)
>
> Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0301/diff/0.2/vs/0.3
>
> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html
>
>

[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text)

[XMPP Extensions Editor]

Version 0.3 of XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) has been released.

Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted in-band over 
an XMPP session.

Changelog: Edits recommended from public discussion. (MDR)

Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0301/diff/0.2/vs/0.3

URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html

[Standards] XEP-0016: managing default privacy list with multiple connected resources

[Andrew Biggs]

Hi there,

I was wondering if someone might be able to tell me how a server should 
respond to the following case:


(0) Start with no active connections for f...@acme.com.
(1) A client connects as f...@acme.com/a.
(2) Via f...@acme.com/a, client declines the default privacy list, as in 
example 20 of XEP-0016.

(3) A second client connects, as f...@acme.com/b.
(4) Via f...@acme.com/a, client creates a privacy list, and attempts to 
set it as the default, as in example 18.


Question: should step (4) result in a ?

It seems like examples 18 and 22 of the XEP could be extrapolated to 
suggest that this case would also result in a , but I wanted 
to get others' thoughts and see if I might just be missing something.


Cheers,
Andrew