Re: [Standards] XEP-0175 v. 1.2rc1

[Eloi Bail]

Hi,
Indeed this draft provides more detailed information. It's great :)

I think it would be useful to make a similar draft for PLAIN method, the
core xmpp RFC only explaining the digest-md5 method.


Thanks for this work,

regards,

Eloi

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 As discussed recently on the list, I've updated XEP-0175 (Best Practices
 for Use of SASL ANONYMOUS) to provide more detailed recommendations
 regarding usage restrictions for anonymous users.

 http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0175-1.2.html


 http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0175.xml?%40diffMode=u%40diffWrap=sr1=1675r2=3308u=3ignore=k=

 Peter

 - --
 Peter Saint-Andre
 https://stpeter.im/


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iEYEARECAAYFAkpSMwMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwIlACeIIucufW62wDiqgVBUUeGowbK
 XVsAoMm8PZAZb3d0VjCuV32yIAvE0uFi
 =cvXd
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

[Standards] Anonymous SASL and Presence

[Eloi Bail]

Hi,


I would like to know if XMPP standard allows to push presence in case of
anonymous SASL ?

If it is, do you know if ejabberd handles it ?


BR,


Eloi

Re: [Standards] Anonymous SASL and Presence

[Eloi Bail]

Thanks for your reply...
As I understood, if I want to push my presence, I have to send a stanza for
each JID because XMPP servers can not route my presence (because roster
empty)... which is not very great :(

So I guess, I have to use encryption SASL, to have a not random JID and so
push only one time my presence.

Right ?


Eloi



2009/6/30 Jiří Zárevúcky zarevucky.j...@gmail.com

 2009/6/30 Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net:
  On Tue Jun 30 16:20:25 2009, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
 
  2009/6/30 Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net:
   On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
  
   It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
   empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have to
 send
   it to a known address, or add people to your temporary roster first.
  
   FWIW, although I agree that's what *should* happen, nothing in the
   specifications available says that's what does.
  
 
  Actually, XMPP-IM does. At least for broadcasts as long as roster is
  enabled. Of course the roster may be disabled. Routing of directed
  presences is not strictly required, too.
 
  No, I meant the unique (~random) JID, and the empty or temporary
  roster. None of those things are specified.
 

 There is nothing that would classify random JID as something
 special. The same applies to empty and temporary roster. And you
 can't say rules of XMPP-IM don't apply to them.

  What happens if you have a roster is, of course, specified.