Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Rayo Clustering

2014-05-02 Thread Kevin Smith
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:10 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
 The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
 Title: Rayo Clustering

Question for the authors, because it's not clear to me.

We have tended to shy away from standardising clustering protocols, as
these are perceived as being an implementation detail, rather than
needed for interop between different implementations; is the purpose
of this proposal that independent implementations will be run in a
heterogeneous cluster, and if so how likely is this to happen?

/K


Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Rayo Clustering

2014-05-02 Thread Ben Langfeld
The idea is that implementations of gateways and nodes may be completed
independently. There certainly is a requirement for Supplier A's gateway to
be used with Supplier B's nodes, however. This requires the protocol
between nodes and gateways to be specified.

It is intended that nodes might additionally be used in heterogeneous
clusters, but I admit there is not an urgent requirement for this.


On 2 May 2014 10:29, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:10 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
 wrote:
  The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
  Title: Rayo Clustering

 Question for the authors, because it's not clear to me.

 We have tended to shy away from standardising clustering protocols, as
 these are perceived as being an implementation detail, rather than
 needed for interop between different implementations; is the purpose
 of this proposal that independent implementations will be run in a
 heterogeneous cluster, and if so how likely is this to happen?

 /K