-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/09 1:23 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I propose adding the following informational (and self-explanatory)
>> paragraph to the section on TCP Binding in 3920bis...
>
>> 4.6. Reliability
>
>>The use of long-lived TCP connections in XMPP implies that the
>>sending of XML stanzas over XML streams can be unreliable, since the
>>parties to a long-lived TCP connection might not discover a
>>connectivity disruption in a timely manner. At the XMPP application
>>layer, long connectivity disruptions can result in undelivered
>>stanzas. Although the core XMPP technology defined in this
>>specification does not contain features to overcome this lack of
>>reliability, an XMPP extension for doing so is defined in [XEP-0198].
>
>
>
> This sounds like a good idea to me.
> I was wondering whether it might be a good idea to mention XEP-0184 too
> though.
> Possibly in a different context, maybe even in 3921bis.
> It seems much more useful for the normal Instant Messaging case as long
> as XEP-0198 is not widely deployed IMHO. OTOH not mentioning 184 might
> be a way to increase 198 deployment...
I think that XEP-0198 applies more at the core streaming level (3920bis)
and XEP-0184 applies more at the IM level (3921bis).
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkqpVosACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxlEACeNbFbPgVEZQ8oxFweX3DmBgGL
WIcAnjtcQii8b7DTIykDYOAJhVk26Og+
=otA0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
