On 2012-08-14 03:09, Mark Rejhon wrote:
Barry may have presented a compromise I can accept. The first
(introductory) stanza is still full word, and the second and third is
not too difficult for most readers to figure out.
On 2012-08-13 8:44 PM, "Barry Dingle" <btdin...@gmail.com
<mailto:btdin...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Mark,
Regarding the example in 4.1, I agree with Gunnar. The first
example gives the wrong initial impression by sending only
complete words in the <rtt/>. (It made me go and double check how
the protocol worked.)
I suggest that we keep the first <rtt/> as is, but slightly change
the second and third <rtt/> text contents to:
*<t>my J**</t>*
and
*<t>uliet!</t>*
respectively.
This retains the readability but also shows that the <rtt/> is
sent independently of word boundaries.
Cheers,
/Barry
This was item #5 Let us try to keep track of the issue numbers and
their state.
I accept the solution.
/Gunnar
