Re: [Standards] XEP-0071 v. 1.4pre1
None forbids their implementation, but do you think every client should implement them? Pavel On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:18:19 -0600 Joe Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implementation experience has shown that table and friends is strongly demanded by users, mostly because of copy/paste from Excel. I think we should consider their inclusion in the future, if we're going to open XEP-71 back up. On Aug 6, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: In accordance with recent list discussion, I have provisionally modified XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM). Rendered text: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0071-1.4.html Changelog: Encouraged support for several more structural elements from the text module (blockquote, cite, em, and strong); further clarified security considerations regarding fetching and presentation of images; modified several examples; clarified several points throughout the text. SVN diff: http://is.gd/1h2G /psa -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
Re: [Standards] XEP-0071 v. 1.4pre1
Pavel Simerda wrote: On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:18:19 -0600 Joe Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implementation experience has shown that table and friends is strongly demanded by users, mostly because of copy/paste from Excel. I think we should consider their inclusion in the future, if we're going to open XEP-71 back up. None forbids their implementation, but do you think every client should implement them? In fact tables are currently forbidden, because the Table Module from XHTML Modularization is not part of the definition for XHTML-IM. Elements like em and strong are currently allowed (they're part of the Text Module) but not encouraged. IMHO adding a new module is a much bigger change than no longer discouraging particular elements or attributes from a module that's currently supported. I think we'd need a strong consensus to add a new module. Question: how do we expect an existing XHTML-IM implementation to behave if it receives content that include a table? Does it follow the ignore rule from XHTML? If so, I think the presentation would be sub-optimal. Or does it return an error? (In fact, error handling is not very well defined for XHTML-IM right now, hmm) /psa smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Standards] XEP-0071 v. 1.4pre1
Implementation experience has shown that table and friends is strongly demanded by users, mostly because of copy/paste from Excel. I think we should consider their inclusion in the future, if we're going to open XEP-71 back up. On Aug 6, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: In accordance with recent list discussion, I have provisionally modified XEP-0071 (XHTML-IM). Rendered text: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0071-1.4.html Changelog: Encouraged support for several more structural elements from the text module (blockquote, cite, em, and strong); further clarified security considerations regarding fetching and presentation of images; modified several examples; clarified several points throughout the text. SVN diff: http://is.gd/1h2G /psa
