Re: [Standards] XEP-0353: Rework whole spec, namespace bump
On 12/8/21 1:42 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: Am 07.12.21 um 23:31 schrieb Lance Stout: +1 on merging. There’s been a lot of foundational improvements since mid-2014 that we can safely rely on now, so these changes make sense. with authors hat: what Lance said! IIRC the only reason we didn't go for a full carbons + mam dependency back in the day because the path forward on those was unclear. Agreed. I left some editorial comments on the PR, but in general LGTM. /psa ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] XEP-0353: Rework whole spec, namespace bump
Am 07.12.21 um 23:31 schrieb Lance Stout: +1 on merging. There’s been a lot of foundational improvements since mid-2014 that we can safely rely on now, so these changes make sense. with authors hat: what Lance said! IIRC the only reason we didn't go for a full carbons + mam dependency back in the day because the path forward on those was unclear. ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
